Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Est. Listeners
Insufficient chart data. Estimates will improve as the show charts.
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
N/A🎙 ~2x weekly·38 episodes·Last published 3mo ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
N/A - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
N/A
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 10 epsHost
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Paula Slaughter and Sandra Hagen – Turning a Contested Stroke Case into a $3.2M Verdict
Mar 20, 2026
54m 25s
Vern Ready – Turning “Corporation vs. Customer” into a $2.7M Verdict
Mar 6, 2026
1h 00m 36s
Gabriel Stoops – When 24 Hours Can’t Wait a Week: A $1.2M Med Mal Verdict
Feb 20, 2026
50m 42s
Ciara Anderson, Omeed Azmoudeh, and Crist Whitney – Part 2: The “Main Brains” Behind $20M Police Shooting Verdict
Jan 30, 2026
56m 34s
Siddhartha Rathod and John Lee - Part 1 of Two-Part Series on $20M Verdict for Police Shooting Victims
Jan 7, 2026
33m 22s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/20/26 | Paula Slaughter and Sandra Hagen – Turning a Contested Stroke Case into a $3.2M Verdict✨ | legal strategytrial teamwork+3 | Paula SlaughterSandra Hagen | The Wilhite Law FirmFuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers | — | stroke casejury verdict+3 | — | 54m 25s | |
| 3/6/26 | Vern Ready – Turning “Corporation vs. Customer” into a $2.7M Verdict✨ | premises liabilitylegal strategy+3 | Vern Ready | TargetFuicelli & Lee | — | premises casenegligence+3 | — | 1h 00m 36s | |
| 2/20/26 | Gabriel Stoops – When 24 Hours Can’t Wait a Week: A $1.2M Med Mal Verdict✨ | medical malpracticelegal victory+3 | Gabriel Stoops | Stoops Law GroupFuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers+1 | — | medical malpracticejury trial+3 | — | 50m 42s | |
| 1/30/26 | Ciara Anderson, Omeed Azmoudeh, and Crist Whitney – Part 2: The “Main Brains” Behind $20M Police Shooting Verdict✨ | civil rightspolice shooting+3 | Ciara AndersonOmeed Azmoudeh+1 | Fuicelli & LeeRathod Mohamedbhai | Denver | police shootingcivil rights case+3 | — | 56m 34s | |
| 1/7/26 | Siddhartha Rathod and John Lee - Part 1 of Two-Part Series on $20M Verdict for Police Shooting Victims✨ | civil rightspolice accountability+3 | Siddhartha RathodJohn Lee | Rathod MohamedbhaiFuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers | Denver | civil rights lawsuitpolice shooting+5 | — | 33m 22s | |
| 9/24/25 | Melissa Hailey and Liz Hart – $7.6M Verdict for a Teen with Debilitating Headaches✨ | personal injurylegal strategy+3 | Melissa HaileyLiz Hart | Hailey | HartFuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers | Colorado | $7.6 million verdictdebilitating headaches+3 | — | 56m 39s | |
| 8/29/25 | Tim Garvey and Greg Bentley – From Broken Sidewalk to $8.2M Verdict✨ | personal injurytrial strategies+3 | Tim GarveyGreg Bentley | Fuicelli & LeeSari de la Motte+4 | — | broken sidewalktraumatic brain injury+3 | — | 1h 01m 05s | |
| 8/1/25 | Tim Galluzzi - Lessons from Three Back-to-Back Trials✨ | jury trialscase management+3 | Tim Galluzzi | FilevineCheney Galluzzi & Howard+1 | — | jury trialslitigation+3 | — | 54m 01s | |
| 7/18/25 | Jared Mazzei and Jessica McBryant - $6.9M Verdict Beats Malingering Claim in Slip-and-Fall Case✨ | slip-and-fallneuropsychology+3 | Jared MazzeiJessica McBryant | Ramos LawFuicelli & Lee+1 | Kohl’s | slip-and-fallmalingering+3 | — | 48m 03s | |
| 7/4/25 | Spencer Kontnik – Securing a $500,000 Verdict for a Denied Job Accommodation✨ | disability rightsemployment law+3 | Spencer Kontnik | Denver HealthFuicelli & Lee | — | disabilityjob accommodation+3 | — | 49m 16s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 6/10/25 | Sean Dormer and Spencer Bryan – Groundbreaking $4M Verdict in Jail Suicide | Text messages and surveillance footage revealed the horrific truth: A jail inmate told staff, "I'm trying to kill myself right now," yet they did nothing. Eight hours later, he was found dead. Sean Dormer returns for his third podcast appearance alongside civil rights attorney Spencer Bryan to discuss their groundbreaking $4 million verdict on behalf of the inmate’s family. Host Keith Fuicelli explores how they overcame the deliberately indifferent standard, defeated qualified immunity at the 10th Circuit, and secured what appears to be Colorado's largest jail suicide verdict. Their victory came despite defense counsel telling jurors that the inmate "valued his life at nothing because he killed himself."Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Spencer Bryan | LinkedIn☑️ Bryan & Terrill Law on Facebook | YouTube☑️ Sean Dormer | LinkedIn☑️ Dormer Harpring Personal Injury Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotAn inmate named Jackson told jail staff "I'm trying to kill myself right now" while banging his head against the cell wallThe jail captain repeated Jackson's words, acknowledging he heard the suicidal statement, yet no suicide watch was implemented.One jailer was criminally charged for falsifying cell check logs, claiming he checked on Jackson when he never did.Jackson's body wasn't discovered for eight hours despite industry standards requiring hourly checks for non-suicidal inmates.The trial team overcame qualified immunity challenges and prevailed at the 10th Circuit Court of AppealsColorado Open Records Act requests revealed inconsistent police reports and preserved crucial surveillance footageDefense strategy backfired when counsel told jurors that Jackson "valued his life at nothing because he killed himself."The $4 million verdict appears to be Colorado's largest jail suicide award and among the top 10 nationally.In an emotional courtroom moment, Jackson’s mother forgave the young deputy who falsified logs.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 5/23/25 | Kylie Schmidt and Nicole Quintana – Landing $400,000 for Flight Paramedic's Ear Injury | Two routine medical flights turned catastrophic when the cabin rapidly depressurized, leaving a flight paramedic with permanent tinnitus and hearing loss. In this case break-down with host Keith Fuicelli, Nicole Quintana and Kylie Schmidt of Ogborn Mihm discuss how they navigated complex aviation maintenance records, fought an admission of liability that wasn't truly an admission, and overcame defense arguments about their client's recreational shooting and explosives training to secure verdicts totalling nearly $400,000 for both incidents.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Kylie Schmidt | LinkedIn☑️ Nicole Quintana | LinkedIn☑️ Ogborn Mihm on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotThe case involved a flight paramedic who suffered permanent tinnitus (ringing in the ears) and hearing loss after cabin depressurization incidents in an air ambulance.The trial team identified maintenance failures that caused the rapid loss of cabin pressure that damaged their client's ears.Focus groups encouraged the team to disclose their client's recreational activities – shooting and explosives training – upfront rather than let the defense use them as a "gotcha" moment.The client's annual hearing tests for his job proved invaluable in showing that he had no tinnitus symptoms before the first incident.Despite a workers' compensation doctor giving a 0% impairment rating, the attorneys successfully argued that their client suffered permanent physical impairment.The defense claimed negligence but refused to admit specific failures, forcing extensive motions practice about what evidence could be presented at trial.The second, similar depressurization incident occurred during litigation, which caused the client to abandon his flight paramedic career.The jury awarded $378,000 for the first incident and $17,000 for the second.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 5/9/25 | Allison Pritchard and Phil Meinkoth – Surveillance, Strategy, and a $240K Slip-and-Fall Verdict | When a 68-year-old woman shattered her kneecap after slipping in Walmart, defense attorneys expected an easy win—ignoring that surveillance footage revealed employees had walked past the water spill without action for 30 minutes. Allison Pritchard and Phil Meinkoth of Olson Personal Injury Lawyers reveal to host Keith Fuicelli how they meticulously built their case, leveraging surveillance footage, strategic witness cross-examinations, and a perfectly calculated damage ask that delivered a $240,000 verdict—exceeding their pre-trial demand by nearly $70,000.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Allison Pritchard | LinkedIn☑️ Phil Meinkoth | LinkedIn☑️ Olson Personal Injury Lawyers on LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotThe client slipped in a pool of water that had been present for 30 minutes after ice delivery, breaking her kneecap so severely that she permanently lost the lower half of her patella.Surveillance footage revealed four Walmart employees walking directly through the area without addressing the hazard.The team fought to obtain complete surveillance footage, initially receiving only 5 minutes before securing the full 2 hours that showed the origin of the spill.Walmart claimed everyone is responsible for safety but had no enforcement mechanisms, safety sweep logs, or accountability systems.The defense's attempt to designate the ice delivery company as a non-party at fault was struck due to the nondelegation doctrine for premises liability.The attorneys made a strategic game-time decision to ask for half of their initially calculated damages, increasing their credibility with the jury.The jury awarded exactly what was asked for ($240,000 with 25% comparative fault), which exceeded Walmart's final offer of $150,000.Effective witness cross-examination turned a likable female Walmart manager into a "victim of the corporation" by highlighting how she lacked tools to enforce safety protocols.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 4/21/25 | Courtney Samuel – Train Like Your Practice Depends On It | Lawyers have a stressful job and, as host Keith Fuicelli explains, “keeping our bodies in peak optimal performance is critical to success.” That’s why he invites his personal trainer, Courtney Samuel, to the show to encourage lawyers to take up a physical fitness regimen. Courtney lays out why maintaining muscle mass becomes increasingly crucial as we age and offers practical fitness guidance for busy professionals. Tune in for Courtney’s insights about the importance of treating your body as professionally as your legal practice.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Courtney Samuel | LinkedIn☑️ Bodies By Perseverance on LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | X☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotCourtney's path from NFL prospect with a computer science degree to fitness entrepreneur.Why beginners should look to personal trainers as they embark on their fitness journey. How maintaining muscle mass becomes increasingly crucial as we age, particularly to prevent conditions like osteoporosisWhy boxing is an excellent low-impact, high-intensity cardio option.Courtney recommends starting with two weekly strength training sessions (45-60 minutes) that focus on upper and lower body.Simple body-weight exercises anyone can do in limited time: push-ups, sit-ups, dips, squats, and jumping jacks.The mindset necessary to overcome the "inner voice" that wants to skip workouts.Bodies By Perseverance has two Denver locations: the main 10,000-square-foot facility (30th and Downing) and a personal training studio in Cherry Creek North.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 4/4/25 | Alana Anzalone and Melanie Stuckey – Securing $2.2M for a Client with Herniated Discs | A seemingly routine case turned extraordinary when Alana Anzalone and Melanie Stuckey secured a $2.2 million verdict in Adams County for a 22-year-old client with herniated discs. Their victory is even more remarkable considering this was Melanie's first trial after transitioning from paralegal to attorney, and they faced a defendant who shockingly denied even hitting their client's car despite totaling it. Host Keith Fuicelli explores how their teamwork, strategic witness preparation, and powerful rebuttal of the defense's degenerative disc claims led to a jury award exceeding their request.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Alana Anzalone | LinkedIn ☑️ Anzalone & Doyle Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook☑️ Melanie Stuckey | LinkedIn☑️ Donaldson Law on LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotMelanie's inspiring journey from 25-year paralegal career to law school graduate and trial lawyer in 2020.The case involved a 22-year-old client with multiple herniated discs after being rear-ended on I-25 by a 78-year-old distracted driver.State Farm initially offered only $28,000 on $66,000 in medical bills, then later made a $95,000 statutory offer that the client rejected.The defendant shocked everyone at trial by denying he even hit the client's car, despite causing so much damage that it was totaled.The defense expert tried to attribute the young client's injuries to degenerative disc disease, claiming all symptoms were pre-existing.The chiropractor played a critical role by establishing the plaintiff’s permanent impairment through his testimony about ligament laxity.The case benefitted from the co-counsels’ complementary styles: Melanie's calm demeanor and Alana's fiery approach.The jury awarded $2,232,500, exceeding what was requested, including $40 per day for physical impairment based on the client's barber fee.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado.\ | — | ||||||
| 2/7/25 | Melanie Sulkin – Turning a Low-Impact Crash into a $583K Verdict | At a glance, the two large vehicles involved in a rear-end collision – a Toyota 4Runner and a Nissan Xterra – didn’t appear visibly damaged. And Melanie Sulkin’s client didn’t appear injured. But Melanie pursued the case beyond surface images. She recounts her methods with host Keith Fuicelli. From proving the significant frame damage to her client’s car and the permanent injury to her client’s rotator cuff, Melanie describes an approach that yielded a jury verdict of nearly $583,000.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Melanie Sulkin | LinkedIn☑️ Krivit Law | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotMelanie found her calling as an undergraduate when she founded Northern Illinois University’s mock trial team.Early in her career, Melanie was on the team that tried the first M2a Magnum Biomet case in the country.In a recent case, Melanie represented a client who was rear-ended, but both her client’s car and the defendant’s car showed little to no visible property damage.Even though the defendant originally admitted fault, his stories changed during trial in an attempt to place some blame on Melanie’s client.In arguing that the crash caused her client’s rotator cuff tear, Melanie showed photos of the car, and her client testified that she had the entire frame repaired. Melanie struck many jurors who said during voir dire that her client “looks fine.” When the “mechanism of injury” became a question at trial, Melanie elicited an answer from the defense surgeon.The defendant’s insurance carrier initially agreed to a demand of $300,000, but then backed off. For Melanie’s client, the decision to go to trial was easy. “They told us to make a demand, we did it, and they didn't make good on it,” Melanie says.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 1/31/25 | Clay Wire and Jason Wesoky – The Contract Dispute with a “Mean Girls” Plot | Text messages, complete with poop emojis, revealed that a charter school’s board members targeted the executive director because they just didn’t like her. “It was like ‘Mean Girls,’” recalls Jason Wesoky, who, with colleague Clay Wire, represented the director.Tune into this case breakdown with host Keith Fuicelli as Jason and Clay describe how they framed the contract dispute as a set-up by board members hoping to boot their client off the job. In the end, she won a jury verdict of about $950,000.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Clay Wire | LinkedIn☑️ Jason Wesoky | LinkedIn☑️ Ogborn Mihm on LinkedIn | Facebook☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotWhen he realized that he was making more as a bartender than he would as a political scientist or journalist, Clay turned to law school.Jason grew up in the legal world and went to college knowing he wanted to be a lawyer.Clay and Jason represented the executive director of a Colorado charter school when a new board refused to honor her contract.Because the team couldn’t bring tort claims against a governmental entity, they focused on a contract claim for economic damages through the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act.Their client used the state’s social security replacement for public employees to draw on her retirement and then return to work under the contract. The defense argued that their client had, in fact, retired and that she wasn’t honoring her contract.Text messages provided through the Colorado Open Records Act revealed the real story: that board leaders targeted their client because they didn’t like her.Clay and Jason were also helped by a former board member who had written a long email to the rest of the board, detailing problems he saw with how they treated their client. At trial, the board president testified that she had only “skimmed” the email.At closing, the team focused on showing how the board’s bad decisions were due to bad advice from their lawyer. Clay’s final line of questioning to the board attorney elicited the attorney’s personal interest in a good outcome – for him. The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 11/26/24 | Dan Lipman - $2M Verdict Redefines Physical Impairment in Sexual Assault Cases | The jury in Dan Lipman’s civil case on behalf of a young sexual assault survivor awarded $2,020,000 in three categories of damages: economic, non-economic, and physical impairment. The last category was notable because few, if any, Colorado juries have awarded damages for physical impairment based on emotional trauma.Now, one has.“We can’t find another verdict where, in a civil case, a sexual assault victim proved physical impairment not from physical injury, like being beaten, but from the emotional aspect of it. And we think that this is a notable case that will help open the door to other survivors of sexual assault,” he explains to host Keith Fuicelli.Tune in to hear Dan break down this strategy and other approaches in the Jefferson County case. For lawyers, Dan provides questions they should answer in screening sexual assault cases and, once they’re working with a client, tips for prioritizing empathy.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Dan Lipman | LinkedIn☑️ Parker Lipman | LinkedIn☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotDan’s focus on sexual assault cases began with the case of a male swimming coach who was having sexual contact with a 16-year-old swimmer.The two questions Dan answers when he screens these types of cases.The complicated landscape of the statute of limitations for sex assault claims.Background of the Jefferson County case where Dan represented a girl who was sexually assaulted by her mother’s fiance.In asking for damages, Dan categorized his client’s emotional trauma as physical impairment, a technique that yielded a notable verdict.How Dan “ferociously” fought the defense argument that his client’s PTSD diagnosis was created by lawyers.If PTSD physically impairs the brain, why not get an MRI? “You want to be really careful to say that imaging can show these impacts. Imaging can show these impacts in some people, and it’s not known which people show these things or not,” Dan explains.Dan’s pointers for lawyers taking on sexual assault cases: First, make sure the client wants to go to trial.The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 11/12/24 | Ross Ziev – $350,000 in Slip-and-Fall that Unfolded Like a Murder Mystery | Jurors listened, wide-eyed, as Ross Ziev presented his case against King Sooper Grocery Store. His client was injured in a slip-and-fall, but they may as well have been watching a murder mystery as a poor-quality video revealed “who-dun-it.”“You could see in the jury’s eyes – they were trying to figure out what caused this as well,” Ross recalls in this case break-down with host Keith Fuicelli. They ultimately awarded $350,000 to his client for pain and suffering and physical impairment.The store’s video proved to be pivotal evidence, and Ross details his strategy for when and how he presented it. He also walks through important steps that PI plaintiffs’ lawyers should take in such cases, starting with claims notes, incident reports, and video. And he offers advice for how to compel an obstructionist defense to disclose vital information. As for who caused his client’s fall… tune in to find out!Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Ross Ziev I LinkedIn☑️ Legal Help in Colorado I LinkedIn I Instagram I Facebook☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotRoss’ path from his native Dallas to law school at the University of Denver to launching his own firm in 2019.Background of Ross’ case on behalf of a woman who slipped and fell in the aisle of a King Soopers Grocery Store.Ross filed a formal settlement demand, but his experience has taught him that adjusters try to low-ball the plaintiff’s lawyer.Ross’ questioning of the assistant manager revealed that the store cleaned up the spill before any photos of it were taken.The defense went to trial assuming that a random customer caused the spill. Ross’ team reviewed store video that showed the real source.Ross’ theory at voir dire: damages and physical impairment and whether jurors would award those types of damages.How Ross overcame defense objections to some testimony about the store’s failure to investigate the spill.Why Ross advises plaintiffs’ lawyers to review disclosure and discovery with “an eye for deficiencies.” The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 9/6/24 | Jason Jordan – Strategies for Winning, from Product Liability to “Felonious Killing” | Colorado PI attorney Jason Jordan, founder of Jordan Law, has a vast amount of product liability experience, but he recently settled a “felonious killing” case that had reminders of the killing of George Floyd. In that case, Jason represented the widow of a man who was killed when guards at a hospital leaned on his back and neck until he lost consciousness. In this conversation with Keith Fuicelli, Jason recounts the details of that case as well as how his team investigates to determine if a case has product liability issues. He also describes his process for getting to know clients in order to humanize them for a jury and to prepare them for testimony in court. Finally, Jason stresses the importance of partnering with other attorneys both for their experience and for expertise in specialized areas of the law.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Jason Jordan | LinkedIn | Instagram | X | Facebook☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotHow Jason opened his own practice out of law schoolWhy Jason encourages young lawyers to ask for help, seek partners on casesA car accident may include product liability issues, so lawyers should be prepared to investigate car parts involved in the crashHow Jason exposed the training of hospital guards who killed a patient by leaning on his neck.How to get to know your clients well so you can humanize them in courtHow a video tape of a hospital patient showed he wasn’t violent until a guard touched himWhy it matters which state a trial is held in and the importance of investigating state lawsHow focus groups can help trial lawyers decide how to present a caseIf a victim or a client has a dark side, lawyers must offer testimony about their strengthsHow press conferences can be a tool to help stop witness intimidationThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 8/2/24 | Michael Born and Peter McCaffrey – Finding Fault in a High-Speed, No-Seatbelt Case | Two cars collided head-on – but their client wasn’t wearing his seatbelt. The client suffered a brain injury – but didn’t require significant medical treatment.Yet Michael Born and Peter McCaffrey of Born & McCaffrey Injury Law secured $380,000 from a jury. With host Keith Fuicelli, Michael and Peter reveal the plot twists in this unique case, starting at the hospital, when police initially considered that their client was at fault. The story changed when crash data revealed the defendant’s excessive speed. Michael and Peter discuss how they balanced the role that speed played against their client’s lack of a seatbelt. They also share how they delicately cross-examined the defendant so that the jury would not feel sympathy for him.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Peter McCaffrey | LinkedIn☑️ Michael Born | LinkedIn☑️ Born & McCaffrey Injury Law on Facebook | Instagram | YouTube | TikTok☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotAdvice from Peter and Michael to young trial lawyers working for big verdictsThe advantages of practicing with a partner versus going aloneA story with plot twists begins with the client appearing at faultHow the crash data prompted police to reassess their clientWhat the investigator testified to help them win the caseWhy the defense didn’t call their expertThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 7/19/24 | Sean Dormer and Tim Garvey – $2.51 Million Verdict After Multi-Car Crash in Denver | Their client, a drywall installer, was injured in a five-car pile up outside Denver. Sean Dormer and Tim Garvey helped him secure a $2.51 million verdict against the driver who caused the injuries.Tune in as Sean Dormer and Tim Garvey of Dormer Harpring, LLC join host Keith Fuicelli to discuss this recent trial victory in Denver. Sean and Tim recount the facts of the case, how their quick-thinking changed the course of trial, and how they portrayed their client as a victor and not a victim. Sean and Tim also share how they got a shocking admission from defense experts and their philosophies for voir dire, witness sequencing, and closing arguments.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Tim Garvey | LinkedIn☑️ Sean Dormer | LinkedIn☑️ Dormer Harpring, LLC on LinkedIn, Facebook, & Instagram☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotFacts of Dormer Harpring’s recent $2.51M verdict in DenverObtaining crucial admissions from defense expert witnesses on cross-examinationHow Tim and Sean capitalized on defense’s undisclosed photosHow to frame your client as a victor, not a victimWhy you need to trust your gut at trialCreative closing argumentsThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 7/5/24 | Jessica Schlatter, Paige Singleton, and Randy Manning–$19M Verdict on a Brain Bleed Case | A developmentally disabled man was injured when the car he was in was rear-ended by a delivery service partner company. He needed justice, and he got it. In this episode of Colorado Trial Lawyer Connection, Jessica Schlatter, Paige Singleton, and Randy Manning of Ramos Law join host Keith Fuicelli to discuss a $19M verdict they recently obtained for their client in Denver District Court. Listen as Jessica, Paige, and Randy discuss how their client was diagnosed with a brain bleed within three hours of being involved in a rear-end collision, how they established medical causation at trial, and how a creative closing argument helped put the defense on the ropes and secure a huge win for their plaintiff. Jessica, Paige, and Randy also go in depth into the medical side of their client’s injuries.Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Jessica Schlatter | LinkedIn☑️ Paige Singleton | LinkedIn☑️ Randy Manning☑️ Ramos Law on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, & YouTube☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotFacts of the $19M verdict caseInjuries sustained by the plaintiffArguments made by the defenseUse of experts for liability and damagesGathering information through 20 depositionsUse of focus groups in crafting liability argumentsBreakdown of the $19M verdictUsing police officer testimony to bring in evidence otherwise not admittedThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 6/21/24 |  Tim Galluzzi Interviews Kurt Zaner – ‘Nice Guy’ Wins $30M Verdict in Colorado Federal Court, Part 2 | Trial is adversarial. “Do what you want until you’re not allowed to do it.”In part two of this special episode of Colorado Trial Lawyer Connection, host Keith Fuicelli is joined by guest host Tim Galluzzi, founding partner of Cheney Galluzzi & Howard, LLC to interview Kurt Zaner, founding partner of Zaner Harden Law LLP and owner of the largest premises liability verdict in Colorado history. Kurt, Tim, and Keith discuss the trial on Kurt’s fracking explosion case in federal court in Colorado that resulted in a $30M verdict. Tune in as the trio discuss Kurt’s approach to doing voir dire in 30 minutes or less, the ‘Do Your Job’ theme Kurt used in his opening statement, his ‘butcher paper’ approach to creating persuasive courtroom visuals when you can’t create the perfect slide ahead of time, and more. Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Kurt Zaner | LinkedIn☑️ Zaner Harden Law LLP on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, & YouTube☑️ Tim Galluzzi | LinkedIn☑️ Cheney Galluzzi & Howard, LLC on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok & Twitter/X☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotKurt’s use of visuals at trialTrial prep two weeks leading up to trialKurt’s voir dire strategyResource mentioned: Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering EverythingOpening statementResource mentioned: Twelve Heroes, Once Voice: Guiding Jurors to Courageous VerdictsHow Kurt creates persuasive visuals on the flyHow Kurt sequences evidenceClosing argumentTo see demonstratives Kurt used for opening and closing email KurtThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
| 6/14/24 |  Tim Galluzzi Interviews Kurt Zaner – ‘Nice Guy’ Wins $30M Verdict in Colorado Federal Court, Part 1 | “I do everything I can to be friends with defense lawyers. It makes the case so much more enjoyable. And when it comes to non-parties, just be nice to these people and you’ll be amazed at what you can catch.”In this special episode of Colorado Trial Lawyer Connection, host Keith Fuicelli is joined by guest host Tim Galluzzi, founding partner of Cheney Galluzzi & Howard, LLC to interview Kurt Zaner, founding partner of Zaner Harden Law LLP and owner of the largest premises liability verdict in Colorado history. Kurt, Tim, and Keith discuss Kurt’s fracking explosion case in federal court in Colorado that resulted in a $30M verdict. Tune in as Kurt, Tim, and Keith discuss Kurt’s closing method to make your client’s pain real to the jury, why he filed the case in federal court, experts used in the case, and how being nice to everyone paid dividends at trial. Stay tuned for Part 2 coming out next week! Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers☑️ Kurt Zaner | LinkedIn☑️ Zaner Harden Law LLP on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, & YouTube☑️ Tim Galluzzi | LinkedIn☑️ Cheney Galluzzi & Howard, LLC on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok & Twitter/X☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers Website☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube & LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotGetting to know Kurt ZanerWhy you want the jury to see you as a person, not as a lawyerHow Kurt makes his client’s pain real to the jury at closingCaps in ColoradoBackground of the caseFinding the right expertsHow Kurt simplified things for the juryConflict that arose in the case which led to co-counseling with TimWhy you need to make time for later deposHow being kind benefitted the caseThe information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado. | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 38
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.