Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group
About this episode
This episode examines the case Into Nominee 1 Ltd v Study Group UK Ltd, focusing on the principle of frustration in commercial leases due to unexpected events.
Can a commercial lease come to an end because an unexpected event has destroyed its purpose? In this episode of Unpacking the Case, Richard and Lizzie examine Into Nominee 1 Ltd v Study Group UK Ltd, a recent High Court decision that visits the contractual principle of frustration. The case is the latest in a long line of attempts by tenants to argue that a lease has been frustrated by events outside their control. This time, the dispute arose against the backdrop of post-Grenfell fire safety...
People in this episode
Hosts: Richard, Lizzie
Topics covered
- commercial lease
- frustration of contract
- fire safety
- High Court decision
- tenant rights
- unexpected events
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Into Nominee 1 Ltd, Study Group UK Ltd, High Court
More episodes of Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast
- Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered
- Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A
- The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast podcast page.