How Modern Science Got Consciousness Wrong From the Start | Philip Goff
About this episode
Philip Goff discusses the nature of consciousness and its implications for AI and evolution.
What if consciousness isn't a byproduct of complex brains, but a fundamental feature of reality itself, present, in some rudimentary form, all the way down to electrons and quarks? Philip Goff, a philosopher at Durham University and one of panpsychism's leading contemporary advocates, joins Craig Smith to make that case, arguing that modern science's founding move - separating the mathematical world physics studies from the subjective experience we know only from the inside - solved one problem while quietly creating another we've never resolved. The conversation inevitably turns to AI: could a large language model ever be conscious? Goff's answer is a careful, well-reasoned no, not because he thinks consciousness is magical, but because his framework treats it as something closer to the physical substance of reality than an abstract computation, making him skeptical that anything resembling current AI architecture could cross that threshold. Along the way, he tackles one of the genuine open mysteries in his field: if natural selection only cares about behavior, why did evolution bother making us conscious at all, and what would it even mean to find experimental evidence for an…
More episodes of Eye On A.I.
- "According to NASA's Definition of Life, I'm Not Alive" - Why Nobody Can Define Life | Dr. Kate Adamala
- 6 in 10 Enterprises Can't Find the Root Cause When Their AI Workloads Fail | Paul Appleby, Virtana
- Inside the Enterprise Browser Rebuilding Security for the AI Era | Bradon Rogers, Island
- What Industrial AI Actually Looks Like | Kriti Sharma, Nexus Black
- The Biggest AI Security Problem Isn't the Model. It's This. | Devvret Rishi
- Big Pharma Fails 50% of the Time in Phase Three. AI Can Fix That | Vin Singh, BullFrog AI
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Eye On A.I. podcast page.