Quite right!: Starmer didn’t even want Mandelson – so why appoint him?

About this episode

The episode discusses the implications of Keir Starmer's decision to appoint Mandelson amidst concerns about his judgment and authority.

For more from Michael and Maddie, search 'Quite right!' wherever you are listening to this podcast and hit the follow button to never miss an episode. This week: the Mandelson row deepens – and a bigger question about Keir Starmer’s judgment and authority. After a bruising appearance from Olly Robbins at the Foreign Affairs Committee, Michael and Madeline ask whether the Prime Minister’s defence still holds and assess the weaknesses this whole debacle has exposed in Keir Starmer. For example, why did he want Mandelson to be US Ambassador in the first place, given the numerous red flags and the fact that – as Michael suggests – he doesn’t particularly like Mandelson or his style of operating? They also discuss whether this will end up being a resigning issue – and, if Starmer does go, what comes next? With potential successors circling and the local elections looming, would removing him would solve the problem or make it worse? Produced by Oscar Edmondson. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Topics covered

• Keir Starmer
• Mandelson
• politics
• judgment
• authority

Keywords

• political analysis
• UK politics
• local elections

Mentioned in this episode

Books & works: Quite right

Places: US

More episodes of Best of the Spectator

• LIVE: Conservatives vs Reform debate · May 4, 2026 · 28 min
• Spectator Out Loud: Martin Vander Weyer, Freddy Gray & Arabella Byrne · May 3, 2026 · 20 min
• Reality check: why Polanski is wrong about drug legalisation · May 2, 2026 · 17 min
• Americano: how the Declaration of Independence made America · May 1, 2026 · 51 min
• The Edition: Britain’s fraying social contract – and what comes after Starmer? · April 30, 2026 · 43 min
• The Book Club: How to Kill a Language · April 29, 2026 · 41 min