About this episode

The episode discusses a Supreme Court case regarding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and its implications for state court decisions.

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents parties who lose in state courts from challenging injuries caused by state-court judgments, can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court.

Topics covered

• Rooker-Feldman doctrine
• state court decisions
• judicial review
• legal challenges
• court judgments

Keywords

• Rooker-Feldman
• state court
• Supreme Court
• legal doctrine
• court judgments
• judicial review

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, U.S. Supreme Court

More episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

• Blanche v. Lau · April 22, 2026 · 1h 30m
• Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. · April 21, 2026 · 1h 25m
• Sripetch v. SEC · April 20, 2026 · 1h 11m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast page.