About this episode

The episode discusses the legal case of Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell regarding claims related to the herbicide Roundup and its alleged link to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Monsanto Company v. Durnell Justia · Docket · oyez.org Petitioner: Monsanto Company. Respondent: John L. Durnell. Facts of the case (from oyez.org) John L. Durnell used Monsanto’s product Roundup, a herbicide containing the active ingredient glyphosate. Durnell subsequently developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which he alleged was caused by his exposure to Roundup and glyphosate. In January 2019, Durnell sued Monsanto, asserting claims for strict liability defective design, strict liability failure to warn, and negligence. Durnell claimed that Monsanto should have included a cancer warning on Roundup’s label to alert users to the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from glyphosate exposure. After a jury trial in September 2023 in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the jury found in favor of Durnell on his strict liability failure to warn claim and awarded him $1.25 million in compensatory damages, but ruled for Monsanto on the defective design and negligence claims. Monsanto moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, arguing that federal law—specifically the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)—both expressly and impliedly…

More episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments

• [25-1083] Mullin, Sec. of Homeland Security v. Doe · April 29, 2026 · 1h 46m
• [24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. · April 29, 2026 · 1h 0m
• [24-856] Cisco Systems v. Doe I · April 28, 2026 · 1h 57m
• [25-112] Chatrie v. United States · April 27, 2026 · 2h 0m
• [25-429] Blanche, Acting Atty Gen. v. Lau · April 22, 2026 · 1h 30m
• [25-406] FCC v. AT&T · April 21, 2026 · 1h 25m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast page.