AI vs. JD

AI vs. JD

From Civil Banter by Hamish Mills-McEwan, Stanford Cummings

January 7, 2026 · 25 min · Season 1 · Episode 11

About this episode

In this episode, the hosts discuss the influence of AI in legal practice and its implications.

In Episode 11 of Civil Banter, Stan and Hamish dive into the growing influence of AI in legal practice. They discuss recent cases where lawyers relied on AI-generated factums containing fake citations, the ethical implications, and new court rules requiring lawyers to certify their sources. While AI can help with drafting, it’s far from reliable for research and demands careful oversight. Our hosts also tackle two frequently asked questions: - Is what you tell your lawyer confidential? - Is there a maximum amount you can sue for?

People in this episode

Hosts: Stan, Hamish

Topics covered

  • AI in legal practice
  • ethical implications of AI
  • lawyer confidentiality
  • lawsuit limits

Keywords

  • AI-generated factums
  • fake citations
  • court rules
  • lawyer-client confidentiality

Mentioned in this episode

Products: AI tools for legal drafting

Books & works: Civil Banter

More episodes of Civil Banter

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Civil Banter podcast page.