Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 1 chart position in 1 market.
By chart position
- 🇳🇱NL · Business#1251K to 10K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
300 to 3K🎙 Daily cadence·59 episodes·Last published 6d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
1K to 10K🇳🇱100% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
400 to 4K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 24 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Case by Case | Lisbon Local Division provides guidance on revocation of expired patents and online infringement
Jun 19, 2026
4m 01s
Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Confidentiality Order against itself to comply with US export controls
Jun 12, 2026
3m 16s
Case by Case | Hamburg Local Division penalises defendants for website and marketplace offerings despite disclaimers
Jun 12, 2026
3m 57s
Case by case | The Hague Local Division allows targeted access to samples for infringement testing
Jun 5, 2026
2m 13s
Case by Case | Brussels Local Division sets costs ceiling for PI proceedings and clarifies waiver and interpretation of cost rules
Jun 5, 2026
3m 11s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/19/26 |  Case by Case | Lisbon Local Division provides guidance on revocation of expired patents and online infringement | Jonathan Ross explores a Lisbon Local Division (LD) decision today. They found that Ericsson had successfully established infringement of its Wi-Fi related patent EP 2 819 131 against AsusTek. The case concerned laptops and notebooks incorporating Intel Wi‑Fi 6 and Wi‑Fi 6E modules. Ericsson alleged that AsusTek infringed through its various European‑facing websites. AsusTek counterclaimed for revocation and denied infringement, arguing both that the patent was invalid and that it was n... | 4m 01s | ||||||
| 6/12/26 |  Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Confidentiality Order against itself to comply with US export controls✨ | legal proceedingssemiconductor technology+4 | — | Yangtze Memory TechnologiesMicron Technology+1 | Düsseldorf | DüsseldorfYangtze Memory Technologies+6 | — | 3m 16s | |
| 6/12/26 |  Case by Case | Hamburg Local Division penalises defendants for website and marketplace offerings despite disclaimers✨ | legal decisionpenalty payments+3 | — | Hamburg Local DivisionOcclutech GmbH+1 | — | Hamburg Local Divisionpenalty payments+3 | — | 3m 57s | |
| 6/5/26 |  Case by case | The Hague Local Division allows targeted access to samples for infringement testing✨ | infringement testingUPC cases+3 | — | polyethylene yarnbulletproof panels+5 | The Hague | Hague Local Divisioninfringement testing+7 | — | 2m 13s | |
| 6/5/26 |  Case by Case | Brussels Local Division sets costs ceiling for PI proceedings and clarifies waiver and interpretation of cost rules✨ | cost decisionPreliminary Injunction+4 | — | Bristows LLPEP 3 732 827 | — | cost decisionBrussels Local Division+4 | — | 3m 11s | |
| 5/29/26 |  Case by Case | Munich Local Division confirms that FRAND security cannot be relied on to resist security for costs✨ | FRANDsecurity for costs+3 | — | Advanced Standard Communication LLCXiaomi | Munich | FRANDsecurity for costs+5 | — | 3m 57s | |
| 5/29/26 |  Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects request for preliminary injunction amid doubts over infringement and urgency✨ | preliminary injunctionintellectual property+4 | — | Bristows LLPOttobock+1 | Düsseldorf | DüsseldorfOttobock+5 | — | 4m 43s | |
| 5/22/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies urgency and waiver of invalidity defences in provisional measures proceedings✨ | provisional measurescourt decisions+4 | — | fampridineViatris Santé+1 | France | Court of Appealprovisional measures+8 | — | 4m 01s | |
| 5/22/26 |  Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects expert bias challenge and upholds ex parte inspection regime✨ | patent lawexpert bias+5 | — | Düsseldorf Local DivisionTopsoe A/S+1 | — | Düsseldorf Local Divisionexpert bias+5 | — | 3m 31s | |
| 5/15/26 |  Case by Case | The Hague Local Division dismisses Stratasys Preliminary Injunction application following narrow claim construction on purge towers✨ | legal dispute3D printing+4 | — | H2CBristows LLP+2 | FrankfurtThe Hague | StratasysBambuLab+6 | — | 3m 14s | |
| 5/15/26 |  Case by Case | Mannheim Local Division grants Nokia ex parte anti-suit injunction in relation to Chinese interim licence application✨ | anti-suit injunctionFRAND actions+3 | — | NokiaGeely | ChinaMannheim+1 | NokiaGeely+6 | — | 2m 58s | |
| 5/8/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms approach to Security for Costs✨ | Security for CostsCourt of Appeal+4 | Hannah Rigby | Bristows LLP | — | Security for CostsCourt of Appeal+5 | — | 4m 17s | |
| 5/8/26 |  Case by Case | The Milan Central Division clarifies holistic novelty assessment and the limits of auxiliary requests✨ | patent lawnovelty assessment+3 | — | Flexicare (Group) LimitedFisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited+1 | Milan Central Division | Milan Central Divisionpatent revocation+4 | — | 3m 34s | |
| 5/1/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies limits of cross appeals under r.220.1 while granting preliminary injunction in Abbott v Sinocare✨ | legal analysiscross appeals+3 | — | EP 3 988 471Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.+2 | — | AbbottSinocare+5 | — | 3m 29s | |
| 5/1/26 |  Case by Case | Paris Local Division revokes Michelin patent following novelty challenge based on single prior art document✨ | patent lawEuropean Patent Court+5 | — | European patent EP 2 323 858 B1Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin+1 | Paris | patent revocationMichelin patent+4 | — | 4m 04s | |
| 4/24/26 |  Case by Case | GC Aesthetics succeed in r.190 application for implant samples and key technical and regulatory files✨ | regulatory compliancemedical devices+3 | — | GC AestheticsEstablishment Labs S.A | — | GC AestheticsEstablishment Labs+4 | — | 4m 53s | |
| 4/24/26 |  Case by Case | Milan Central Division conclude proceedings following EPO revocation✨ | EPO revocationlegal proceedings+3 | — | Neurocrine BiosciencesSpruce Biosciences | Milan | Milan Central DivisionEPO+3 | — | 1m 02s | |
| 4/17/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms strict duty of candour in ex parte evidence orders✨ | Court of Appealduty of candour+4 | — | robot vacuum cleanersEcovacs+2 | trade fair | Court of Appealduty of candour+5 | — | 2m 17s | |
| 4/17/26 |  Case by Case | Private Transcripts of Oral Hearings Permissible Under r. 115 RoP✨ | private transcriptsoral hearings+4 | — | AmazonInterDigital+2 | — | private transcriptoral hearing+5 | — | 3m 49s | |
| 4/10/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal overturns Paris Local Division’s extension of UPC jurisdiction for foreign infringement allegations✨ | UPC jurisdictionCourt of Appeal+3 | Lucy Sewter | Court of AppealParis Local Division+1 | USIreland | UPCCourt of Appeal+6 | — | 3m 06s | |
| 4/10/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP✨ | confidentialitycourt decisions+3 | — | EOFlowInsulet | — | confidential disclosuresCourt of Appeal+5 | — | 1m 51s | |
| 4/2/26 |  Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division reinforces strict Huawei v ZTE sequencing in Dolby’s Opus SEP win✨ | Huawei v ZTEDüsseldorf Local Division+4 | — | OpusDüsseldorf Local Division+4 | — | HuaweiZTE+6 | — | 3m 08s | |
| 4/2/26 |  Case by Case | Munich Local Division rejects limits to patent attorneys and experts in confidentiality club✨ | patent lawconfidentiality+5 | Eden Winlow | Bristows LLP | GermanyMunich | patent attorneysconfidentiality club+5 | — | 2m 42s | |
| 3/27/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal refers questions to the CJEU to clarify the scope of long-arm jurisdiction✨ | long-arm jurisdictionCJEU referral+3 | — | Court of AppealCJEU+1 | — | long-arm jurisdictionCJEU+3 | — | 5m 23s | |
| 3/26/26 |  Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms requests for public access documents under r. 262.1(b) RoP✨ | public accesslegal decisions+3 | — | Bristows LLPr. 62.1(b) RoP | — | public accessCourt of Appeal+3 | — | 3m 19s | |
Showing 25 of 76
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.