
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Est. Listeners
Insufficient chart data. Estimates will improve as the show charts.
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
N/A🎙 ~2x weekly·23 episodes·Last published 3mo ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
N/A - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
N/A
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 10 epsHosts
Not detected.
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Expert Evidence 2026 – Lessons Learned the Hard Way
Mar 26, 2026
1h 02m 17s
Expert Evidence 2026 - Another Year of What Not To Do
Mar 25, 2026
1h 10m 22s
Persuading a SOPA Adjudicator – What Works and What Doesn’t?
Mar 24, 2026
59m 42s
Persuading a SOPA Adjudicator - What Works and What Doesn’t? [2026]
Mar 23, 2026
1h 00m 14s
Pure Economic Loss – From Caltex to Mallonland and beyond
Mar 18, 2026
1h 06m 09s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/26/26 | ![]() Expert Evidence 2026 – Lessons Learned the Hard Way✨ | expert evidencelessons learned | — | — | — | — | — | 1h 02m 17s | |
| 3/25/26 | ![]() Expert Evidence 2026 - Another Year of What Not To Do | Join Anthony Thomas and Julie Wright for their annual round up of lessons learned the hard way. | 1h 10m 22s | ||||||
| 3/24/26 | ![]() Persuading a SOPA Adjudicator – What Works and What Doesn’t?✨ | SOPAadjudication+2 | Robert Sundercombe | — | Australia | adjudicatorinsights+2 | — | 59m 42s | |
| 3/23/26 | ![]() Persuading a SOPA Adjudicator - What Works and What Doesn’t? [2026] | Robert Sundercombe is a highly experienced adjudicator who has decided claims under the security of payment legislation across Australia since 2003. He will share his insights into what he finds persuasive in adjudication applications and responses and what to avoid. Opportunities to hear first-hand from adjudicators are rare – this is not to be missed. | 1h 00m 14s | ||||||
| 3/18/26 | ![]() Pure Economic Loss – From Caltex to Mallonland and beyond✨ | Pure Economic LossCaltex Oil case+2 | Richard Cheney SCIan Roberts SC | Caltexthe High Court’s+5 | Mallonland | High Courtlegal analysis+1 | — | 1h 06m 09s | |
| 3/17/26 | ![]() Pure Economic Loss – From Caltex to Mallonland and beyond [2026] | 2026 will mark the 50th anniversary of the High Court’s decision in Caltex Oil (Aust) Ltd Ltd v Dredge Willemstad (1976) 136 CLR 529. Since that time the Court has been searching for a unifying criteria to determine when a duty of care will be owed to avoid pure economic loss. In this session, Richard Cheney SC and Ian Roberts SC examine the path from Caltex Oil to the High Court’s decision in Mallonland Pty Ltd v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 25 to understand how far we have come, and where we are heading. | 1h 06m 41s | ||||||
| 3/17/26 | ![]() Greenway Hypotheticals (Construction) [2026] | With so many CPDs earnest, but singular, join us for a different style of CPD – a dynamic panel discussion between Declan Byrne, Ashley Cameron, and Faheem Anwar, hosted by Frank Hicks SC, adopting the classic ‘hypotheticals’ style. The panel will consider various issues having regard hypothetical facts, including initial instructions and the prospect of injunctions, on site disputes (Can you film the builder in the course of works?), termination, case preparation and experts (conclaves and the riddle of Schrodinger’s Cat – is you case alive or dead?), attendance at Court, hearing and judgment. | 1h 02m 52s | ||||||
| 3/17/26 | ![]() Greenway Hypotheticals (Construction)✨ | constructionpanel discussion+8 | Declan ByrneAshley Cameron+1 | — | — | CPDlegal education+1 | — | 4m 32s | |
| 3/12/26 | ![]() Developments in Nervous Shock Claims✨ | nervous shock claimshistorical abuse claims+1 | — | — | — | legalclaims+1 | — | 1h 09m 49s | |
| 3/12/26 | ![]() Developments in Nervous Shock Claims [2026] | Tim and Jacinta provide a refresher, review some recent cases and consider the extension of nervous shock claims in the areas of historical abuse claims and childcare centres. | 1h 10m 22s | ||||||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 3/11/26 | ![]() Pondering Restorative Justice and the Coronial Process in NSW✨ | restorative justicecoronial process+1 | — | Pondering Restorative Justice and the Coronial Process | NSW | — | — | 57m 46s | |
| 3/10/26 | ![]() Pondering Restorative Justice and the Coronial Process in NSW [2026] | This talk will look at restorative justice in the coronial setting, with a focus on potential stakeholder engagement including parties with a sufficient interest. | 58m 19s | ||||||
| 3/4/26 | ![]() The Shape of Things to Come: The Changing Class Actions Landscape and the New Privacy Tort✨ | class actionsprivacy tort+2 | Rodrigo Pintos-Lopez | Greenway ChambersHigh Court | — | High Courtclass closure+1 | — | 56m 28s | |
| 3/3/26 | ![]() The Shape of Things to Come: The Changing Class Actions Landscape and the New Privacy Tort [2026] | Hernan Pintos-Lopez (Greenway Chambers) and Rodrigo Pintos-Lopez (List A Barristers) will discuss recent developments in class actions, with a particular focus on: How the class actions landscape is changing; Recent High Court authority in relation to class closure; and Whether the new statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy might lead to new class actions, particularly in relation to cybercrime and mass data breaches. | 57m 00s | ||||||
| 3/3/26 | ![]() Insurance – Recent Developments and Future Predictions✨ | insurance lawrecent developments+2 | — | Thomas | — | insurancelaw+2 | — | 54m 07s | |
| 3/2/26 | ![]() Insurance - Recent Developments and Future Predictions [2026] | Louise and Thomas will discuss some recent developments in the insurance law space. The session will focus on key cases from the last 12 months and what they may signal for the future. | 54m 37s | ||||||
| 2/25/26 | ![]() The Hottest Topics in Industrial Relations for 2026✨ | industrial relationslaw+1 | — | CPD | — | CPD2026+3 | — | 1h 01m 11s | |
| 2/24/26 | ![]() ”Hypothetically Speaking” The Role of Counterfactuals in Claims for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct✨ | counterfactualsmisleading conduct+3 | — | The High CourtGreenway | — | High Courtlegal practitioners+2 | — | 56m 13s | |
| 2/23/26 | ![]() "Hypothetically Speaking…" - The role of Counterfactuals in Claims for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct [2026] | The High Court has said: “The field of debate, causation, is one of the most difficult in the law, and one about which abstract discussion is seldom valuable for courts and those who practise in them.” Many legal practitioners focus so closely on whether a defendant’s conduct was wrong they overlook whether the misconduct was causative of loss. Greenway’s Dinesh Ratnam and Andrew Girgis will get you thinking “so what” by taking you through some of the common mistakes and look at the role of the hypothetical counterfactual in pleading and presenting cases for misleading or deceptive conduct and the extent to which it differs from causation in other contexts. | 56m 45s | ||||||
| 2/16/26 | ![]() The Coroner's Court: A Unique Jurisdiction [2026] | This seminar addresses aspects of the coronial jurisdiction. It outlines various facets of the jurisdiction including the purpose of coronial proceedings, the distinction between manner of death and cause of death, the privilege against self-incrimination, apologies and family statements, and witness preparation. | 55m 43s | ||||||
| 2/14/24 | ![]() WHS Prosecutions for Reckless Conduct and Industrial Manslaughter | Colin Magee and Justin Pen will summarise recent developments regarding the prosecution of “reckless conduct” offences under s 31 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), including by reference to cognate legislation in cognate jurisdictions – namely, whether recklessness requires proof that a defendant foresaw the possibility, rather than a probability, of a risk to health and safety. They will also review the proposed changes to s 31, and the proposed insertion of a new s30A “industrial manslaughter” offence, expressed in the Model Work Health and Safety Legislation Amendment (Offences and Penalties) 2023 (Cth).We hope you can join us. | 1h 02m 56s | ||||||
| 2/9/24 | ![]() Design and Building Practitioners Act Update | Recent decisions interpreting the statutory duty of care imposed by section 37 of the Design and Building Practitioner’s Act 2020 have made it clear that almost any person involved in the construction industry is subject to the new statutory duty of care and may be sued for defective work if they breach that duty. While this appears like a boon for plaintiffs in building and construction actions, there are strict rules that can make pleading and evidencing such a claim a difficult exercise, and care must be taken lest the cost of pleading and prosecuting this cause of action outweigh any potential benefits. Garth Campbell and Lucas Shipway will discuss the recent decisions in this area, the impacts on pleading for both plaintiffs and defendants, and also where the law in this area may be headed. We hope you can join us. | 1h 00m 25s | ||||||
| 3/31/22 | ![]() Contractors vs Employees | In our first segment, Frank Hicks SC and Richard Cheney SC discuss the High Court decision of Stubbings v Jams 2 concerning unconscionable conduct, the Full Federal Court decision in Minister for the Environment v Sharma about the common law duty of care on the Minister in the context of climate change, and Palmer v Premiair Aviation Maintenance a case in which Clive Palmer was ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis. In our second segment, Frank is joined by Ingmar Taylor SC and Lucy Saunders to discuss the recent High Court decisions concerning the question of independent contractor v employee – CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting and ZG Operations v Jamsek. Medium neutral citations of the cases discussed are: Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6 Minister for the Environment v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35 Palmer v Premiair Aviation Maintenance [2022] FCA 185 CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting [2022] HCA 1 ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2 | 41m 35s | ||||||
| 12/21/21 | ![]() Vaccination orders and issues | In this episode of Law Talking, Ian Roberts and Frank Hicks look at recent High Court and NSW Court of Appeal decisions on varied topics such as Clive Palmer, academic freedom, casual workers, vaccination orders, and repudiation and causation in damages claims. Leah Reid joins Frank to discuss vaccination issues in the context of family law and the many questions that can arise involving children and parenting. Lastly, we revisit a seminar that was delivered earlier this year on how to plead a claim for breach of the statutory duty under s.37 of the Design Building Practitioners Act 2020, following the decision in Strata Plan 87060 v Loulach Developments. | 51m 30s | ||||||
| 9/7/21 | ![]() Four cases and Front of House | In this episode, Frank Hicks looks at two recent UK decisions concerning liquidated damages and delay. What is the accrued right to liquidated damages when works are terminated before completion and can a clause which is invalid as a penalty still be operable as a cap? In our second segment, Frank is joined by Richard Cheney and Adele Carr to discuss two important High Court decisions of recent times. Price v Spoor considers the statutory limitations on liability and agreements which may make those provisions unenforceable. Libertyworks Inc v The Commonwealth of Australia concerns the implied right of political communication and the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act 2018 (Cth) ("the FITS Act"), which seeks to ensure greater transparency with respect to potential foreign influence in the effective functioning and accountability of Australian government institutions. Lastly, our Front of House team discusses life in Chambers in these strangest of times! Intro and end music: This Right Here by Till Transition sounds: The Improv and Extraordinaire by DJ Quads Produced by Greenway Chambers | 41m 47s | ||||||
Showing 25 of 23
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
