From the Courthouse Steps: Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.
About this episode
The episode discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. regarding sports eligibility based on biological sex.
In the consolidated cases Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court held that neither Title IX nor the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states or schools from determining sports eligibility based on biological sex. Join us for a Courthouse Steps webinar breaking down the decision, the separate opinions, and what it may mean for Title IX, equal protection doctrine, school athletics, and future litigation over sex-based classifications. Featuring: Rachel N. Morrison, Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President & Senior Legal Fellow, Defending Education
People in this episode
Guests: Rachel N. Morrison, Sarah Parshall Perry
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Supreme Court, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Defending Education
Books & works: Little v. Hecox, West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Places: West Virginia
More episodes of FedSoc Forums
- Accreditation of Higher Education: A Primer
- From the Courthouse Steps: National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission
- The National Popular Vote Compact: An End Run Around the Electoral College?
- From the Courthouse Steps: Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook
- Litigation Finance: Access to Justice, Lawfare, and Foreign Influence
- From the Courthouse Steps: Trump v. Barbara
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the FedSoc Forums podcast page.