AI Governance Illusion: Hidden Risks & Accountability in ITSM
About this episode
This episode explores the Governance–Understanding Gap in AI governance and its implications for ITSM and Enterprise Service Management.
AI governance maturity can be misleading. Many organizations rely on frameworks, policies, and dashboards that signal control but fail to reflect true understanding of AI systems. This episode explores the Governance–Understanding Gap, highlighting why unclear decision ownership and limited system insight create hidden risks in AI, ITSM, and Enterprise Service Management environments. In this episode, we answer to: What is the worst decision an AI system could realistically make in practice? Which AI system in the organization is least understood and hardest to explain? If an AI system makes a harmful decision, who is accountable for it? Resources Mentioned in this Episode: NIST website, framework "AI Risk Management Framework", link https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework European Commission website, policy "Artificial Intelligence", link https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/artificial-intelligence ISO Standards website, ISO/IEC 42001 standard, link https://www.iso.org/standard/81230.html MIT Sloan Management Review website, article "A framework for assessing AI risk", link…
More episodes of The ITSM Practice: Elevating ITSM and IT Security Knowledge
- ITIL 5 Exposed: Accountability Without Authority
- PSD3 Explained: Payments Security & Fraud
- DevSecOps: Responsibility Without Authority
- ISO 31000 vs MoR: Closing the Risk Management Gap
- ITIL 5: Stop Explaining Failures. Start Owning System Decisions
- ITIL 5, SCF and the Compliance Illusion
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The ITSM Practice: Elevating ITSM and IT Security Knowledge podcast page.