Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP
About this episode
Chloe Dickson discusses a Court of Appeal decision regarding confidentiality of disclosures in patent infringement cases.
Chloe Dickson talks you through a decision concerning EOFlow’s request for an order that certain information on the extent to which it had committed acts of infringement of Insulet’s patent be designated as confidential and withheld from public inspection. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
More episodes of You, me & the UPC
- Case by Case | GC Aesthetics succeed in r.190 application for implant samples and key technical and regulatory files
- Case by Case | Milan Central Division conclude proceedings following EPO revocation
- Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms strict duty of candour in ex parte evidence orders
- Case by Case | Private Transcripts of Oral Hearings Permissible Under r. 115 RoP
- Case by Case | Court of Appeal overturns Paris Local Division’s extension of UPC jurisdiction for foreign infringement allegations
- Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division reinforces strict Huawei v ZTE sequencing in Dolby’s Opus SEP win
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the You, me & the UPC podcast page.