
Environmental Law Explored: A Podcast SEERies
by ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
Is this your podcast?Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 12 chart positions in 12 markets.
By chart position
- 🇺🇸US · Non-Profit#25100K to 300K
- 🇬🇧GB · Non-Profit#1875K to 30K
- 🇰🇷KR · Non-Profit#6100K to 300K
- 🇫🇷FR · Non-Profit#3930K to 100K
- 🇧🇷BR · Non-Profit#1661K to 10K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
151K to 477K🎙 Weekly cadence·78 episodes·Last published 4d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
303K to 953K🇺🇸31%🇰🇷31%🇫🇷10%+9 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
91K to 286K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 13 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
SEER100: A Century of Environmental Enforcement & Litigation
Aug 31, 2026
Unknown duration
NEPA and Forest Law in the Face of Change
Aug 26, 2026
Unknown duration
SEER100: The Evolution of Federal Water Jurisdiction Under the Clean Water Act
Aug 24, 2026
Unknown duration
SEER100: The Clean Air Act and Beyond
Aug 13, 2026
Unknown duration
SEER100: The Evolution of Environmental Law & SEER
Aug 10, 2026
Unknown duration
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/31/26 | SEER100: A Century of Environmental Enforcement & Litigation | In this episode of the SEER 100 podcast series, hosts Naveed Nanjee and Rishab Mahajan sit down with Todd Kim, former Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division and now a litigator at Pillsbury Law. This episode traces a century of environmental enforcement, from early common-law nuisance claims to today's sprawling statutory framework of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and CERCLA. Drawing on his experience across government and private practice, Mr. Kim discusses how landmark matters like the East Palestine train derailment and the Jackson, Mississippi water crisis shaped his "principled, practical, problem-solving" approach, and looks ahead to the challenges reshaping the field, including climate change litigation, PFAS contamination, environmental justice, and the growing role of AI in compliance and monitoring. | — | ||||||
| 8/26/26 | NEPA and Forest Law in the Face of Change | From timber sale agreements to conservation easements and project financing, join Dylan Sollfrank (Schwabe), Andrea Driggs (Holland & Hart), and Janet Howe (Holland & Hart) as they explore how NEPA impacts forest resources law—and how recent developments, including Seven County and changes to CEQ's rulemaking authority, are already reshaping how lawyers structure deals, conduct due diligence, and assess litigation risk. Keep the conversation going. Join SEER | — | ||||||
| 8/24/26 | SEER100: The Evolution of Federal Water Jurisdiction Under the Clean Water Act | While WOTUS serves as the jurisdictional foundation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the statute does not define the term. Since the CWA's enactment in 1972, determining the scope of WOTUS—and, in turn, the reach of federal regulatory authority—has remained a persistent and challenging issue in environmental law. By defining "navigable waters" only as "waters of the United States," Congress left it to the U.S. EPA, the U.S. Army Corps, and the courts to interpret a term with significant implications for federal-state authority, environmental protection, and private property rights. The definition of WOTUS has evolved through a combination of agency action and Supreme Court decisions, including Rapanos v. United States, and Sackett v. EPA (2012) (Sackett I ). These decisions have shaped how the agencies interpret jurisdiction, particularly with respect to wetlands. The split Rapanos decision introduced competing analytical frameworks, further contributing to longstanding uncertainty. In this episode, Professor Royal Gardner will provide a high-level overview of these developments, placing recent changes in context and offering insight into the current and future scope of federal jurisdiction under the CWA. Keep the conversation going. Join SEER | — | ||||||
| 8/13/26 | SEER100: The Clean Air Act and Beyond | Join Professor Richard Lazarus of Harvard Law School, author of The Rule of Five, and one of the nation's leading scholars of environmental law, for a discussion on the evolution of environmental law through the lens of the Clean Air Act and other landmark environmental statutes. Drawing on his experience arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court and advising policymakers across multiple administrations, he explores the challenges of applying decades-old laws to modern issues such as climate change, the impact of recent Supreme Court decisions, and the opportunities ahead for the next generation of environmental lawyers. He also examines how regulatory agencies, courts, and Congress have shaped the trajectory of environmental protection and what those dynamics mean for the future of environmental law. Keep the conversation going. Join SEER | — | ||||||
| 8/10/26 | SEER100: The Evolution of Environmental Law & SEER | As the inaugural episode in this series, this conversation takes a broad look at the evolution of environmental law and the Section's role in shaping the field over time. The panel of former SEER Chairs includes moderator Alex Dunn, President & CEO of CropLife America and former EPA Assistant Administrator, and speakers John Cruden, Principal at Beveridge & Diamond and former Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. DOJ, and Carol Dinkins, former U.S. Deputy Attorney General under President Ronald Reagan. Drawing on decades of leadership across government, private practice, and industry, the speakers reflect on landmark developments in environmental law, the evolution of SEER's influence within the profession, and the challenges and opportunities shaping the field's future. Together, they consider how SEER can continue to contribute meaningfully to the next chapter of environmental law. Keep the conversation going. Join SEER | — | ||||||
| 7/6/26 | tribal timber managementtrust resources+4 | Chris King | Whitley Law FirmU.S. Department of the Interior+1 | — | tribal timbertrust responsibilities+5 | — | 36m 56s | ||
| 6/30/26 | ESG developmentssustainability+4 | Josh GalperinLauren Lynam+1 | Pace UniversityYale School of the Environment+1 | — | ESGsustainability+5 | — | 25m 42s | ||
| 5/14/26 | Endangered Species Actlitigation+5 | Murray FeldmanSam Kalen | Holland & Hart LLPIndiana University McKinney School of Law+2 | — | Endangered Species ActESA+7 | — | 33m 19s | ||
| 12/5/25 | forest lawpublic land management+3 | Professor John Leshy | Our Common GroundWhat We Talk About When We Talk About Love | United States | forest lawpublic lands+5 | — | 50m 07s | ||
| 10/28/25 | emerging contaminantssupply chain management+4 | Juge GreggSal Giolando+1 | Crowell & MoringGeosyntec Consultants, Inc.+1 | — | emerging contaminantssupply chain+5 | — | 39m 35s | ||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 9/25/25 | emerging contaminantsvehicle emissions+4 | Greg EvansSean Dixon | 6PPDUniversity of Toronto+1 | — | emissionsenvironmental concerns+6 | — | 46m 44s | ||
| 9/3/25 | emerging contaminantspharmaceuticals+4 | Bill ArnoldEva Weiler+1 | titanium dioxideUniversity of Minnesota+2 | U.S.EU | emerging contaminantspharmaceuticals+5 | — | 32m 01s | ||
| 8/15/25 | emerging contaminantsethylene oxide+4 | Rebecca PritchettHeather Lynch+1 | ethylene oxideMaynard Nexsen+2 | — | ethylene oxideemerging contaminants+5 | — | 30m 08s | ||
| 6/30/25 | ESG developmentsclimate disclosure+4 | Lauren LynamMorgan Martin | SECDepartment of Labor+1 | U.S.Canada+2 | ESGclimate disclosure+5 | — | 19m 06s | ||
| 6/16/25 | microplasticsenvironmental regulation+4 | Jennifer F. NovakTalia Gordner+1 | Law Office of Jennifer F. NovakMcMillan LLP+4 | — | microplasticsenvironment+5 | — | 42m 35s | ||
| 5/22/25 | Toxic Substances Control Actregulatory compliance+5 | Lynn L. Bergeson | Holland & KnightBergeson & Campbell+2 | — | TSCAEPA+7 | — | 36m 04s | ||
| 5/9/25 | wildfire crisiscommunity resilience+5 | Doug Green | Headwaters EconomicsForest Resources Committee | Los AngelesUnited States | wildfirecommunity planning+5 | — | 28m 30s | ||
| 5/5/25 | EPA authorityClean Water Act+4 | Tim KellyMisha Tseytlin | EPACity and County of San Francisco+3 | — | EPAClean Water Act+5 | — | 36m 44s | ||
| 2/28/25 | The Future of NEPA: 2025 and Beyond | The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) landscape is shifting fast. With major developments like Eagle County, Marin Audubon, Section 5 of President Trump's Unleashing American Energy Executive Order, and several critical cases on the horizon, the way NEPA is applied and interpreted is set for a major transformation. Join Susan Jane Brown (Silvix Resources) in a thought-provoking discussion with Ted Boling (Perkins Coie Partner, former member of the Council on Environmental Quality) and Dinah Bear (former General Counsel of the Council on Environmental Quality). Together, they'll break down these pivotal changes, what they mean for environmental policy, and how NEPA's role may evolve in the years ahead. Don't miss this essential conversation for legal professionals, policymakers, and anyone invested in the future of environmental law. | — | ||||||
| 2/7/25 | Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West: Episode 3 - Conservation Implications | In the third episode of the Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West series, Andrew Kihn is joined by Susan Jane Brown, Principal and Chief of Silvix Resources, a nonprofit environmental law firm. Together, they explore the implications of the ongoing workforce challenges on the conservation, stewardship, and restoration of western public lands. The two discuss the often fraught relationship between communities dependent on timber harvest and conservation interests, and Susan Jane Brown elucidates the opportunities and imperatives of coalition building across the divide. | — | ||||||
| 1/2/25 | Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West: Episode 2 - The Role of Land Management Policy | In the second episode of the Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West series, Andrew Kihn returns, joined by Travis Joseph, President and CEO of the American Forest Resource Council. Together, they delve into the role of land management policies in addressing workforce challenges from the perspective of the timber trade association. Building on the foundation laid in the first episode, this discussion highlights how policy solutions can mitigate the workforce shortages tied to the ongoing closures of lumber mills in the American West. Travis Joseph provides insights into how these closures impact both the timber industry and the broader regional economy, offering actionable approaches to support sustainable forest management and workforce retention. | — | ||||||
| 12/16/24 | Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West: Episode 1 - The Economic Landscape | From the Forest Resources Committee comes a new series, Mill Closures and Workforce Shortages in the West, which examines legal and policy solutions to workforce challenges linked to the alarming rate of lumber mill closures in the American West. These closures have far-reaching implications for regional forest health and economic vitality. Mill owners cite various reasons for shutting down, from global market pressures to regional regulatory hurdles, with one recurring challenge: attracting and retaining a skilled workforce. In this first episode, Andrew Kihn joins Jesse Wade, economist and director of tax and trade policy analysis for the National Association of Home Builders, to explore the economic and policy landscape driving these issues. | — | ||||||
| 12/6/24 | What's Next in the Wide Wide World of WOTUS? | This podcast featuring Susan L. Stephens (Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.), Kim Diana Connolly (University at Buffalo School of Law, State University of New York), and Sarah P. Jarboe (English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley, LLP) provides a succinct summary of the history of federal regulation of wetlands under section 404 of the Clean Water Act, outlining the seminal Supreme Court decisions that steered the agency rulemaking and set the stage for the Sackett decision. The speakers delve into the Rapanos case and subsequent rulemaking, explaining how these developments informed the Supreme Court, led to multiple lawsuits across multiple states, and culminated in the Court's strongly-worded opinion in U.S. v. Sackett that virtually everyone agrees served to narrow the scope of federal jurisdiction over wetlands. Importantly, listeners will hear the latest updates in the litigation challenging the most recent agency rulemaking, how federal courts are interpreting Sackett across the country, and how federal agencies are handling requests for jurisdictional determinations under the regulatory regime that Sackett left in its wake. Tune in to hear their predictions on what comes next. For the latest jurisdictional announcements, visit https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory-Program-and-Permits/juris_info/. For more content from these speakers, get their book Wetlands Law and Policy: Understanding Section 404, Second Edition. | — | ||||||
| 11/26/24 | Shell v Milieudefensie: European Climate Case & Regulatory Backdrop | In this episode, Rhys Davies (Kirkland & Ellis International LLP) joins Natalia Urzola (SJD Candidate, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University) to discuss the Court of Appeal's decision in The Hague, Netherlands, in Shell v. Milieudefensie. The court determined that while Shell has obligations to reduce its scope 3 emissions, it is not required to meet a specific reduction target. The podcast explores this ruling in the context of existing and upcoming EU regulatory frameworks, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. It also compares these EU requirements with climate-related regulations in other jurisdictions and examines the broader implications for global businesses. Join Rhys Davies and an expert panel at the ABA CLE Webinar, "Corporate Climate Reporting Requirements: A Fast-Changing Landscape," on Tuesday, December 10, 2024, from 12:00 to 1:30 PM CST. Don't miss this insightful discussion on the evolving landscape of corporate climate reporting. Register here: Corporate Climate Reporting Requirements: A Fast-Changing Landscape | — | ||||||
| 10/18/24 | After Biden, The Realigned Rubik's Cube on Energy, Land Use, and Environmental Law | In this podcast Steven Ferrey (Suffolk University Law School) and Steve Weissman (Center for Law, Energy & the Environment), two experts in environmental/energy/land use law analyzing what became a legal Rubik's Cube with many different moving pieces to be realigned by attorneys and clients. New policy is changing electric power to move most of the U.S. economy rapidly to utilize electric power in lieu of conventional direct use of fossil fuels for heating, vehicles, and industry. This fundamental transformation occurs amid demands for much more electric power for artificial intelligence, data centers, and cryptocurrency mining, with the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA declaring that "The electric power sector is among the largest in the U.S. economy, with links to every other sector." This podcast identifies multiple resulting new challenges and provides legal "workarounds" regardless of who sits in the White House. French President Macron warned the U.S. Congress: "We're killing our planet. Let us face it. There is no Planet B." As the United States now rapidly responds to move to clean energy to power our future, in mid-2024 the Supreme Court fundamentally altered legal options: Creating a new major questions doctrine fundamentally reducing presidential power particularly related to energy, clean air, and climate; Critically "overruling" the most cited Supreme Court decision in the last 50 years, which also involves the environment Eliminating the ability of certain federal agencies enforcing laws to impose civil fines; and Extending dramatically the statute of limitations to challenge federal regulations affecting environment/energy/land-use (renewable electricity is less dense and requires five to ten times as much land as conventional generation of electricity) This podcast provides a user-friendly road map through this fast-realigning legal maze, and for those interested this podcast is backed up by a new ABA book (Powering the Future: A Lawyer's Guide to Clean Energy) containing all precedent and providing state-by-state charts analyzing barriers, legal differences, and how lawyers may take advantage of achievable workarounds region-by-region. | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 86
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart history for Environmental Law Explored: A Podcast SEERies
Peaked at #6 in South Korea, top 10 in 1 of 12 tracked markets, currently #6 in South Korea.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Korea | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| CO | — | #20 | #20 | — |
| United States | — | #25 | #25 | — |
| HU | — | #26 | #26 | — |
| TR | — | #29 | #29 | — |
| France | — | #39 | #39 | — |
| TH | — | #49 | #49 | — |
| South Africa | — | #55 | #55 | — |
| AT | — | #65 | #65 | — |
| CH | — | #124 | #124 | — |
| Brazil | — | #166 | #166 | — |
| United Kingdom | — | #187 | #187 | — |
Chart Positions
12 placements across 12 markets.
Chart Positions
12 placements across 12 markets.