Misleading Nutrition 'Science'

Misleading Nutrition 'Science'

From the carnivore experience by Coach Stephen BSc Hons

May 6, 2026 · 15 min

About this episode

The episode discusses biases and funding issues in nutrition science, particularly in the context of plant vs. meat debates.

The conversation delves into the biases and funding issues in nutrition science, highlighting the selective science and funding bias in the plant vs. meat debate. It also explores the findings and limitations of a plant protein study, as well as the conflicts of interest in plant-based research. Additionally, it discusses the concept of hypothetical swaps and absolute risks in dietary studies. Takeaways Selective Science Funding Bias Chapters 00:00 Hypothetical Swaps and Absolute Risks

People in this episode

Host: Coach Stephen BSc Hons

Topics covered

  • nutrition science
  • funding bias
  • plant vs meat debate
  • plant protein study
  • conflicts of interest
  • dietary studies

Keywords

  • nutrition
  • science
  • funding bias
  • plant protein
  • dietary studies
  • conflicts of interest
  • meat debate

More episodes of the carnivore experience

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the the carnivore experience podcast page.