Professional Responsibility & MPRE: Litigation & Advocacy - Meritorious Claims, Candor to the Tribunal, Fairness to Opposing Counsel, Evidence, Witnesses, Prosecutors, Trial Publicity & Lawyer as Witn

Professional Responsibility & MPRE: Litigation & Advocacy - Meritorious Claims, Candor to the Tribunal, Fairness to Opposing Counsel, Evidence, Witnesses, Prosecutors, Trial Publicity & Lawyer as Witn

July 17, 2026 · 1h 12m

About this episode

The episode discusses the ethical boundaries of advocacy in law, focusing on professional responsibility and the importance of candor and fairness in legal proceedings.

» 📘VIEW THE COMPANION STUDY GUIDE📘[💡FREE💡] « ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ EPISODE SUMMARY Advocacy has boundaries. A lawyer may represent a client forcefully, but must not file frivolous claims, mislead courts, falsify evidence, obstruct discovery, coach witnesses to lie, improperly contact represented persons, or prejudice proceedings through public statements. A lawyer must not bring or defend a proceeding or assert an issue without a nonfrivolous basis in law and fact. Good-faith arguments for changing the law are allowed. Criminal defense lawyers may require the prosecution to prove every element. Candor to the tribunal requires truthful statements of fact and law, correction of prior material false statements, disclosure of controlling adverse legal authority not disclosed by the opponent, and refusal to offer evidence known to be false. If material false evidence has been offered, the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures, which may include disclosure to the tribunal if necessary. Ex parte proceedings require heightened candor because the opposing party is absent. The lawyer must disclose material facts needed for an informed decision, even if adverse. Fairness to…

Topics covered

Keywords

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: The Law School of America

More episodes of Law School

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Law School podcast page.