
Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast
by Davitt Jones Bould
Is this your podcast?Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Est. Listeners
Insufficient chart data. Estimates will improve as the show charts.
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
N/A🎙 Daily cadence·152 episodes·Last published 3w ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
N/A - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
N/A
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 10 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms
Jun 3, 2026
9m 35s
Signal Strength & Security of Tenure: EE v Clock Tower Investments
May 26, 2026
9m 38s
Have your cake and eat it: Caterpillar Properties v Park Cakes
May 26, 2026
11m 18s
Renters’ Rights Act Special
May 22, 2026
17m 45s
The Fight Over Upwards-Only Rent Reviews
May 18, 2026
14m 00s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/3/26 | ![]() Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms✨ | lease renewalcommercial property+3 | — | Star Pubs Trading LtdGunmakers Arms (Essex) LLP+1 | — | Star PubsGunmakers Arms+3 | — | 9m 35s | |
| 5/26/26 | ![]() Signal Strength & Security of Tenure: EE v Clock Tower Investments✨ | telecommunicationsreal estate law+3 | — | EEClock Tower Investments Limited+1 | — | telecoms operatordemised premises+3 | — | 9m 38s | |
| 5/26/26 | ![]() Have your cake and eat it: Caterpillar Properties v Park Cakes✨ | real estate lawcourt decisions+3 | Lizzie | Caterpillar PropertiesPark Cakes+1 | — | Caterpillar PropertiesPark Cakes+5 | — | 11m 18s | |
| 5/22/26 | ![]() Renters’ Rights Act Special✨ | Renters' RightsProperty Law+3 | — | — | — | Renters' Rights Actfixed-term tenancies+5 | — | 17m 45s | |
| 5/18/26 | ![]() The Fight Over Upwards-Only Rent Reviews✨ | real estatelaw+4 | — | English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act | Parliament | upwards-only rent reviewsEnglish Devolution and Community Empowerment Act+4 | — | 14m 00s | |
| 5/14/26 | ![]() The Barn That Broke the Covenant: Duncan Grossart v Vikki Ames✨ | restrictive covenantland development+3 | — | Upper TribunalLaw of Property Act 1925 | Surrey | restrictive covenantDuncan Grossart+5 | — | 12m 06s | |
| 5/8/26 | ![]() Last Orders for the Beer Garden? Pride well Properties v Spirit Pub Company✨ | real estate lawHigh Court decisions+3 | — | Pridewell Properties (London) LtdSpirit Pub Co (Managed) London Ltd+1 | South WoodfordThe Railway Bell | Pridewell PropertiesSpirit Pub Company+5 | — | 13m 25s | |
| 4/17/26 | ![]() Rent Reviews, Reform and What Comes Next✨ | commercial propertyrent reviews+3 | Richard | Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 | — | commercial propertyrent reviews+4 | — | 26m 00s | |
| 4/17/26 | ![]() Unlocking regeneration: Great Jackson St Estates v Manchester CC✨ | real estate lawregeneration+3 | — | Great Jackson St Estates LtdManchester City Council | — | regenerationlandlord+5 | — | 9m 27s | |
| 4/10/26 | ![]() Covenants, & Commonhold: Your Property Law Questions Answered✨ | property lawrestrictive covenants+4 | — | Davitt Jones Bould | — | property lawrestrictive covenants+5 | — | 23m 55s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 4/1/26 | ![]() Colin’s Options: Park Cakes V Caterpillar Property | In this episode, hosts Richard and Lizzie take a closer look at Park Cakes V Caterpillar Property Limited (M80LS041 20 March 2026), a decision from the Leeds Business and Property Court involving Park Cakes, the manufacturer behind M&S’s iconic Colin the Caterpillar. This is not just a story about cakes. It’s an exploration of how options in leases operate, including what happens when those options are exercised and whether any resulting lease falls within the protection of the Landlord a... | 10m 07s | ||||||
| 4/1/26 | ![]() The Perpetuity Problem: Crest Nicholson Regeneration v Calvert | How long is too long? In this episode, hosts Richard and Lizzie unpack the High Court decision in Crest Nicholson Regeneration Ltd v Calvert [2026] EWHC 531 (Ch) and what it tells us about the enduring, and often misunderstood, rule against perpetuities. The rule against perpetuities is designed to stop property from being tied up indefinitely. Traditionally, any future interest had to “vest” within a fixed period — often described as a life in being plus 21 years. If there was even a possi... | 12m 14s | ||||||
| 3/12/26 | ![]() Gnome Man’s Land: Dobson v Unsted | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie and Richard explore Dobson & Anor v Unsted & Anor [2026] a case from the Upper Tribunal that has been making headlines. At the centre of the dispute is eight feet of lawn and a garden gnome that helped spark a neighbourly conflict. The case turns on the doctrine of adverse possession, which allows someone to claim ownership of land if they have possessed and treated it as their own for a set period of time. Richard analyses how much use is enough, d... | 14m 15s | ||||||
| 2/26/26 | ![]() Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: The End of Leasehold as We Know It? | The Government launched its latest leasehold reform via social media, but behind the headlines, the draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill could cause serious ripples across the property market. In this episode, we explore what happens when ground rent income disappears, why commonhold has struggled for 20 years, and whether calling it something other than “common” might have helped. More importantly, we ask: can commonhold function at scale in complex urban developments? Richard and Lizz... | 15m 26s | ||||||
| 2/19/26 | ![]() Posted… But Was It Served? Lamba v Enfield | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin is joined by Richard Snape to unpack the High Court’s ex tempore decision in Lamba v Enfield Borough Council, a judgment that has already sparked lively debate across LinkedIn. The case raises fundamental questions about how notices are validly served under leases. Richard and Lizzie discuss: •How the court approached the interaction between section 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and section 23 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 when serving n... | 10m 41s | ||||||
| 2/19/26 | ![]() General Boundaries, Specific Problems: Handy Cross v Vanni | Where exactly is the boundary, and what happens when the title plan doesn’t give a clear answer? In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin is joined by Richard Snape to dissect the High Court’s decision in Handy Cross Dev Co Ltd v Vanni Properties Ltd [2026] a development-site boundary dispute based on an imprecise title plan. After an influx of boundary cases in the last year this wasn’t just a technical disagreement but went to the heart of how courts determine general boundaries, and when ... | 9m 10s | ||||||
| 2/19/26 | ![]() When “Not Aware” Isn’t Enough: Answering Your CPSE Enquiries | Following our hugely popular webinar, Responding to CPSE Enquiries – the Pitfalls, which attracted 3,500 registrants, Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training, joins host Lizzie Collin to answer the questions our audience most wanted addressed. Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSEs) are standard pre-contract forms prepared by the British Property Federation and used in UK commercial property transactions, requiring sellers or landlords to disclose key information about title, the propert... | 16m 58s | ||||||
| 2/3/26 | ![]() LTA 1954: The Questions Everyone’s Asking | Following our most popular webinar to date, with 3,900 registrants, Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training, joins host Lizzie Collin to answer the questions our audience most wanted addressed on the Landlord & Tenant Act 1954. This Q&A-style episode dives into some of the trickiest and most topical areas of lease renewals, including grounds F and G, statutory compensation, and how evolving issues such as green lease clauses are beginning to affect renewal strategy. They also dis... | 19m 31s | ||||||
| 2/3/26 | ![]() Sacred or Statutory? Service Charges following Cloisters v Anvari | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin is joined by Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to unpack a Court of Appeal decision about an ecclesiastical setting. Cloisters Business Centre Management Company Limited v Anvari [2026] is about service charge liability in a former convent converted into mixed business and residential use and raises important questions about when statutory protections under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 are triggered. Richard and Lizzie ... | 8m 41s | ||||||
| 1/27/26 | ![]() The Service Charge That Didn’t Stick: Tower Hamlets v Leaseholders | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss a recent Court of Appeal decision concerning London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Various Leaseholders. The case arose from an attempt by London Borough of Tower Hamlets to recover the cost of major structural works through service charges. The Court of Appeal rejected the council’s arguments, holding that the leases did not permit those costs to be passed on, rei... | 15m 09s | ||||||
| 12/12/25 | ![]() Azam v Violet Developments: Delay It and Pay It, the Million Pound Lesson | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss a recent County Court decision handed down in November concerning Azam v Violet Developments LLP & Ors. Richard explains the complex background behind the dispute, involving the delayed completion of a major residential and commercial redevelopment in East London, the financial difficulties faced by the developer, and the subsequent forfeiture proceedings brought... | 11m 43s | ||||||
| 11/21/25 | ![]() Club Classics & Break Clauses: Ministry of Sound v British Foreign Wharf | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to discuss the recent County Court decision in Ministry of Sound v British and Foreign Wharf Ltd, a case centred on lease renewals under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The dispute concerned the site of the Ministry of Sound nightclub, and explores the legal tests governing redevelopment break clauses, the balance between tenant security and landlord development rights, and h... | 9m 35s | ||||||
| 11/4/25 | ![]() Defining Long User: Lessons from Kingdom Hall Trust v Davies. | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to discuss the Upper Tribunal decision in Kingdom Hall Trust v Peter Robert Davies. They unpack the complexities of prescriptive easements, focusing on the requirement for a capable grantor and how charitable land status impacts the ability to claim easements. Richard and Lizzie discuss: • The background and legal fiction behind prescriptive easements and “lost modern grant”. ... | 9m 45s | ||||||
| 10/6/25 | ![]() Who Pays for Safety? Lessons from Almacantar v de Valk | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the Upper Tribunal decision in Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No.1 Ltd & Anor v Penelope de Valk & Ors. They explore leaseholder protections under Part 5 of the Building Safety Act, including what constitutes a “relevant defect,” how cladding remediation is treated, and the implications for qualifying and non-qualifying leaseholders. Richard and Lizzie discus... | 10m 08s | ||||||
| 9/17/25 | ![]() Unintended Security of Tenure: Another AP Wireless II v On Tower | In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin is joined by Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to analyse the recent First-tier Tribunal decision in On Tower v AP Wireless II. This important case raises significant questions for both landlords and tenants in relation to periodic tenancies and tenancies at will, as well as their interaction with the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and the Electronic Communications Code. Richard and Lizzie discuss: How the Tribunal approached t... | 10m 44s | ||||||
Showing 25 of 159
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
