About this episode

The episode explores the morality of networks and their role in society, questioning whether they serve as the glue of society or as a means of privilege.

Michael Buerk chairs a special debate from the Hay Festival examining the morality of networks. The release of the Epstein files has been a reminder that power often flows not just through formal institutions, but through webs of connection: political friendships, old school ties, and professional circles. There's been focused attention on how influential networks operate, and how access, opportunity and protection can follow. Critics say such cases expose a world where success depends less on merit than on who you know. But networks are not confined to the wealthy or the powerful. From journalism and politics to business, academia and religion, informal relationships shape how institutions actually work. People rely on contacts for jobs, introductions and advice. Trust is built through familiarity. Sociologists call this “social capital”, the networks of relationships that allow communities and organisations to function. Anthropologists go further: humans are a networked species, whose survival has long depended on cooperation, loyalty and mutual obligation. The moral tension is that the same instincts that create trust also draw boundaries. Networks build solidarity, but they…

People in this episode

Host: Michael Buerk

Topics covered

• networks
• social capital
• morality
• privilege
• exclusion
• opportunity

Keywords

• networks
• social capital
• morality
• privilege
• exclusion
• opportunity
• influence
• trust

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: BBC Radio 4, Hay Festival

More episodes of Moral Maze

• How should we respond to rising mental distress? · September 3, 2026 · 57 min
• Data Centres: Whose Thirst Comes First? · August 27, 2026 · 57 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Moral Maze podcast page.