How the world sees Lindsay Clancy
About this episode
The episode discusses the Lindsay Clancy case and its implications on US law regarding motherhood and mental health.
Lindsay Clancy faces first-degree murder charges over the deaths of her three young children. But if her case had happened elsewhere, the charges might have looked very different. Clancy’s trial in Massachusetts has captured international attention. It has divided public opinion and ignited debate over how the US prosecutes cases involving mothers who kill their children — and the charges brought against them. Other countries, including the UK, Canada and Australia, have specific statutes that allow mothers to be charged with infanticide — a conviction that’s more lenient than murder and often results in mental health treatment rather than prison time. So why is US law different? The Global Story’s Asma Khalid speaks with Dr Karen Brennan, a senior lecturer in law at the University of Essex, to discuss what the Lindsay Clancy case reveals about how American law understands motherhood, mental illness and criminal responsibility. (Photo: Lindsay Clancy, with long straight dark brown hair, looks to her lawyer Kevin Reddington, on the day the jury in her murder trial determined that they cannot reach a verdict, in Plymouth, Massachusetts, US, 1 September, 2026. Credit: Greg…
More episodes of The Global Story
- Why America's allies are sanctioning West Bank settlers
- Can Dubai’s luxe image survive the war with Iran?
- Was Saudi Arabia involved in 9/11?
- Is the AI backlash actually a Chinese psy-op?
- Is the world giving up on the US dollar?
- Nepal: Covering a disaster in your own country
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Global Story podcast page.