About this episode

The episode discusses the advantages of investing in vacant buildings over fully leased properties in the current market.

Vacant buildings = more upside You avoid paying a premium for someone else’s lease‑up work. You create value through rehab + leasing (forced appreciation), not just clip coupons. Stronger negotiating position Vacant = motivated seller; you have more leverage on price, terms, and concessions . Priced by $/sq ft , often at or below replacement cost . Cleaner from a legal/lease standpoint No legacy leases, estoppels, co‑tenancy clauses, or messy files to inherit. You set your own lease standards from day one. Market conditions favor existing vacant buildings High rates + high construction costs = very little new supply . Low national vacancy (≈4–5%) = strong demand for quality space that already exists. Math can be dramatically better than stabilized deals Example: All‑in at ~$928k vs. stabilized value at $1.85M → $900k forced appreciation . Vacant strategy can create multiples more equity than buying fully stabilized for cash flow. Vacancy risk must be planned for Keep 6–12 months of operating costs in reserve (or financed/raised). Underwrite 12–18 months to stabilize; don’t assume instant tenants. Brokers and data are crucial Good brokers (commission‑only) protect their time—bring…

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Commercial Real Estate Investor Podcast podcast page.