Explaining Statistical Significance to a Jury | Episode 88
About this episode
This episode discusses how to explain statistical significance to jurors in a way that resonates with their instincts and understanding.
What happens when jurors’ gut instincts clash with your expert’s data? In this episode, IMS Senior Jury Consulting Advisor Chris Dominic teams up with Affiliate Advisor Steve Pomerantz, PhD, and Trial Consultant Michelle Cooper, JD, to tackle one of the courtroom’s trickiest challenges: making statistical significance make sense to the jury. From framing fairness and randomness in everyday language to using simple checklists that keep jurors focused, this conversation is packed with pr...
Topics covered
- statistical significance
- jury consulting
- courtroom challenges
Keywords
- expert data
- jurors
- fairness
- randomness
- checklists
More episodes of IMS Insights Podcast
- The Core Values That Drive Juror Decisions | Episode 91
- The Credibility Trap: What Undermines Juror Trust | Episode 90
- Defending Goliath in Commercial Disputes | Episode 89
- Mental Mining: Uncovering Your Case Story | Episode 87
- More Than Pretty Pictures: The Power of Trial Graphics | Episode 86
- Decoding Large Language Models and Generative AI for the Jury | Episode 85
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the IMS Insights Podcast podcast page.