Can Torture Be Justified? | Stephen Kershnar

About this episode

Stephen Kershnar discusses the ethics of torture and the conditions under which it may be justified.

We welcome back Stephen Kershnar to discuss the ethics of torture. Kershnar argues that some criminals deserve torture because severe wrongdoing can cause a person to forfeit protections against extreme punishment. He critiques the idea that there are moral constraints the state must never cross. The dialogue also examines objections to torture concerning human dignity, bodily integrity, and the dangers of granting the state such power. Chapters [00:00] Introduction [00:43] Why Punitive Torture? [04:57] Defining Torture [08:22] Solitary Confinement Today [10:15] Deterrence versus Retribution [19:19] Can Rights Be Forfeited? [29:54] Contracts You Cannot Exit [34:30] Consent, Punishment, and Efficiency [37:28] Demographics and Equality [45:48] Punitive Rape Debate [48:05] Side Constraints on Torture [53:40] Third Party Harms [58:06] Closing Remarks Subscribe on Substack: https://braininavat.substack.com/

People in this episode

Host: Brain in a Vat

Guest: Stephen Kershnar

Topics covered

• ethics of torture
• punishment
• human dignity
• state power
• criminal justice

Keywords

• torture
• ethics
• punitive punishment
• human rights
• state authority

More episodes of Brain in a Vat

• A World Without Scarcity | Steven Kotler · May 6, 2026 · 60 min
• Living with Adversity | David Benatar · May 6, 2026 · 55 min
• Risky Storytelling | Kevin Allison · May 6, 2026 · 1h 4m
• Free Speech, Hate Speech, and Mental Health | Chloe Carmichael · March 22, 2026 · 1h 2m
• The Bias against Conservatism in Higher Education | Amy Wax · March 9, 2026 · 1h 9m
• The Nature of the Sexes | Tomás Bogardus (with Stephen Kershnar) · February 22, 2026 · 1h 5m