What the Hell is Irregular Warfare Anyway?
About this episode
This episode explores the various definitions of irregular warfare and their implications for military operations and strategy.
Episode 152 of the Irregular Warfare Podcast grapples with the many definitions of irregular warfare used across the community of interest. In this episode, our guests discuss why the concept of irregular warfare has resisted a stable definition across decades of changing doctrine, and what that persistent confusion has cost operationally and strategically. We walk through three competing definitional approaches— the maximal, the traditional, and the competition-disruption model — weighing the strengths and weaknesses of each. We close by asking what irregular warfare actually is at its core, and why getting that answer right matters, not just for writers of doctrine, but for practitioners. The article is here: Fragmented Frontiers: Three Approaches to Understanding Irregular Warfare Dr. Chris Tripodi is Reader in Irregular Warfare at the Defence Studies Department, King's College London. His research focuses on the forms of knowledge Western militaries use to understand their operational environments, and the complex relationship between counterinsurgency theory and practice. Eric Robinson is an Associate Director of the Data Science and Technology Group at the RAND Corporation…
More episodes of Irregular Warfare Podcast
- Where the Lion Can’t Reach: Unconventional Warfare in Major War
- Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare
- From Orbit to Objective: Space and the Future of Conflict
- Iran, Revolution, and the Logic of Proxy Warfare
- The Strategic Logic of Large Militant Alliance Networks
- Preserving the American Edge: Revitalizing the Defense Industrial Base
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Irregular Warfare Podcast podcast page.