
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
by Slate Podcasts
Is this your podcast?On the show
From 34 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Trump’s DOJ Finds Yet Another Basement
Oct 17, 2026
40m 20s
Grab Them by the Constitution
Oct 10, 2026
53m 07s
Cruel and Unusual, Bought and Paid For
Oct 3, 2026
1h 13m 56s
Everybody Out of the Pool
Sep 26, 2026
46m 29s
One Ballot After Another
Sep 19, 2026
1h 06m 24s
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Blended from 1 signal.
Built from
By chart position
- 🇺🇸United States · NewsHOME#8712K to 77K
- 🇹🇭TH · News#16324 to 147
- 🇮🇸Iceland · News#1972 to 16
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
12K to 77K🎙 Daily cadence·483 episodes·Last published 2d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
41K to 257K🇺🇸100% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
16K to 103K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/26 | Trump’s DOJ Finds Yet Another Basement | On Monday, the Justice Department raided a sitting congresswoman's D.C. home to build a denaturalization case. Andrew Weissmann joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain the new depths being plumbed by Trump’s DOJ. ICE executed an early morning search of Rep. Ilhan Omar's D.C. home—apparently targeting immigration statements made when she was 12 years old, by a father who is now deceased—all in service of a reported plan to strip her of her citizenship and deport her. Weissmann, lead prosecutor in Robert S. Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office from 2017 to 2019 and chief of the Fraud Section in the Department of Justice from 2015 to 2019, walks Dahlia through what is shaping up to be another case of selective and vindictive prosecution, why it violates the department's own 60-day election rule, and what it signals when post-Watergate guardrails established to prevent exactly these kinds of abuses have been dismantled.Weissmann and Lithwick also discuss the administration's lawsuit against California over mail-in ballots—a case in which the evidence, like every prior non-citizen voting claim, collapses under scrutiny but serves its purpose before the courts can intervene. Plus: Trump’s ballroom grift, and why the only thing standing between another mid-term presidential pardon spree and total impunity for all the president’s men might be state criminal law.Andrew Weissmann is a professor of practice at NYU School of Law, legal analyst for MSNOW, and author of Liar's Kingdom: How to Stop Trump's Deceit and Save America.Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 40m 20s | ||||||
| 10/10/26 | Grab Them by the Constitution | Donald Trump brags about his boundless freedom while the same Supreme Court that handed him that power has curtailed everyone else's. Confidence in the court has cratered to historic lows, and waiting for a justice to retire is not actually a plan. Could a “shadow court”––a body set up to critique and even to rival SCOTUS—rescue democracy?In her new book, The Shadow Court: Rescuing Democracy from the Supreme Court, Fordham law professor Julie Suk argues that the court isn't just making some bad decisions—it's working exactly as designed. Drawing on constitutional courts in democracies around the world that rebuilt the rule of law after falling to fascism and authoritarianism, Suk outlines a bold institutional answer: a shadow court that would issue advisory opinions on the same issues the Supreme Court decides, giving lawmakers and the public a concrete alternative to judicial supremacy.Dahlia and Julie also discuss how America’s legal and constitutional systems continue to fail women (also by design), from the stalled Equal Rights Amendment to Justice Alito's claim that women's reliance on Roe was merely "abstract"—and why the path to real change might run through state ratifying conventions, rather than state and federal institutions that have failed to reform themselves.Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. If you’ve been peering longingly through the steamed-up windows of the Amicus Plus smokeless cigar bar—your finger hovering over that “subscribe to Slate Plus” button—now is the time to join. For a limited time (like, until Oct. 16), you can join Slate Plus for 50 percent off and get bonus episodes of Amicus. You’ll also enjoy ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts and unlimited reading on Slate.com. Visit slate.com/amicusplus and use the promo code AMICUS50 to receive the discount AND get access wherever you listen. Support what we do and help us absolutely crush it during Slate’s 30th anniversary pledge drive! Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 53m 07s | ||||||
| 10/3/26 | Cruel and Unusual, Bought and Paid For | This week, the Supreme Court blessed the torture of a condemned woman, and the court is set to kick off the new term by doing fossil fuel's bidding. So here at Amicus, we’re not really in the mood for a razzle-dazzle “curtain raiser.” Instead, we’re taking a clear-eyed look at the ways the Roberts court is pulling the constitutional rug out from under the American people. First, Dahlia is joined by Corinna Barrett Lain, author of Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection, to discuss the botched execution of Christa Pike. After the Supreme Court overturned a last-minute stay without explanation, Tennessee attempted to execute Pike by lethal injection—twice. She survived and was taken to hospital where doctors tried to save her life. She was unconscious and on a ventilator at the time of writing. Professor Lain explains how lethal injection's medicalized facade hides state violence, why the court keeps green-lighting botched protocols, and what Pike's case reveals about a system that executes the broken and the poor while sparing those who can afford good lawyers.Then, Dahlia speaks with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island about the Supreme Court's new term and its fossil-fuel patrons. They discuss the Suncor v. Boulder climate case, the flotilla of billionaire-funded front groups filing amicus briefs to signal the court's captured justices. Should we be optimistic that Alito has recused himself from the case that opens the term? Sen. Whitehouse says it is unlikely that decision reflects any sort of come-to-Jesus moment. It suggests instead that, if the Democrats take power in the midterms, the Supreme Court’s internal practices must be investigated. Although his peers are longing to return to regular, orderly government, the senator says “there has to be a reset.” Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. If you’ve been peering through the steamed up windows of the Amicus Plus smokeless cigar bar longingly, hovering over that “subscribe to Slate Plus” button. Now is the time to join. For a limited time (like, until October 16th), you can join Slate Plus for 50 percent off and get bonus episodes of Amicus, like this one. You’ll also enjoy ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts and unlimited reading on Slate.com. Visit slate.com/amicusplus and use the promo code AMICUS50 to receive the discount AND get access wherever you listen. Support what we do and help us absolutely crush it during Slate’s 30th anniversary pledge drive! Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 1h 13m 56s | ||||||
| 9/26/26 | Everybody Out of the Pool | President Trump announced on Truth Social that he was banning CNN, Politico, and MSNow from the White House because he didn't like their coverage. Within days, a federal judge ordered the outlets be reinstated—but the White House dragged its feet. Hours later, reporters were still locked out and a state dinner with President Xi of China went ahead without them. Jameel Jaffer of the Knight First Amendment Institute joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain the First Amendment and due-process arguments at the heart of the case, why the administration's national security justification fell apart in court, and what it means when a president seems indifferent to judicial orders. Together, they trace the broader pattern of press intimidation, including this administration's recent bans on the Associated Press and on Pentagon reporters. And, they discuss something new: news organizations standing together in solidarity for the first time, and why Jaffer thinks we're already living in an authoritarian moment—whether we've noticed or not.Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 46m 29s | ||||||
| 9/19/26 | One Ballot After Another | You’ve seen the headlines about the lists, the claims, the THREE times this same executive order about voting by mail has gone to the Supreme Court. But is Trump’s interference with mail-in voting settled—at least with respect to the midterms? Our go-to election law expert, Richard Hasen of UCLA School of Law, joins Dahlia to unpack what just happened and how this postal chaos alters voters’ sense of election security. We’re calling this discussion “information” and not “catastrophizing.” Hasen has this advice for listeners: get out there and vote in-person. Next, Sam Sankar of the environmental-law organization Earthjustice explains why SCOTUS’ longstanding skepticism towards the environment does not make him as pessimistic as one might expect. He also takes us behind the scenes in two environmental cases that will kick off the Supreme Court term in a few weeks, including an appeal over whether the Air Force may continue to blow stuff up over an historic beach in Guam.Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 1h 06m 24s | ||||||
| 9/12/26 | Capitulation Nation | Capitulation under Trump 2.0 has been devastating to the rule of law. To review a couple of lowlights: One of the nation’s leading lawyers, Brad Karp, cut a deal with Donald Trump in the first days of the bully-in-chief’s second administration that turned out to constitute five flabby bullet points on an unsigned piece of paper. Chief Justice John Roberts is pretending the president is a generic Republican. Dahlia Lithwick talks to Jacob Weisberg about his new book, Profiles in Cowardice, which examines the flawed individuals leading institutions that were meant to hold the line in Trump's second term but instead gave up almost instantly. They unpack the law firm Paul, Weiss' capitulation in an "agreement" with Trump that protects nobody, Chief Justice John Roberts' fatal bet that the Supreme Court can preserve its prestige while the Justice Department defies federal judges, and Senate enthusiast Mitch McConnell's self-defeating legacy of remaking a judiciary that empowered a president to sideline the Senate entirely. Dahlia and Jacob also examine the first signs of a countervailing force, from Harvard's refusal to make a deal to the question of what Joint Chiefs chairman Dan Caine will do if tested around the midterms.Jacob Weisberg's book is Profiles in Cowardice: A Study of Collaboration in the Trump Era, published by Penguin Press.Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. | 54m 58s | ||||||
| 9/5/26 | Supreme CourtDonald Trump+4 | Erwin Chemerinsky | Berkeley School of LawMs. magazine+1 | — | Supreme CourtDonald Trump+5 | — | 1h 09m 16s | ||
| 8/29/26 | Supreme CourtNeil Gorsuch+3 | Mark Joseph Stern | SlateAmicus+1 | — | Neil GorsuchSupreme Court+3 | — | 56m 08s | ||
| 8/22/26 | Supreme CourtNeil Gorsuch+3 | — | Slate PlusAcast+3 | — | Supreme CourtNeil Gorsuch+3 | — | 47m 19s | ||
| 8/15/26 | Supreme Court historyNeil Gorsuch+3 | Susan Matthews | SlateSlow Burn+2 | — | Neil GorsuchSupreme Court+5 | — | 39m 55s | ||
| 8/8/26 | constitutional powerSupreme Court+3 | Mark Joseph SternJamelle Bouie | New York TimesSlate+1 | — | constitutionSupreme Court+4 | — | 54m 37s | ||
| 8/1/26 | equal marriageconstitutional interpretation+4 | Marc Solomon | SlateObergefell+1 | — | equal marriageObergefell+5 | — | 45m 55s | ||
| 7/25/26 | legal historycivil rights+5 | Mark Joseph SternLyle Cherneff | Union ArmySlate+1 | Maryland | Elizabeth Turnerlegal battle+7 | — | 40m 52s | ||
| 7/18/26 | judicial supremacyconstitutional interpretation+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | SlateThe People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review | United States | ConstitutionSupreme Court+6 | — | 41m 14s | ||
| 7/11/26 | Supreme Court decisionsjudicial supremacy+4 | Mark Joseph SternSherrilyn Ifill+2 | Supreme CourtVoting Rights Act+4 | — | Supreme Courtjudicial power+6 | — | 1h 00m 48s | ||
| 7/4/26 | Supreme Court decisionshistory in law+4 | Sam BagenstosJed Shugerman | University of MichiganDepartment of Health and Human Services+3 | — | Supreme CourtTrump v. Slaughter+5 | — | 57m 49s | ||
| 6/30/26 | Supreme Court decisionsbirthright citizenship+5 | Mark | Supreme CourtDonald Trump+1 | — | Supreme Courtbirthright citizenship+8 | — | 14m 32s | ||
| 6/29/26 | Supreme Court rulingsTrump administration+4 | — | Federal ReserveRepublican National Committee+2 | — | Supreme CourtTrump+6 | — | 8m 47s | ||
| 6/27/26 | Supreme Court decisionsimmigration law+5 | Mark Joseph SternAndrea Flores | Securing America’s PromiseWhite House+3 | United StatesHaitians | Supreme Courtimmigration+6 | — | 1h 08m 47s | ||
| 6/25/26 | Supreme Court decisionsimmigration+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | Supreme CourtSlate+1 | — | Supreme Courtdecisions+6 | — | 11m 17s | ||
| 6/20/26 | Second Amendmentmarijuana rights+4 | David Gans | Constitutional Accountability CenterStanford Law Review | — | Second Amendmentmarijuana+6 | — | 1h 02m 25s | ||
| 6/13/26 | Supreme Court decisionscivil rights+4 | Pamela S Karlan | Trump administrationJustice Department+4 | — | SCOTUScivil rights laws+6 | — | 48m 04s | ||
| 6/6/26 | voting rightsgerrymandering+4 | Evan MilliganAndrew Weissmann | Supreme CourtDOJ+3 | Alabama | Supreme Courtvoting maps+7 | — | 1h 03m 35s | ||
| 6/3/26 | voting rightsracial gerrymandering+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | Supreme CourtSlate Plus+2 | Alabama | voting rightsSupreme Court+5 | — | 13m 06s | ||
| 5/30/26 | Supreme Court decisionslegal analysis+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | SlateSupreme Court+2 | — | Supreme Courtgerrymandering+6 | — | 1h 04m 21s | ||
| 5/23/26 | Trump settlement fundlegal corruption+4 | J.P. CooneyAndrea Bernstein | IRSThe Law According to Trump+1 | Mar-a-Lago | Trumpsettlement fund+7 | — | 1h 11m 56s | ||
| 5/16/26 | reproductive rightsabortion+5 | Madiba DennieIlyse Hogue | Balls and StrikesNARAL+2 | — | abortion pilltelehealth+5 | — | 1h 07m 06s | ||
| 5/9/26 | judicial threatsjudicial independence+3 | Robert S. LasnikJeremy Fogel | Berkeley Judicial InstituteDepartment of Justice | Western District of WashingtonNorthern District of California | judgesthreats+3 | — | 1h 02m 01s | ||
| 5/2/26 | American democracylegal challenges+3 | Barbara McQuadeMadiba Dennie | Southern Poverty Law CenterSupreme Court+1 | — | James ComeyTrump+4 | — | 1h 03m 15s | ||
| 4/29/26 | voting rightsSupreme Court+5 | Janai Nelson | Legal Defense FundSlate Podcasts | America | voting rightsSupreme Court+6 | — | 8m 22s | ||
| 4/25/26 | First Amendmentdefamation suits+4 | Margaret Sullivan | The AtlanticNew York Times+2 | — | MAGAmedia+6 | — | 1h 03m 43s | ||
| 4/18/26 | democracyTrumpism+4 | Norm Eisen | democracydefendersfund.org | HungaryUnited States+1 | democracyTrumpism+5 | — | 54m 21s | ||
| 4/11/26 | impeachment25th Amendment+4 | Rep. Jamie RaskinProfessor Michael Gerhardt | Slate PodcastsApple Podcasts+2 | — | impeachment25th Amendment+5 | — | 1h 06m 12s | ||
| 4/4/26 | Trump administrationDepartment of Justice+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | Department of JusticeSlate Plus | — | Pam BondiDonald Trump+5 | — | 53m 03s | ||
| 4/1/26 | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+4 | Mark Joseph SternEvan Bernick | Slate PlusSupreme Court+6 | — | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+5 | — | 5m 04s | ||
| 3/28/26 | democracyTrump+4 | Ian Bassin | Protect DemocracySCOTUS+2 | — | democracyTrump+8 | — | 53m 31s | ||
| 3/21/26 | Supreme Courtlegal analysis+4 | Mark Joseph Stern | Constitutional Accountability CenterSlate | One, First Street | Supreme Courtshadow docket+5 | — | 53m 37s | ||
| 3/14/26 | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+4 | Anna O. Law | Slate PodcastsMigration and the Origins of American Citizenship+1 | — | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+5 | — | 51m 06s | ||
| 3/7/26 | Christian nationalismSupreme Court+5 | Rachel Laser | Americans United for Separation of Church and StateAmicus | America | Christian nationalismSupreme Court+5 | — | 49m 36s | ||
| 3/2/26 | TrumpIran+5 | Mark Joseph SternEugene Fidell | Yale Law SchoolSlate Plus+1 | IranAmerican | TrumpIran+5 | — | 7m 46s | ||
Showing 40 of 483
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Similar Audience Demographics
Podcasts that attract a similar listener profile
Chart history for Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
Peaked at #87 in United States, currently #87 in United States.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | — | #87 | #87 | — |
| TH | — | #163 | #163 | — |
| IS | — | #197 | #197 | — |
Chart Positions
3 placements across 3 markets.
Chart Positions
3 placements across 3 markets.