What Murdaugh's Investigator Denied Under Oath
About this episode
The episode discusses the implications of the Brady motion filed in the Alex Murdaugh retrial, detailing the evidence demands and their significance for the defense.
The Brady motion filed August 5, 2026, is the widest evidence demand of the Alex Murdaugh retrial so far, and this breakdown goes category by category. The filing renews the defense's July 2022 discovery request and stacks ten new categories on top: new or modified witness deals, statements that contradict old ones, updated disciplinary and internal affairs files, DNA and forensic developments down to analyst proficiency tests and software, fresh search warrants, and post-trial material touching the verdict's integrity. It reaches SLED's Eddie Smith roadside-shooting file and the narcotics investigation. And it asks Judge Debra McCaslin to make prosecutors certify in writing — within thirty days — that a diligent, current search found nothing else favorable to the defense. Tony Brueski lays out why that certification matters more than it sounds. If the state signs it and favorable evidence surfaces at trial, the defense holds the evidence and the state's own paper saying it didn't exist. The Colucci case shows the stakes: a June 2025 quash order, a decade of undisclosed evidence, and David Owen — Moselle's lead investigator — testifying he was never told what a witness swore she…
More episodes of The Re-Trial Of Alex Murdaugh
- Murdaugh Claims SLED Agent Did WHAT?!
- What Creighton Waters Learned About the Murdaugh Evidence in Open Court
- What SLED Never Told Creighton Waters About the Murdaugh Weapons
- Murdaugh: Why Are Prosecutors Fighting His DNA Request?
- Will Murdaugh's Judge Grant This Extraordinary Demand?
- What Alex Murdaugh's Defense Says It Never Received
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Re-Trial Of Alex Murdaugh podcast page.