
This episode discusses the role of generative AI in education through the lens of inquiry-based learning and its implications for authentic authorship and student engagement.
Welcome to FOSIL Education and School Libraries, a conversation about liberal education, signature inquiry, and how generative AI fits, or doesn’t, into real classroom practice. This episode follows on from last week’s podcast, Clarifying the purpose of education , explains the Year 9 Signature Work inquiry: an interdisciplinary, schoolwide project embedded in English that builds thoughtful reading, writing, and speaking skills and culminates in a spoken presentation and Q&A. It contrasts authentic human texts (like Laudato Si’) with AI-generated summaries, raising concerns about AI’s tendency to flatten voice and strip nuance. We argue that tools must be judged against clear educational aims: supporting student attention, authentic authorship, and the dialogic process of learning. * Eric O. Springsted -- discussing Simone Weil’s notion of attention in Attention, Availability, and the Reading of Books (2025). * Janet Salmons and the flattening of language in Finding Your Voice in a Ventriloquist’s World – AI and Writing (2025). * Claudio Nastruzzi and semantic ablation in Why AI writing is so generic, boring, and dangerous: Semantic ablation (2026). * Jane Rosenzweig (2022)…
Host: Elizabeth Hutchinson
Books & works: Attention, Availability, and the Reading of Books, Finding Your Voice in a Ventriloquist’s World – AI and Writing, Why AI writing is so generic, boring, and dangerous: Semantic ablation, The Fight About AI
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the FOSIL, Education and School Libraries podcast page.