About this episode

Matt Kaplan discusses the challenges of science journalism and the impact of academic silos on scientific progress.

Matt Kaplan is the science correspondent at The Economist and also the author of a number of books. His latest work is I Told You So!: Scientists Who Were Ridiculed, Exiled, and Imprisoned for Being Right. Greg and Matt discuss how Matt chose science journalism over academia, the value of being a generalist, and how journalists can cross-pollinate ideas from others. They also discuss academic silos, pecking orders, and how fear, funding pressures, and ego create sticky consensuses that punish deviants, and linking historic cases to modern parallels. Matt argues that incremental NIH/NSF funding discourages bold leaps compared with HHMI-style risk-taking, calls for better incentives for peer review and career transitions for senior scientists, and recounts a case in which a dissenting scientist was attacked to the point that they left the field. *unSILOed Podcast is produced by University FM.*

People in this episode

Host: Greg LaBlanc

Guest: Matt Kaplan

Topics covered

• science journalism
• academic silos
• generalism
• peer review
• funding pressures
• scientific dissent

Keywords

• science journalism
• academic silos
• peer review
• funding
• scientific dissent
• generalist
• risk-taking

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: The Economist, NIH, NSF, HHMI, University FM

Books & works: I Told You So!: Scientists Who Were Ridiculed, Exiled, and Imprisoned for Being Right

More episodes of unSILOed with Greg LaBlanc

• 658. Preventing Alzheimer's: Bridging Research and Practice with Dr. Dale Bredesen · June 8, 2026 · 1h 1m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the unSILOed with Greg LaBlanc podcast page.