
AI vs. JD
From Civil Banter by Hamish Mills-McEwan, Stanford Cummings
January 7, 2026 · 25 min · Season 1 · Episode 11
About this episode
In this episode, the hosts discuss the influence of AI in legal practice and its implications.
In Episode 11 of Civil Banter, Stan and Hamish dive into the growing influence of AI in legal practice. They discuss recent cases where lawyers relied on AI-generated factums containing fake citations, the ethical implications, and new court rules requiring lawyers to certify their sources. While AI can help with drafting, it’s far from reliable for research and demands careful oversight. Our hosts also tackle two frequently asked questions: - Is what you tell your lawyer confidential? - Is there a maximum amount you can sue for?
People in this episode
Hosts: Stan, Hamish
Topics covered
- AI in legal practice
- ethical implications of AI
- lawyer confidentiality
- lawsuit limits
Keywords
- AI-generated factums
- fake citations
- court rules
- lawyer-client confidentiality
Mentioned in this episode
Products: AI tools for legal drafting
Books & works: Civil Banter
More episodes of Civil Banter
- Catastrophic Impairment: The High-Stakes Determination · April 17, 2026 · 21 min
- Grounds for a Lawsuit: All About Slips and Falls · March 18, 2026 · 24 min
- Before You Sign That Waiver · February 4, 2026 · 29 min
- I Spy With My Legal Eye.. · September 4, 2025 · 36 min
- Pour Choices: When a Party Turns into a Lawsuit · August 6, 2025 · 20 min
- The Dog Days of Summer · July 16, 2025 · 32 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Civil Banter podcast page.