Whose Side Is the Law On? How the Courts Became a Climate Battleground
About this episode
The episode discusses the role of courts in climate change litigation and features insights from experts on significant legal cases worldwide.
"Even if you are small in this society, there is something you can do." Those are the words of Trixy Elle, a mother and a fisherwoman from the Philippines, and one of the claimants from the Odette case, named for the super typhoon she lived through. She may never win in court, but she says that isn’t the point. She is one of more than 100 claimants suing the energy giant Shell, demanding justice and accountability for the losses she has experienced as a result of climate change. This week, Christiana Figueres sits down with Joana Setzer and Catherine Higham, two of the authors of the ninth annual Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation report from the Grantham Research Institute at LSE and the Sabin Center at Columbia Law School. And what they find is complex. There have been cases that have captured the world’s attention. Last year’s ICJ advisory opinion on the obligations of states. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ landmark advisory opinion establishing a human right to a healthy climate. Or the 2015 case brought by the Urgenda Foundation, where a Dutch court told the government it had a legal duty to protect its citizens from climate change, and ordered…
More episodes of Outrage + Optimism: The Climate Podcast
- Rosebank, Cambo, and the Conversation Christiana Never Got to Have
- Is It Over? A Direct Answer to Climate Despair
- London Cooking: A Climate Action Week, a Resigning PM, and the Future of Climate Diplomacy
- From SpaceX to City Streets: Who Pays for the AI Data Centre Boom?
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Outrage + Optimism: The Climate Podcast podcast page.