The episode discusses the Supreme Court case involving Hikma Pharmaceuticals and Amarin Pharma regarding patent infringement and generic drug marketing.
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. | Case No. 24-889 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: 04/29/2026 | Decided: 06/04/2026 Oral Advocates: Petitioners (Hikma): Charles B. Klein of Winston & Strawn LLP Amicus Curiae (United States): Malcolm L. Stewart of the Department of Justice Respondents (Amarin Pharma): Michael R. Huston of Perkins Coie LLP Overview: Amarin's cardiovascular drug patent faced challenge when generic maker Hikma launched a skinny-label version and marketed it through statements Amarin claimed encouraged doctors to prescribe the generic for the still-patented heart indication. Question Presented: Whether a generic drug maker's marketing statements plausibly constitute "active steps" inducing patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(b). Posture: District Court dismissed; Federal Circuit reversed; Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Main Arguments: Petitioner (Hikma): (1) Statements fully consistent with lawful skinny-label marketing cannot constitute active inducement under §271(b); (2) Federal law mandated the label's contents, making legal compliance an obvious alternative explanation that forecloses liability; (3) The Federal Circuit's…
Guests: Charles B. Klein, Malcolm L. Stewart, Michael R. Huston
Organizations: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Amarin Pharma, Inc., Winston & Strawn LLP, Department of Justice, Perkins Coie LLP
Books & works: Hatch-Waxman
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The High Court Report podcast page.