Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

June 28, 2026 · 16 min · Season 2025 · Episode 105

About this episode

The episode discusses the Supreme Court case Blanche v. Lau regarding the evidentiary standards for border officers when treating green card holders as applicants for admission.

Blanche, Acting Attorney General v. Muk Choi Lau | Case No. 25-429 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 22, 2026 | Decided: June 23, 2026 Overview: The Court addressed whether border officers must possess clear and convincing evidence that a green card holder committed a crime before stripping that person of already-admitted status and treating the holder as an applicant for admission. Question Presented: Whether the INA requires border officers to possess clear and convincing evidence of a crime before treating a green card holder as seeking admission. Posture: Second Circuit vacated removal order; Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve circuit split. Main Arguments: • Petitioner (Government): (1) The INA imposes no evidentiary burden on border officers making on-the-spot classification decisions; (2) the two-step framework requires crime commission at step one and conviction at step two, both satisfied here; (3) the government met the clear-and-convincing standard at the removal hearing through Lau's guilty plea. • Respondent (Lau): (1) The INA's "shall not" command required the government to determine whether an exception applied before treating a returning green card…

Topics covered

Keywords

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Second Circuit, Supreme Court

Books & works: INA

More episodes of The High Court Report

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The High Court Report podcast page.