Oral Argument Re-Listen: Louisiana v. Callais | SCOTUS Writes a New Voting Rights Playbook
About this episode
The episode discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana v. Callais, focusing on voting rights and racial gerrymandering.
Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais | Case Nos. 24-109 & 24-110 | Oral Argument: 10/15/25 | Decided: April 29, 2026 | Docket Link: Here and Here Overview: On 4/29/26, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's second majority-Black congressional district as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, overhauled the 40-year-old Gingles framework for vote-dilution claims, and reinterpreted Section 2 to demand a strong inference of intentional discrimination. Question Presented: Whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act required Louisiana to create a second majority-minority congressional district, justifying race-based redistricting under strict scrutiny. Posture: Three-judge district court struck down SB8; direct appeal to Supreme Court affirmed 6-3. Holding: Because the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 52 U. S. C. §10301 et seq., did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of race in creating SB8, and that map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Result: Affirmed and Remanded. Voting Breakdown: 6-3. Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and…
People in this episode
Guest: Janai Nelson
Topics covered
- Voting Rights
- Gerrymandering
- Supreme Court Decisions
- Race and Redistricting
- Legal Frameworks
- Civil Rights
Keywords
- Louisiana v. Callais
- Voting Rights Act
- racial gerrymander
- Supreme Court
- vote-dilution claims
- redistricting
- intentional discrimination
- SB8
- majority-minority district
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Supreme Court, Voting Rights Act of 1965
Places: Louisiana
More episodes of The High Court Report
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The High Court Report podcast page.