CM Murray LLP - Employment, Partnership and Regulatory Law

Building on the Glass Cliff discussion between Sophie Williams and Emma Sangeelee at last week’s 7th Annual IFSEA Conference Welcome Drinks Reception - and the Glass Cliff evening event earlier this year, kindly hosted by Mishcon de Reya - this podcast explores the concept in more depth. Drawing on research, lived experience and practical insight, the discussion unpacks how and why underrepresented leaders can find themselves stepping into the most challenging leadership roles - and what can be done to change that trajectory. Once again, Emma Sangeelee (Partner, CM Murray LLP) is joined by Sophie Williams (Author of The Glass Cliff and former global executive at Netflix), Jennifer Millins (Partner, Mishcon de Reya LLP) and Kevin Hogarth (Partner, PSFI LLP and Board Adviser, Executive Coach and NED) to discuss: - What the glass cliff is - and how societal and often unconscious discrimination shapes leadership outcomes - Why underrepresented leaders are more likely to be appointed into roles during periods of organisational crisis - The structural and cultural dynamics behind these appointments, including unequal access to progression, sponsorship and high-profile opportunities - How unconscious bias shapes decision-making - from “think manager, think male” to “think crisis, think female” - The risks for individuals, including scrutiny, limited support and the potential for disproportionate blame when things go wrong - Practical signs to look out for when considering a senior role - and how to assess whether the conditions for success are really in place - The role of sponsorship, organisational support and active leadership in improving outcomes - How the concept can be used in a legal context to identify and evidence patterns of unfair treatment Watch the video below or listen here. The podcast offers a thought-provoking look at a dynamic that continues to play out across organisations and, importantly, where advisers and leaders can intervene to drive better, fairer outcomes. Special thanks to Melissa Davis (CEO, MD Communications) who was unable to join the podcast, but took part in the Glass Cliff IFSEA evening event earlier this year. If you would like to discuss the Glass Cliff further, or if you have any questions arising from this discussion, please contact Emma Sangeelee, Sophie Williams, Jennifer Millins or Kevin Hogarth. Sophie Williams's book, The Glass Cliff, is available for purchase on Amazon and in other bookshops.

We are delighted to share with you the recording of our recent webinar, Professional Services in the Age of AI: Regulation, Strategy, and Real-World Impact. In this discussion, Anthony Davis (FisherBroyles), Devika Kewalramani, (FisherBroyles), Dr Robert Millard (Cambridge Strategy Group), David Shufflebotham (PepUp Consulting) and Nick Leale (CM Murray LLP) join chair Corinne Staves (CM Murray LLP) to explore the impact of technology on professional services firms, with a particular focus on regulation. Topics covered include: - How is technology reshaping professional services firms? From AI-powered research and disclosure tools to virtual client engagement, technology is now embedded in every aspect of firm strategy and operations. - What are the implications for structure, pricing, and regulation? AI is driving a shift away from traditional leverage models, elevating the role of technologists and challenging the billable hour. Value-based pricing is gaining ground and firms must rethink how they assess and compensate their partners. - What regulatory and ethical risks must firms manage? Competence, confidentiality, and supervision remain central. Firms must develop clear AI policies, invest in training and maintain strong oversight - particularly as regulatory scrutiny increases. - What practical steps should firms take now? Define your AI business case, benchmark tools, train your teams, and document compliance. The next generation of lawyers is already embracing AI - leaders must act now to stay ahead. This summary was drafted using Microsoft Copilot, as part of our ongoing exploration of how AI can support and enhance professional services. If you would like to discuss any aspect of AI in relation to your firm, or if you have any specific questions arising from this discussion, please contact Partner and non-contentious partnership specialist Corinne Staves, or Partner and leading regulatory law specialist Nick Leale. For example, CM Murray LLP can assist firms with reviewing their HR, risk management and other policies and/or their terms of business, on changes to governance and compensation systems for partners as a result of the increased adoption of technology and the regulatory implications of the use AI and technology in client service.

Following the 6th IFSEA International Conference on Executive & Founder Issues in June 2025, we are delighted to share with you a follow up podcast on the session, ‘Breaking the Silence: “Everyone knew but no one did anything” – Tackling Workplace Harassment and Bullying, and Ineffective Regulation’. Watch the video, listen to the recording or read the transcript. In this excellent discussion, the IFSEA annual conference panellists examine employer obligations regarding workplace harassment and bullying, as well as the key issues around addressing – and failing to address – misconduct. - Chair: Beth Hale,CM Murray LLP (UK) - Andrew Pavlovic, CM Murray LLP (UK) - Nick Vamos, Peters & Peters (UK) - Mathilde Houet-Weil, Weil et Associes (France) - Lori L. Deem, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd (Chicago, USA) In particular, the panel discuss: - What responsibilities are placed on the employer in the UK, France and the US? - When does inaction bear regulatory and/or criminal consequences? - The ethical and legal implications of using NDAs to conceal repeated wrongdoing. - Current practices aimed at preventing the hiring of the rolling bad apple. - How can senior leaders, regulators and governments do better?

In this fifth video in our series focusing on Private Equity investment in professional services firms, Partner Zulon Begum is joined by special guest Claire Watkins, Partner and Head of the Professional Practices Group at Buzzacott LLP, to discuss the key financial and operational considerations that firms should be thinking about when contemplating PE investment for their firm. As part of this series, we will be recording a special episode dedicated to answering FAQs about PE investment. If you have any specific questions you would like us to cover, please email them to us via zulon.begum@cm-murray.com. In this video, Zulon and Claire discuss: - Which sectors are attracting the most PE interest currently? While accountancy practices are leading, law firms are showing early-stage activity, in particular, smaller firms and boutique practices - What makes accountancy firms so appealing to PE investors? Recurring revenue and regulation-driven services, plus scalable models and predictable income streams are key draws - What opportunities exist for law firms? Scaling up individual firms, funding expansion into new markets and enabling exit strategies for founding partners - How can PE investment support tech and efficiency gains: Enabling scale-up of technology and AI, as well as streamlining volume transactional services - What are the challenges in attracting PE? Law firms may be less prepared for PE investment; financial management and growth planning metrics may need improvement; cultural resistance to reduced autonomy and sometimes less mature governance and performance management in comparison to accountancy firms - What cultural and operational shifts come with PE investment? The move from consensus-based decision-making to performance-driven practices with set KPIs and targets, plus increased pressure on partner autonomy. Positive impacts include better pricing, development of talent and adoption of technology If you would like to discuss any aspect of private equity investment in relation to your firm, or if you have any questions arising from this recording, please contact Partner Zulon Begum.

In this Ten-Minute Talk, Senior Partner Sarah Chilton and Senior Associate Wonu Sanda discuss mandatory retirement ages (MRAs) in partnerships and takeaways from the Scott v Walker Morris LLP case that has reignited interest in this topic. If you are a partner facing a mandatory retirement policy or a firm leader wanting a quick overview of this area, this is a must listen. Key discussion points from this Ten-Minute Talk include: - What are the MRA trends we are seeing in firms? - Can firms really force partners to retire and can a partner challenge an MRA? - How to determine if an MRA crosses the line into discrimination - What evidence is needed to justify an MRA and lessons from the Walker Morris LLP case. - Are there better alternatives to MRAs and do they carry the same discrimination risks? - Practical strategies for partners and partnerships navigating this complex issue. If you would like to discuss any aspect of mandatory retirement, or if you have any questions arising from this recording, please contact Senior Partner Sarah Chilton, Senior Associate Wonu Sanda or Managing Partner Clare Murray.

In the next episode of our regulatory podcast ReguLaw, Partner and Regulatory specialist, Andrew Pavlovic, and Associate, Liz Pearson are joined by Adam Sher of Fountain Court Chambers. Adam has a broad commercial practice, but has a particular interest in all aspects of legal professional privilege. Adam has been involved in a number of important decisions in this area and frequently speaks and writes on the topic. In this episode Andrew, Liz and Adam discuss: - The concept of legal privilege and how it arises in SRA investigations, including by reference to the SDT case of Joel Woolf. - The SRA’s contention that it can compel the production of privileged correspondence between a solicitor under investigation and his/her client. - The bases for the SRA’s contentions and whether they stand up to scrutiny, including by reference to the case of the Financial Reporting Council v Sports Direct International plc. - How firms/individuals are currently dealing with this issue in practice. - A call to arms for a test case so the SRA’s position can be subject to further scrutiny. We hope you enjoyed this episode of ReguLaw. If you have any questions or would like to feature as a special guest in a future episode, please get in touch with Partner Andrew Pavlovic.

In the next episode of our regulatory podcast ReguLaw, Partner and Regulatory specialist, Andrew Pavlovic, and Associate, Liz Pearson are joined by Michael Evans of Byfield. Byfield are market leaders in providing reputation counsel to law firms and individuals facing regulatory investigations and proceedings and Michael has significant experience in this area. Andrew, Liz and Michael discuss how firms and individuals can attempt to manage the consequences of an SRA investigation and potential SDT prosecution at various stages of the process, including: - The investigative stage – the potential for publication at this early stage and the preparatory steps that firms and individuals can take; - The referral stage – how to manage concerns about the impact of publicity on mental/physical health and how individuals/firms can handle the unpredictability of the timing of publication on the SRA’s website; - The hearing - the SDT’s new Automatic Disclosure Policy, and the impact this is likely to have on the press coverage of proceedings going forwards. We hope you enjoyed this episode of ReguLaw. If you have any questions or would like to feature as a special guest in a future episode, please get in touch with Partner Andrew Pavlovic.