How retaliation risk complicates fraud investigations
About this episode
This episode discusses how retaliation risks complicate fraud investigations and offers strategies to mitigate these challenges.
Retaliation — actual or perceived — can make fraud investigations more complex and less effective. In this episode of the Journal of Accountancy podcast, Fred Kohm, CPA/CFF, a partner at Grant Thornton, summarizes insights from the latest FVS Eye on Fraud report and explains how nuanced workplace dynamics can affect whistleblower cases. Kohm shares examples of subtle retaliation and explains how forensic accountants, auditors, and other professionals can recognize retaliation risks and strengthen investigative practices. "Whether you are a forensic accountant, an auditor, or perhaps a CPA in another role …, be aware that retaliation is real," Kohm said. Editor's note: The spring 2026 FVS Eye on Fraud report is available for download at the link above. It becomes exclusive to FVS Section members after July 10. What you'll learn from this episode: Defining "retaliation" in the context of a whistleblower complaint and investigation. Why fear of retaliation can limit the information whistleblowers share. How retaliation can show up in subtle ways, from exclusion to heightened scrutiny. What makes retaliation a complex challenge for forensic accountants gathering evidence. The…
More episodes of Journal of Accountancy Podcast
- Awkward silence is OK — and other networking secrets
- From estate planning to AI: Managing CPA liability
- The AICPA's CEO on trust, AI, and the profession's future
- Midyear advocacy update: STEM, BOI, taxes and licensure
- Why mindset may matter more than technology adoption
- Why mindset may matter more than technology adoption
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Journal of Accountancy Podcast podcast page.