
At Peace Parents Podcast
by Casey
Is this your podcast?On the show
From 28 epsHost
Recent guests
Recent episodes
The Theory of Change Behind PDA Accommodations: Why Lowering Demands Is Not Enough | Ep. 184
Oct 13, 2026
15m 36s
PDA and School: Patterns, Advocacy, and Accommodations With Dr. Alex Klein | Ep. 183
Oct 6, 2026
1h 02m 34s
To School or Not to School: A Decision Making Framework for Parents of PDA Children and Teens | Ep. 182
Sep 29, 2026
1h 09m 21s
Screens Are Not So Scary, Reducing Autonomy Is: Restoring Childhood With Dr. Peter Gray | Ep. 181
Sep 22, 2026
1h 59m 01s
Education and PDA at a Sudbury School: A Conversation With Bryer Newlin | Ep. 180
Sep 15, 2026
51m 14s
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Blended from 1 signal.
Built from
By chart position
- 🇺🇸United States · ParentingHOME#5425K to 156K
- 🇨🇦Canada · Parenting#242.7K to 17K
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom · Parenting#571.6K to 10K
- 🇦🇺Australia · Parenting#56828 to 5.2K
- 🇩🇪Germany · Parenting#81684 to 4.3K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
34K to 210K🎙 Daily cadence·178 episodes·Last published 5d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
112K to 699K🇺🇸74%🇨🇦8%🇬🇧5%+9 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
45K to 280K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/26 | The Theory of Change Behind PDA Accommodations: Why Lowering Demands Is Not Enough | Ep. 184 | Why do accommodations like lowering demands, providing autonomy, and using declarative language actually work for PDA children and teens over the long term? And why do so many parents, therapists, and teachers get stuck applying them even when they understand the concept?In this episode, an excerpt from a live workshop I taught in 2024, I walk through what I call the theory of change for PDA: the logic that explains why these accommodations shift things at a nervous system level. I cover the two most common places where people get stuck, how to tell the difference between an accommodation and a reward, and why lowering demands alone is necessary but not sufficient for the transformation families are working toward. Key Takeaways What Accommodations Are Actually Doing in the Nervous System | 00:00:00 Accommodations for PDA children and teens serve three functions. They keep the child in the thinking brain rather than the survival brain, where learning, empathy, cause and effect, and connection can actually happen. They create new neural pathways back to the thinking brain over time, so the nervous system has more options than dysregulation. And they bring down cumulative nervous system activation below the threshold of tolerance so that the behaviors of avoidance, opposition, and shutdown begin to reduce. None of this happens in a single session or a single week. It is a long-term, cumulative shift in the opposite direction from the long-term, cumulative activation that brought the family to this point.The Most Common Sticking Point - One: Removing Accommodations When Things Improve | 00:04:01 My son is out of burnout. He plays tackle football. He is thriving at a private school and we are doing things as a family again that we could not do for years. I am still bringing him food on the couch while he watches his iPad. I am still intensively accommodating him. That is not a contradiction. It is the reason things are going well. When families remove accommodations because the child seems regulated, the cumulative nervous system activation begins to build again, and what looked like progress reverses. The accommodations are what is keeping his nervous system below the threshold. They do not disappear when things improve. They are what made things improve.The Most Common Sticking Point - Two: Using an Accommodation to Get a Behavior | 00:07:32 When I first learned declarative language, I started saying things like "I noticed you still have apples on your plate," but the energy behind it was to get my son to eat the apple. A PDA nervous system can detect that. The amygdala is always scanning for whether someone is placing themselves above as the decider, and it will pick up on the intention underneath the words even when the words have changed. An accommodation used to achieve compliance is not an accommodation. It is a repackaged demand. This is one of the most common places I see families getting stuck even after months of learning the framework.The Transition Treat: Accommodation Versus Reward | 00:09:09 My son gets a Twix before every car transition to school, regardless of whether he gets in the car. That is an accommodation, not a reward. A reward is contingent on compliance: do the thing, get the treat. An accommodation is given regardless: here is a dopamine support for this moment of transition, whether or not you can get in the car today. The distinction matters because a contingent reward carries the energy of an expectation, which activates the PDA threat response. A non-contingent accommodation does not. This is one of the clearest practical examples I have of what the shift from behavioral to autonomy-based logic actually looks like in daily life.Lowering Demands Is Necessary but Not Sufficient | 00:11:00 Lowering demands is a powerful and necessary starting point, but it is not the whole picture. What I have seen across hundreds of families is that the full transformation, the one where the relationship shifts from avoidant and oppositional to collaborative and trusting, requires both the baseline of accommodation and the shift in the relational dynamic. A child or teen who feels genuine felt safety on a subconscious level, who trusts that the adult will not push them past their threshold, is a child who can eventually begin to lead their own learning, try new things, and ask for help. That trust is built through consistency over time, not through any single accommodation or technique.Relevant Resources Paradigm Shift Program — My signature program where the theory of change described in this episode is practiced as an embodied skill across twelve weeks, with live coaching to help parents move from understanding the logic to applying it consistently in daily life.Mentioned in this episode:Free Live WorkshopI'm offering a free live workshop this month: "Supporting your PDA child or teen through burnout without breaking yourself in the process."Free Live Workshop Registration | 15m 36s | ||||||
| 10/6/26 | PDA and School: Patterns, Advocacy, and Accommodations With Dr. Alex Klein | Ep. 183 | It is back to school season here in the US, and for most families raising PDA children and teens, that means navigating one of the most structurally activating environments their child will ever encounter. I am back with Dr. Alex Klein, clinical psychologist, to talk through what we are each seeing this fall and what we have learned over years of working with and being parents of neurodivergent children.In this episode we cover how to understand PDA as it plays out in school, why masking is real and why schools often do not believe parents, how to communicate about a PDA child's needs without leading with a label that gets dismissed, and the highest impact accommodations Dr. Klein and I have each found to be worth fighting for. We also talk honestly about what happens when schools are not allies and what families can do when the onus falls almost entirely on the parent.Key TakeawaysPDA Is Not Always the Only Root Cause | 00:03:16 Dr. Klein names something I think about constantly in my own family this fall: demand avoidance in a school setting is often multifaceted. A child may be avoiding writing because of the PDA autonomy mechanism, but also because of boredom, executive functioning challenges, sensory fatigue, or the cumulative depletion of a full school week. Peeling back the layers to understand which root cause is driving which behavior is more useful than asking only whether the child is PDA or not. This is how I am thinking about my younger son William in his fourth week back at Montessori, tracking separately what seems like activation and what seems like sensory overwhelm or skill gap.Why the Coke Bottle Dynamic Does Not Mean School Is Fine | 00:10:00 When a child masks at school and comes home and falls apart, schools often interpret this as evidence that the problem is at home. Dr. Klein names what is actually happening: the child is getting shaken up all day, and home is where they finally feel safe enough to release the pressure. For my older son this was explosive and visible. For my younger son it was shutdown and hygiene challenges. Both are the same nervous system mechanism. The child showing all parts of themselves with the people they feel safest with is not a sign that something is wrong at home. It is a sign that home is the place where the nervous system can finally stop suppressing.What to Say When the School Does Not Know What PDA Is | 00:33:50 When advocating in a school setting, leading with the PDA label often produces dismissal because it is not in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and most educators have not been trained on it. Dr. Klein and I both give families permission to frame their child's needs through diagnoses the school already recognizes, often autism and ADHD, and to speak in plain language about what has happened historically when accommodations were not in place. Connecting the absence of specific accommodations to specific outcomes the school can observe - attendance, meltdown frequency, basic needs access - is more effective than trying to explain the nervous system mechanism from scratch.The Relationship First Approach: More Important Than Compliance | 00:49:56 Dr. Klein names what he considers one of the highest impact accommodations for PDA children in any school setting: prioritizing the relationship between a staff member and the child above compliance with the task. A child who feels genuinely seen and safe with a teacher will access far more learning than a child who is being managed toward behavioral compliance. This is not a soft principle. It is the mechanism through which a PDA nervous system can actually stay regulated enough to be in the room. I have seen this play out in my own family across multiple school years: a single teacher who intuitively adjusted made the difference between access and exclusion.The Two Accommodations Worth Fighting for Most | 00:53:00 If I could give every family in a public school two accommodations, they would be these. First, non-punitive measures for attendance: no threats of truancy, no marks on a permanent record for arriving late or leaving early, no calls from CPS because a kindergartener could not get through a Zoom without being physically restrained. Second, no homework, or at minimum, no punitive consequences for not completing it. These children already have a full-time job managing their nervous system in an environment that is structurally activating. The evening needs to be recovery, not more demand. Both of these are workable asks that do not require schools to understand PDA. They require schools to trust the parent.Relevant ResourcesDr. Alex Klein — Dr. Klein's website, where families and clinicians can learn more about his work supporting neurodivergent children, teens, and their families.Paradigm Shift Program — My signature program where the advocacy framework, cost-benefit decision making, and the full accommodation toolkit Dr. Klein and I discuss in this episode are taught across twelve weeks of live coaching.Mentioned in this episode:Free Live WorkshopI'm offering a free live workshop this month: "Supporting your PDA child or teen through burnout without breaking yourself in the process."Free Live Workshop Registration | 1h 02m 34s | ||||||
| 9/29/26 | To School or Not to School: A Decision Making Framework for Parents of PDA Children and Teens | Ep. 182 | Should my PDA child stay in the public school system, move to a private school, or homeschool? There is no single answer, and this episode is not going to give you one. What it is going to give you is a framework for making the decision that fits your child, your constraints, and this specific season of your family.In this episode I walk through all five characteristics of PDA as they play out in a school or home setting, then move into the three schooling scenarios I see families navigate most: staying in the public school system and advocating for accommodations, finding a private school that is structurally more aligned with a PDA nervous system, and pulling your child out entirely to unschool, deschool, or homeschool. For each one I share what to watch for, what has worked for the families I have coached, and how to use the cost-benefit framework to make and hold a decision even when it is hard.Key TakeawaysWhy Traditional School Is Structurally Activating and What That Looks Like | 00:01:42 Traditional schools are designed to standardize: every child doing the same thing at the same time in the same way. For a PDA nervous system, that structure produces continuous perceived losses of autonomy, and the behavioral expression of that activation, whether it is equalizing behavior in the classroom or a collapse at home after a day of masking, is what most families are already living with when they find me. What I want parents to understand is that the equalizing and collapse is not defiance. It is not willfulness. It is a nervous system doing exactly what it is wired to do when it perceives repeated losses of autonomy and equality.Advocating in the Public School System: Be Strategic, Not Educational | 00:33:27 When advocating for a PDA child in a US public school, leading with the PDA label rarely works. I give families permission to describe their child as high functioning autistic with severe anxiety or a nervous system disability, using language that the people in the room already have a framework for. From there, the most effective tool is the PLATO nonviolent communication framework: making one specific, granular request that includes a person, location, action, time, and object, so the school can only say yes, no, or propose an alternative. Each answer is data, not a defeat. What to Look for in a Private School and Which Models Have Worked | 00:42:38 The question I ask every private school when evaluating fit is: does every child have to do the same thing at the same time in the same way? The models that have worked most consistently for families I have coached are Montessori and Reggio Emilia for their mixed-age classrooms, built-in choice, and absence of homework and grades; Sudbury Democratic Schools for their consent-based, student-governed structure; and trauma-informed schools that do not default to exposure as the primary intervention for anxiety. Even within the public system, some charter schools and schools of choice have been workable when a parent has been able to build a genuine relationship with specific staff.Unschooling Is Not Independent Play: The Four Regulating States | 00:53:59 The most common mistake families make when they begin unschooling is assuming the child will go off and self-direct once the external structure is removed. What I observe is that PDA children need nervous system scaffolding to engage with anything. The four regulating states that help during this period are screens, another safe nervous system offering undivided attention, special interest or flow, and dopamine-intense or sensory-seeking activity. If a child is in burnout, they may only be able to access two of these. Starting there, without expectation or timeline, is the beginning of recovery, not a sign that unschooling is failing.Strewing, Declarative Language, and Letting Go of the Timeline | 00:54:42 The three tools I return to most consistently with unschooling families are strewing, declarative language, and releasing the timeline. Strewing means leaving things out in the environment that the child can engage with or not, without expectation. Declarative language replaces direct questions and imperatives with observational statements so the child retains autonomy over whether and how to engage. And letting go of the timeline is the hardest but most necessary piece, because a parent's urgency about reading, socialization, or catching up is itself perceived by the PDA nervous system as an agenda, which activates the very resistance we are trying to reduce.Relevant ResourcesParadigm Shift Program — My signature program where the five-characteristic framework, cost-benefit decision making, the PLATO advocacy tool, and the full unschooling and accommodation approach described in this episode are taught across twelve weeks of live coaching.Mentioned in this episode:Free Live WorkshopI'm offering a free live workshop this month: "Supporting your PDA child or teen through burnout without breaking yourself in the process."Free Live Workshop Registration | 1h 09m 21s | ||||||
| 9/22/26 | Screens Are Not So Scary, Reducing Autonomy Is: Restoring Childhood With Dr. Peter Gray | Ep. 181 | Why are so many children and teens struggling with anxiety, depression, and school refusal right now? And why are so many of them PDA? I have been carrying these questions for years, and Dr. Peter Gray's new book Restoring Childhood gave me a framework I did not have before.Dr. Peter Gray is a research professor of psychology and neuroscience at Boston College, founder of the nonprofit Let Grow, and author of Free to Learn and, just published this month, Restoring Childhood, How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety. In this episode we talk about what play actually is and why it matters for development, why the evidence does not support that screens and social media are the primary driver of the youth mental health crisis, and what has actually been happening to children's autonomy and mental health since the 1950s. We also talk about his own son, who he believes would have been identified as PDA, and how that son changed the entire trajectory of Dr. Gray's research and writing.Key TakeawaysWhat Play Actually Is and Why Screens Can Count | 00:11:41 Dr. Gray defines play through four characteristics: it is self-chosen and self-directed, intrinsically motivated, structured by the players themselves, and always creative within that structure. By this definition, when my younger son spent ten to twelve hours a day in Minecraft during burnout, starting alone and gradually inviting his dad, then friends, and setting all the rules collectively, that was play. Dr. Gray affirms this directly: children are amazing at knowing what they need, and digital spaces can function as genuine play spaces when children have control over what they do there and with whom.The Youth Mental Health Crisis Started Decades Before Social Media | 00:34:23 The data shows a steady, nearly linear increase in anxiety, depression, and suicide among school-aged children in the United States from 1950 to 1990, long before smartphones existed. Every major meta-analysis of the hundreds of studies testing the social media hypothesis shows either no meaningful correlation, or a small one that washes out across the full literature. What the cross-national data does show is that countries where schooling became more pressurized and narrow around the same time saw similar increases in youth mental health struggles, while countries that did not make those changes did not. This is not a social media story. It is an autonomy story.Why School Is the Most Consistent Source of Stress for Children | 01:06:26 Every study Dr. Gray has found where a demographically balanced sample of school-aged children are asked to name their primary source of stress places school at the top. Pediatric mental health admissions are approximately twice as high during the school year as when school is not in session. The No Child Left Behind Act and the subsequent adoption of Common Core around 2010 narrowed the curriculum, removed teacher discretion, and replaced intrinsic engagement with test preparation, making school significantly more stressful at exactly the moment when youth mental health data began declining again.Why PDA Children May Have Always Existed but Only Now Reach Burnout | 01:18:30 Dr. Gray's model of a narrowing channel helps me understand something I am asked constantly: why did PDA traits that existed in prior generations not produce the burnout, school refusal, and basic needs collapse I see across thousands of families today? If a child with a strong survival drive for autonomy is living in a society with more space for that autonomy, through outdoor play, age-mixed peer groups, and less compliance-based schooling, the nervous system is not accumulating the same load. As the channel for all children has narrowed across every decade since the 1950s, the children with the most sensitive neuroception for autonomy loss are the first and hardest hit.Autonomy-Supportive Parenting and What It Asks of Us | 01:31:49 Dr. Gray introduces the concept of autonomy-supportive parenting, which goes beyond simply trusting a child to also creating conditions for independence in a world that is working against it. This means asking a child what they would like to do independently that they have not yet tried, negotiating a first step, and walking with them toward it rather than waiting for the world to cooperate. It also means examining the reflexive fears that our culture has conditioned into us about what is dangerous for children, and distinguishing genuine risk from moral panic.Relevant Resources Restoring Childhood — Dr. Gray's new book, available September 15, on why the youth mental health crisis predates social media and what actually needs to change for children to thrive.Paradigm Shift Program — My signature program where the autonomy-supportive approach Dr. Gray describes is practiced as a daily skill, alongside cost-benefit decision making and the full accommodation framework.Mentioned in this episode:Free Live WorkshopI'm offering a free live workshop this month: "Supporting your PDA child or teen through burnout without breaking yourself in the process."Free Live Workshop Registration | 1h 59m 01s | ||||||
| 9/15/26 | Education and PDA at a Sudbury School: A Conversation With Bryer Newlin | Ep. 180 | What if a school had no mandatory classes, no grades, no homework, and no age segregation, and instead gave students a genuine vote in how the school runs? That is the Sudbury Democratic model, and it offers some real benefits for PDA children and teens.In this episode I speak with Bryer Newlin, a youth rights and disability justice advocate, self-identified PDA adult, and staff member at Clearwater School in Seattle. We talk about what it means to experience autonomy as a bodily sense, how equalizing behavior is translated in a school setting rather than punished, why clean up can be a can't rather than a won't, and what the misconception of no rules really misses about how democratic schools actually work.Key TakeawaysAutonomy as a Bodily Sense: How Bryer Understands Their Own PDA | 00:04:47 Bryer describes PDA as having an additional sense in the body, a felt sense of how much autonomy is present in any given moment. This is not a cognitive evaluation but a somatic one, which means declarative language alone is not enough if the energy underneath still carries an agenda. A PDA nervous system can detect when someone is walking on eggshells to disguise a demand. This is why the shift the PDA lens requires has to become embodied rather than just intellectual, for parents and educators alike.What the Sudbury Democratic Model Is and Why It May Fit PDA Nervous Systems | 00:08:32 Clearwater School has no mandatory classes, no grades, no tests, no homework, and no age segregation. Students and staff together vote on school rules, room usage, and daily structures in what is called school meeting. What makes this a natural fit for many PDA children and teens is that intrinsic motivation drives all engagement, children have genuine say in decisions that affect them, and no adult is placed above the child as the authority on what and when to learn. Bryer is also honest about what remains hard: the democratic structure still generates demands, conflict between students requires navigation, and two PDA students in the same space can struggle significantly before finding their way to each other.Translating Equalizing Behavior Instead of Reacting to It | 00:12:17 When a student held water over a school computer and threatened to pour it on, Bryer heard something different: I am scared you are going to kick me out of school, so I am going to try to get kicked out first to have more control. Responding to what was actually being communicated changed the entire interaction. Bryer also names the everyday version of this that happens in families: when a child asking for something is told to say please first, they are placed in a doubly vulnerable position, already below as the asker and now required to go further below before the need is met. For a PDA nervous system, that is two layers of activation at once.Can't Versus Won't and Why Allowing a Messy Child May Produce a Cleaner Adult | 00:30:40 When Bryer allows a PDA student to opt out of cleanup, the fear is always the same: you are creating an entitled adult. What Bryer has observed is the opposite. Forcing cleanup when the nervous system cannot access it produces trauma around the task and long-term avoidance. Releasing the expectation allows the child to develop their own relationship to it over time. Bryer names this as the heart of the can't versus won't distinction: believing a child when they say they cannot, even when physical capacity appears to be present, because the invisible walls of cumulative demand load may mean this particular thing cannot be scaled right now.What Parents and Teachers Can Take Into Any Setting | 00:42:32 Bryer's message to parents navigating school refusal and fear of learning loss is direct: the time spent genuinely understanding and valuing a child's interests is a far stronger predictor of long-term success than attendance records. For teachers within public school constraints, Bryer names two starting points: learn what equalizing behavior is and what it is actually communicating, and give accommodations even when you suspect the child could physically comply, because cumulative demand load may mean they simply cannot right now. When a PDA child asks for an accommodation, Bryer reminds us, they are already doing something extremely vulnerable: willingly placing themselves below. That deserves to be met.Relevant ResourcesClearwater School — The Seattle-area Sudbury Democratic School where Bryer works, offering a student-directed, democratic learning environment for families in Washington state and available for consultation for out-of-state families as well.Hollow Earth Radio — Bryer's radio show airs every second Sunday at 2PM on KHUH FM, featuring themed music sets and available to stream online.Queer COVID Cautious Creatives on Instagram — The community arts organization Bryer runs for queer and disabled people in the Pacific Northwest, reachable on Instagram at @queercovidcautiouscreativesParadigm Shift Program — My signature program where the embodied shift from demand-based to autonomy-based interaction is practiced as a skill over twelve weeks, alongside the full accommodation framework and live coachingMentioned in this episode:Free Live WorkshopI'm offering a free live workshop this month: "Supporting your PDA child or teen through burnout without breaking yourself in the process."Free Live Workshop Registration | 51m 14s | ||||||
| 9/8/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceschool systems+3 | — | Miami Sudbury Democratic School | — | Pathological Demand AvoidancePDA+5 | — | 30m 44s | ||
| 9/1/26 | PDA child educationtrust in schooling+4 | Melissa PetroChela Crane+1 | Otto Specht School | New York | PDAeducation+7 | — | 1h 12m 01s | ||
| 8/25/26 | PDA parentingfamily dynamics+4 | Justin | fart pillsParadigm Shift Program | Ohio | PDAparenting+7 | — | 48m 58s | ||
| 8/18/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidancebasic needs+6 | — | University of Michigan | — | PDAbasic needs struggles+8 | — | 18m 09s | ||
| 8/11/26 | Pathological Demand AvoidanceAutism+4 | — | PDAMichigan+1 | — | Pathological Demand AvoidanceAutism+5 | — | 23m 19s | ||
| 8/4/26 | PDAnervous system activation+3 | — | — | — | PDAnervous system+5 | — | 18m 00s | ||
| 7/28/26 | parentingPathological Demand Avoidance+4 | — | — | Michigan | Pathological Demand Avoidanceparenting+5 | — | 18m 21s | ||
| 7/21/26 | ShamePathological Demand Avoidance+5 | Dr. Gillian Boudreau | — | — | PDAshame+5 | — | 1h 22m 53s | ||
| 7/14/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceautonomy+3 | — | — | — | PDAdemand avoidance+5 | — | 11m 11s | ||
| 7/7/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceparenting skills+4 | — | — | — | PDA lensparenting+5 | — | 16m 34s | ||
| 6/30/26 | addictionnervous system+4 | Jan Winhall | Felt Sense Polyvagal Model | — | addictionnervous system+5 | — | 53m 21s | ||
| 6/23/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceautonomy+5 | — | — | — | PDAsurvival drive+5 | — | 22m 25s | ||
| 6/16/26 | school advocacyPathological Demand Avoidance+3 | Dr. Destiny Huff | — | — | PDAspecial education+3 | — | 50m 20s | ||
| 6/9/26 | parentingdemand avoidance+3 | — | — | — | PDAdemand avoidant child+3 | — | 53m 59s | ||
| 6/2/26 | PDAneuropsychology+3 | Dr. Jennifer Huffman | Neurodynamic Navigator SystemNeurodynamic Quotient+1 | — | PDAneuropsychologist+3 | — | 1h 03m 09s | ||
| 5/26/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceparenting+4 | Jake | — | — | Pathological Demand Avoidanceparenting change+3 | — | 57m 48s | ||
| 5/19/26 | giftednesspathological demand avoidance+4 | — | — | — | autistic brainpathological demand avoidance+5 | — | 50m 23s | ||
| 5/12/26 | selective mutismpathological demand avoidance+4 | Stephanie Harrigan | Inclusive Minds Educational ConsultingSCERTS+4 | — | selective mutismfeeding therapy+5 | — | 56m 06s | ||
| 5/5/26 | occupational therapyrestrictive eating+3 | — | SOS feeding protocoloccupational therapy+1 | — | restrictive eatingoccupational therapy+3 | — | 47m 36s | ||
| 4/28/26 | autonomyrestrictive eating+3 | — | — | — | PDAeating struggles+3 | — | 52m 38s | ||
| 4/21/26 | eating misconceptionspathological demand avoidance+3 | — | — | — | PDAeating+6 | — | 51m 18s | ||
| 4/14/26 | eating strugglespathological demand avoidance+4 | — | MontessoriSOS feeding protocol+3 | — | eatingfood refusal+7 | — | 37m 58s | ||
| 4/7/26 | Pathological Demand Avoidanceparenting+3 | Danielle | South Korea | North Idaho | PDAADHD+3 | — | 56m 15s | ||
| 3/31/26 | radical acceptancePathological Demand Avoidance+4 | Kendall | — | — | radical acceptancePDA+5 | — | 54m 31s | ||
| 3/24/26 | twinsPathological Demand Avoidance+3 | Pam | — | — | twinsPDA+5 | — | 1h 01m 31s | ||
| 3/17/26 | EntrepreneurshipPathological Demand Avoidance+3 | Christopher Deutsch | — | — | PDAentrepreneurialism+4 | — | 1h 11m 35s | ||
| 3/10/26 | substance abuseparenting+3 | mom | GED | — | substance abusePathological Demand Avoidance+3 | — | 45m 29s | ||
| 3/6/26 | hygienePathological Demand Avoidance+4 | — | Pathological Demand AvoidancePervasive Drive for Autonomy | — | hygienePDA+6 | — | 1h 01m 19s | ||
Showing 33 of 178
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Similar Audience Demographics
Podcasts that attract a similar listener profile
Chart history for At Peace Parents Podcast
Peaked at #22 in PL, currently #22 in PL.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | — | #22 | #22 | — |
| Canada | — | #24 | #24 | — |
| New Zealand | — | #24 | #24 | — |
| Norway | — | #30 | #30 | — |
| Ireland | — | #35 | #35 | — |
| Sweden | — | #35 | #35 | — |
| HU | — | #39 | #39 | — |
| Denmark | — | #44 | #44 | — |
| South Africa | — | #46 | #46 | — |
| United States | — | #54 | #54 | — |
| Australia | — | #56 | #56 | — |
| United Kingdom | — | #57 | #57 | — |
| Germany | — | #81 | #81 | — |
| Norway | — | #87 | #87 | — |
| Ireland | — | #90 | #90 | — |
| Canada | — | #93 | #93 | — |
| New Zealand | — | #95 | #95 | — |
| TR | — | #99 | #99 | — |
| PL | — | #102 | #102 | — |
| GR | — | #109 | #109 | — |
Chart Positions
33 placements across 22 markets.
Chart Positions
33 placements across 22 markets.