Claiming legal privilege over a grievance investigation report
About this episode
Chris Fisher discusses a case regarding the inability to claim legal privilege over an investigation report.
In this episode of the Mayer Brown employment podcast, head of the London Employment Group, Chris Fisher, looks at a case where a client was unable to claim legal privilege over the original version of an investigation report, despite having sent it to their external lawyers for advice before it was issued to the employee: the case of University of Dundee v. Chakraborty .
People in this episode
Host: Chris Fisher
Topics covered
- legal privilege
- grievance investigation
- employment law
- client advice
- case analysis
Keywords
- legal privilege
- grievance investigation report
- employment law
- University of Dundee
- Chakraborty
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: University of Dundee
More episodes of Employment & Benefits Unpacked
- Beyond Borders: Labor Law Strategies for Cross-Border Deals
- Pensions Playbook: Investing in the UK
- ERISA Litigation Targets Voluntary Benefits: What Employers Should Know
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act Part 3 Executive Pay IRC 162 Changes Alternative Minimum Tax Considerations and the New Section 4960 Landscape
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Part 2: Leveraging "Trump Accounts" for Financial Wellness, Benefit Plan Design, and Health Savings Plan Specifics
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Part 1: Deductions for Tipped Wages, Overtime Breaks, and the New Fringe Benefits Playbook
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Employment & Benefits Unpacked podcast page.