Eye On A.I.

Every major data breach in the last 30 years shares the same root cause: the data inside the wall was never protected, only the wall. And AI frontier models are now making that wall easier to breach than ever, scanning codebases externally to discover undisclosed vulnerabilities and write exploits before anyone knows the hole exists. Trent Telford, Chairman, CEO & Founder of Qanapi, joins Craig Smith to explain why the entire architecture of conventional cybersecurity is structurally broken, and what a genuinely different approach, built from the opposite assumption, looks like. Rather than trying to build a better wall, Qanapi starts from the baseline that the data will eventually be exposed, and encrypts it at the individual word, paragraph, or database cell level, tying each unique key to a verified identity and a set of conditional policies that must all be met simultaneously before anything can be decrypted. The most commercially urgent application of this architecture is one that unlocks AI adoption for enterprises that have been sitting on the sidelines: Qanapi's gateway service encrypts sensitive fields before data reaches Claude, ChatGPT, or any other frontier model, and the model simply reports it cannot read the encrypted sections, while still reasoning over everything else. Trent discusses how Qanapi's Fathom tool confirmed in testing that Claude could not read the encrypted sections. He describes two major retailers - one using AI heavily, one abstaining entirely because of data security concerns - and asks the question every enterprise leader should be sitting with: how long can you last off the train before you get blitzed? The episode also covers drone security in denied wireless environments, the post-quantum encryption mandate that federal agencies have no practical plan to execute, and why Qanapi's business has exploded in the last six months as the AI gold rush has finally turned its attention from models to infrastructure. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

In 2023, General Cherry started making 10 drones a month. Today they're approaching 100,000. Marko Kushnir, communications director of one of Ukraine's top-five drone manufacturers, joins Craig Smith for one of the most operationally specific conversations available about what drone warfare looks like at industrial scale, from the daily feedback loops with front-line units that drive product iteration, to the $2,000 interceptor drone that can destroy a $100,000 Shahed, to the on-device AI targeting model that guides an interceptor to impact at 70% accuracy after the operator activates it and steps back. The conversation's most important insights are structural rather than technical. Marko describes the fundamental asymmetry of the conflict with unusual precision: Ukraine's decentralized, startup-driven ecosystem produces new technologies faster than Russia's command economy, but Russia's vertical industrial structure copies and scales those technologies faster than Ukraine can stay ahead. He also expresses genuine alarm about fully autonomous AI drones, not from an ethical standpoint but from a practical one: any autonomous capability Ukraine deploys will be in Russian hands within weeks, making full autonomy a danger Ukraine would share immediately with its enemy. The episode closes with his most far-reaching argument: just as the internet era created a cybersecurity industry that every organization eventually had to build, the drone era is now beginning, and every government, police force, and major corporation will soon need a drone security department to function safely in a world where drones are as common as smartphones. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

The most consequential arms race in the world right now isn't nuclear, it's software. Craig Smith speaks with Alexander Palamarchuk, an engineer in the R&D department of Ukraine's Azov Brigade, calling in from approximately 18 kilometers from the front line in the Pokrovsk region. What emerges is one of the most technically candid accounts available of what drone warfare actually looks like from the inside: how Ukraine went from homemade reconnaissance drones in 2014 to AI-guided systems being developed and tested in real combat today, how the jamming arms race has forced his unit to develop custom frequency systems spanning 100 to 3,000 megahertz in a constant search for clean windows Russia hasn't yet closed, and why the tank - once the defining weapon of land warfare - has been reduced on the modern battlefield to a mobile jamming platform. The most important distinction Alexander draws is one that rarely surfaces in mainstream coverage: AI already exists that can recognize and classify vehicles and people with high accuracy. The unsolved problem isn't recognition, it's discrimination, determining with certainty whether a recognized target is military or civilian. That gap is the only thing standing between today's AI-assisted drones and fully autonomous lethal systems, and Alexander puts the timeline for closing it at approximately two years. The US maintains an official policy of not developing fully autonomous lethal weapons for ethical reasons. On the battlefield 18 kilometers from where Alexander is speaking, that policy is being outpaced in real time, and he is clear that NATO's software advantage positions Western countries to win that race before anyone else gets there. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

Most humanoid robot companies are still running curated demos in replica environments. Foundation Future Industries is running 150 robots on real automotive production lines in Georgia, and heading to Ukraine this year to deploy on the battlefield. Mike LeBlanc, the co-founder of Foundation Future Industries - currently the only company supplying humanoid robots to the US Department of Defense, with contracts across the Army, Navy, and Air Force, joins Craig Smith to explain why the race is moving faster than almost anyone in the industry believes, and why the companies that are moving cautiously are about to be left behind. His frame is striking: he keeps a framed 1906 New York Times article on his office wall predicting that human flight would take between one million and ten million years. It was published three months before the Wright Brothers flew. He thinks humanoids are in exactly that moment right now. The conversation covers the full operational picture: how Foundation trains robots using video rather than simulation; why the fry-cook robot that couldn't open the bag of fries is a perfect metaphor for everything wrong with how most companies approach go-to-market in this space; why the human form factor isn't a philosophical preference but an empirical fact, humans are still doing every job in every factory that other robots can't, and that's the proof of concept; and why Mike LeBlanc isn't particularly worried about competing against Boston Dynamics backed by Google DeepMind, because they're still demoing in replica sites while Foundation is deploying on production lines. The episode ends with a bet: LeBlanc tells Craig that in twelve months, he'll be back to report 10,000 robots deployed in the world. Craig says he remains cautious. One of them is going to be right. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

The same tools that slowed the U.S. military down in Afghanistan (PowerPoint, Excel, email, and Word) are now slowing American businesses down in the AI race. Drew Cukor spent 30 years as a Marine intelligence officer, helped build Project Maven into a battlefield command and control system, served as Chief Data Officer at JP Morgan, and is now leading AI transformation at TWG AI. In this episode, he joins Craig Smith to make a case that most enterprise AI strategies are fundamentally broken, not because the technology isn't there, but because companies are storing their data in Microsoft file folders where it becomes inaccessible to AI, appointing AI officers who block progress rather than enable it, and mistaking chatbot deployments for transformation. Cukor's prescription is specific: take a company's core workflows apart, how it acquires customers, delivers services, handles back office operations, and rebuild them from scratch with AI embedded throughout, protected inside Palantir Foundry, delivered within 36 months, with the CEO owning the outcome rather than delegating it to a CTO or a made-up AI officer role. The stakes, he argues, are not abstract: China is going AI-native from the start without the legacy infrastructure that's slowing American enterprise, token spend is approaching the cost of a human salary making poorly designed AI workflows as expensive as bad hiring decisions, and the window for acting is closing. The most important video he recommends any business leader watch isn't one where the AI wins, it's the footage of Lee Sedol losing to AlphaGo and realizing mid-game that he no longer understands how the game works. That moment, Cukor says, is coming for every legacy business that doesn't move now. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

Most enterprise IT teams spend the majority of their time fighting the same fires repeatedly. BMC Helix is building the AI system that handles those fires automatically, detecting anomalies, tracing root cause through millions of asset relationships, generating remediation plans, and learning from every incident it resolves. Craig Smith sits down with Erhan Giral, VP of AI Strategy and Innovation at BMC Helix, and Ryan Manning, Chief Product Officer at BMC Helix, to explain how agentic AI is transforming IT service management from a reactive, human-driven process into something closer to a self-healing system, and why doing that at enterprise scale requires a fundamentally different architecture than most AI deployments attempt. The most technically interesting part of this conversation is where BMC Helix is headed: building "gyms", synthetic data center environments where AI agents deliberately break things and learn to fix them overnight, 24 hours a day, generating the bespoke operational training data that text-based foundation models can no longer provide. Erhan describes an architecture of specialized sub-agents, anomaly detection, log analysis, root cause analysis, remediation planning, that work in a hierarchy, passing hypotheses between each other until they converge on an answer, fine-tuned to reason the way a specific enterprise's best IT engineer would rather than the way a generic documentation page reads. For customers, the results are measurable: 25 to 50% cost reduction, fewer recurring outages, and IT staff who can finally go home at a predictable time rather than spending their nights firefighting problems that could have been prevented. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.

Every company is creating content that nobody reads, nobody watches, and nobody remembers, and the CEO of the AI platform that 90% of Fortune 100 companies use to fix that just explained what comes next. In this episode, Craig Smith sits down with Victor Riparbelli, co-founder and CEO of Synthesia, to discuss the $4 billion company that is now redefining what video communication means for the enterprise. The conversation opens with the founding insight that still drives the company: AI is going to drive the marginal cost of creating video to zero, which changes not just how content is produced but who can produce it and for whom. Victor describes how Synthesia found its first real market not in Hollywood - which rejected the technology as too low quality - but in corporate trainers and educators who were comparing it not to a film but to a 10-page PDF no one was reading. The most forward-looking section of the conversation covers Synthesia's next product: moving video from a one-way broadcast into a two-way interactive conversation, where an AI avatar can conduct a real-time sales demo, simulate a customer for sales training, draw graphs on screen to explain pricing, and score whether the person on the other side actually understood the content. Victor also makes a sharp prediction about where AI entertainment will actually emerge, not in cinemas or on Netflix, but from film students with laptops posting 17-minute short films on Instagram, the same way synthesizers didn't replace pianos but created entirely new genres of music. Key Topics Covered: ● How Synthesia found its first real market: corporate trainers creating content nobody was reading, who compared AI video not to Hollywood but to a PDF, and found it vastly superior ● The transition from one-way video broadcast to two-way interactive avatar conversations, and what that means for sales demos, corporate training, and education ● Why Hollywood will be the last industry to adopt AI video, and why the first AI-generated entertainment will come from broke film students on Instagram, not studios ● Why AI content won't replace real video, it will become its own genre, the same way synthesizers didn't replace guitars but created electronic music ● How the CEO uses Claude daily for strategic thinking, playing devil's advocate, and replacing the long memo with a voice note As AI video tools proliferate, this conversation offers one of the clearest frameworks for understanding where the technology is actually headed, not toward Hollywood, but toward transforming the way every company communicates internally and externally, with interactive AI avatars replacing the static website as the primary interface between a business and its customers. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI. Craig Smith on X: https://x.com/craigss EYE On A.I. on X: https://x.com/EyeOn_AI Connect with Victor Riparbelli LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/victorriparbelli

One company now has more AI agents deployed in its organization than it has human employees. Slack's CMO Ryan Gavin dropped that stat into a conversation with Craig Smith, and then immediately identified the secondary problem it creates: when your digital workforce outnumbers your human one, how do employees know which agent to call for which task? That orchestration problem, and the conversational interface that solves it, is what this episode is really about. Gavin describes Slack bot's transformation from a notification tool into what he calls the ChatGPT moment for the enterprise, an AI that doesn't just understand the internet, but understands your business, your team, your customers, and your company's entire conversational history, all the way back to day one. The conversation covers the full arc of what this shift means in practice: a Salesforce executive walking into an unfamiliar meeting and being praised for their questions, because Slack bot had prepared them in minutes using the team's full history; a marketer who built his own data scientist agent over a weekend and is now completely unshackled from the bottleneck that was slowing him down; and Gavin's most honest admission, that he's been saying for years that AI won't replace jobs, but this is the first time he actually believes it, because the soul-crushing "work of work" is finally shrinking, and what's left is the kind of creative, high-energy output that people actually want to do. The inbox, he says, is a deathtrap in the AI era. The companies that figure out how to move beyond it will outperform their competitors by multiples. Subscribe to Eye on A.I. for weekly conversations with the people building and deploying the future of AI.