Hannah Ritchie Has Some Uncomfortable Truths About Helping the Planet
About this episode
Hannah Ritchie discusses misconceptions in sustainability and the environmental impact of various practices.
What if the things you believe are best for the environment are actually making it worse? In this episode of Business For Good, Paul Shapiro sits down with Hannah Ritchie, data scientist at Our World in Data and author of Not the End of the World and Clearing the Air, to challenge some of the most widely held assumptions in sustainability. Hannah explains why locally produced food rarely has a meaningfully lower carbon footprint than imported alternatives, why organic farming often demands more land to produce the same amount of food, and why nuclear energy is one of the safest and most land-efficient power sources available. She walks through the data behind each of these claims and explains how well-intentioned environmental orthodoxies can actually slow progress toward the outcomes they aim to achieve. Things You Will Learn: Why buying local food does not significantly reduce your carbon footprint compared to choosing lower-impact foods from anywhere in the world. How the carbon footprint of keeping a dog compares to the average American's total annual emissions. Why nuclear energy has caused far fewer deaths per unit of electricity than fossil fuels over its entire history…
More episodes of Business for Good Podcast
- The Lean Startup's Eric Ries on How Good Companies Go Bad
- How a Biologist Built a Startup to Stop Billions of Bird Deaths with Dominique Waddoup
- Turning Waste Biomass Into Carbon-Negative Buildings with Allison Dring
- Rebuilding the Ocean Floor with Clay Castles with Dr. Ulrike Pfreundt
- Why Jim Mellon Is Still All In on Alternative Protein After Five Years
- Investing in Biodiversity with Venture Capitalist Tom Quigley
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Business for Good Podcast podcast page.