Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Est. Listeners
Based on iTunes & Spotify (publisher stats).
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
10,001 - 25,000 - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
25,001 - 75,000 - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
5,001 - 15,000
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
Recent episodes
Antitrust 101: City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor, 499 US 365 (1991)
Apr 24, 2026
Unknown duration
Antitrust 101: Advocate/North Shore
Apr 10, 2026
Unknown duration
Antitrust 101: Noerr Pennington Doctrine
Mar 27, 2026
Unknown duration
Antitrust 101: Toys R Us v. FTC, 221 F.3d 928 (2000)
Mar 13, 2026
Unknown duration
Antitrust 101: Brooke Group v. B&W Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209 (1993)
Feb 27, 2026
Unknown duration
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Description | Length | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/24/26 | Antitrust 101: City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor, 499 US 365 (1991) | This grab bag of antitrust immunities is a perfect case to help fill out what listeners have learned from Parker v. Brown, Noerr, and others. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Isabella Pitt as we talk about this important issue and Queen Elizabeth I's playing card monopoly. | — | ||||||
| 4/10/26 | Antitrust 101: Advocate/North Shore | How do you properly define a geographic market in a hospital merger? Is this question drier than fruitcake? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guest Jen Foley as they discuss Federal Trade Commission and State of Illinois v. Advocate Health Care Network, 841 F.3d 460 (7th Cir. 2016). | — | ||||||
| 3/27/26 | Antitrust 101: Noerr Pennington Doctrine | What is protected petitioning conduct and what is just a plain old conspiracy? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Columbia Law Student Ludovica Barba for a discussion of both the Noerr and Pennington cases. | — | ||||||
| 3/13/26 | Antitrust 101: Toys R Us v. FTC, 221 F.3d 928 (2000) | Why would a manufacturer agree to close off a promising business line? Sometimes it's because there is a hub and spoke conspiracy afoot. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Jeff Dan Herrerra for a discussion about Barbies, Power Rangers, and other diversions. | — | ||||||
| 2/27/26 | Antitrust 101: Brooke Group v. B&W Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209 (1993) | Why don't you ever hear about predatory pricing cases anymore? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Vermont Law Student and student contest runner up Julia Wickham for a discussion about pricing below defendants costs, recoupment, and the impossibility of proving these elements. | — | ||||||
| 2/13/26 | Antitrust 101: United States v. Marine Bancorporation, 418 US 602 (1974) | What is the difference between actual potential competition or perceived potential competition? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guests Katherine Krems and Victoria Field for an episode about this tongue twisting antitrust doctrine. | — | ||||||
| 1/30/26 | Antitrust 101: American Needle v. NFL, 560 US 183 (2010) | Can the NFL work together on apparel licensure or does that violate the antitrust laws? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Antitrust 101 Student Contest Winner Lucas Hayes, a 2L at BYU, for this discussion about when a joint venture is coordinated v. independent economic action. | — | ||||||
| 1/16/26 | Antitrust 101: Copperweld | Can a company conspire with itself? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley in the new semester of Antitrust 101 as she and Andrea Terreones of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, runner-up in the law student contest, discuss Copperweld v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 US 752 (1984). | — | ||||||
| 1/2/26 | Holiday Special: Gwendolyn's Top Tips | Why is Civil Procedure the most important antitrust class you can take? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley as she shares her top tips for new lawyers and law students in this holiday special. | — | ||||||
| 12/19/25 | Antitrust 101: BMI v. CBS, 441 US 1 (1979) | Are there bright line rules in antitrust- even about price fixing?Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and frequent contributor Matt Michaloski for their in-depth discussion about the various ways courts analyze price fixing cases. | — | ||||||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 12/5/25 | Antitrust 101: Eastman Kodak | Can you have market power in the aftermarket even if you don't have market power in the original market? That's Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services, 504 US 451 (1992), as we hear from host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guest Zach Biesanz, Minnesota Senior Enforcement Counsel. | — | ||||||
| 11/21/25 | Antitrust 101: US v. Microsoft Part One: Tying, Foreclosure, and Causation | This case is a big deal and is top of mind for many current tech cases. Host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley welcomes special guest Jon Sallet, Colorado Special Assistant Attorney General, to discuss this pivotal tech decision and its holdings on tying, foreclosure, and causation. | — | ||||||
| 11/7/25 | Antitrust 101: Brown Shoe | What is the difference between the Brown Shoe Factors and the Brown Shoe Practical Indicia? Come find out on Antitrust 101 with host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and special guest Shaoul Sussman. | — | ||||||
| 10/24/25 | Antitrust 101: Indirect Purchasers | What's one key difference between state and federal antitrust law? Indirect purchaser authority. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley as she discusses Illinois Brick and Hanover Shoe and the evolution of "pass on" theories. | — | ||||||
| 10/10/25 | Antitrust 101: Pabst/Blatz, not just for happy hour. | Cheers, listeners! Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and her guests Katherine Krems from the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office and Victoria Field of the Connecticut Attorney General’s Office as they discuss US v. Pabst Brewing Company, 384 US 546 (1966). This decision has everything: consolidated beer markets, dystopian fantasies, and foreshadowing to the 2023 Merger Guidelines Number 7. | — | ||||||
| 9/26/25 | Antitrust 101: Tampa Electric v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 US 320 (1961) | When is a requirements contract a violation of Clayton Act §3? Not this time! Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Utah Assistant Attorney General Matt Michaloski as they dig for the seams of this coal case. | — | ||||||
| 9/12/25 | Antitrust 101: Chicago Board of Trade v. US, 246 US 231 (1918) | What are the origins of the Rule of Reason? This is one of the cases that created full employment for the antitrust bar. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and student contest winner Johannes Alvarez-Rivero for their insights on why after-market bid restrictions are one of the first to be booted out from under the Sherman Act for their reasonableness. | — | ||||||
| 8/29/25 | Summer School: Robinson Patman | How far would you go to get some elderflower liqueur? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guest Nic Stebinger to learn a bit about price discrimination, why it’s illegal, and just enough to kind of know what you are talking about at cocktail parties. Cheers to the end of summer school! | — | ||||||
| 8/15/25 | Antitrust 101: California v. American Stores, 495 US 271 (1990) | Ignore the States at your peril, merging parties! Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and her guest, Elizabeth Maxeiner, Illinois Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Chief, as they discuss this Supreme Court case that enshrines the divestiture remedy in private enforcement actions. | — | ||||||
| 8/1/25 | Antitrust 101: California v. Arc America, 490 US 93 (1989) | Is State Antitrust Enforcement really the supreme antitrust enforcement? It’s certainly the oldest. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and special guest Washington Assistant Attorney General Rachel Lumen as they discuss the Supreme Court’s decision about indirect purchaser authority in California v. Arc America. | — | ||||||
| 7/18/25 | Antitrust 101: Commissioner Mark Meador | Come join Commissioner Mark Meador and host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley for a wide-ranging conversation about antitrust as a Conservative project, the revival of early termination, and the future of antitrust enforcement in the Trump Administration. | — | ||||||
| 7/4/25 | Summer School: European Vacation and Article 102 | Is Article 102 the twin or the younger sibling of Sherman Act §2? Join Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and her special guest, Ori Schwartz, the OECD’s Head of Competition Division as they take a summer vacation to Europe and talk about the ways that these siblings get along in today’s world. | — | ||||||
| 6/20/25 | Antitrust 101: Humphrey’s Executor, 295 US 602 (1935) | There are a lot of opinions about Humphrey’s Executor, but what is the case actually about? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and former Federal Trade Commission Chairman Maureen Ohlhausen as they discuss what the Supreme Court said about firing Federal Trade Commissioners. | — | ||||||
| 6/6/25 | Antitrust 101 Summer School: Clayton Act | Want a quick overview of the Clayton Act? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and her guest, Matt Michaloski for a light summer lemonade version of the statute’s history and its major provisions. | — | ||||||
| 5/23/25 | Antitrust 101: Leegin v. PSKS, 551 US 877 (2007) | Was this the beginning of the end of stare decisis? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and New York Assistant Attorneys General Bob Hubbard and Isabella Pitt for a discussion about the game-changing Leegin RPM decision. | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 34
Sponsor Intelligence
Sign in to see which brands sponsor this podcast, their ad offers, and promo codes.
Chart Positions
2 placements across 2 markets.
Chart Positions
2 placements across 2 markets.