About this episode
The episode discusses the Supreme Court case Blanche v. Lau regarding the removal of lawful permanent residents based on criminal offenses.
A case in which the Court will decide whether, to remove a lawful permanent resident who committed an offense listed in Section 1182(a)(2) and was subsequently paroled into the United States, the government must prove that it possessed clear and convincing evidence of the offense at the time of the lawful permanent resident’s last reentry into the United States.
People in this episode
Host: Oyez
Topics covered
- law
- immigration
- permanent residency
- legal evidence
- Supreme Court decisions
Keywords
- lawful permanent resident
- removal
- clear and convincing evidence
- reentry
- criminal offense
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: U.S. Supreme Court
Places: United States
More episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
- Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. · April 29, 2026 · 1h 0m
- Mullin v. Doe · April 29, 2026 · 1h 46m
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I · April 28, 2026 · 1h 57m
- Monsanto Company v. Durnell · April 27, 2026 · 1h 14m
- Chatrie v. United States · April 27, 2026 · 2h 0m
- Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. · April 21, 2026 · 1h 25m
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast page.