About this episode
Dan and James discuss a proposed post-publication review process triggered by citation counts and alternative uses of almetrics for immediate critique.
Dan and James discuss a recent piece that proposes a post-publication review process, which is triggered by citation counts. They also cover how an almetrics trigger could be alternatively used for a more immediate post-publication critique. Links The Chonicle piece by Andrew Gelman and Andrew King [Free to read with email registration] The paper by Peder Isager and collegues on how to decide what papers we should replicate. Here is the preprint . The ERROR project Other links Everything Hertz on Bluesky Dan on Bluesky James on Bluesky Everything Hertz on Bluesky Citation Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2025, Mar 2). 189: Crit me baby, one more time, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3X5UR Support Everything Hertz
People in this episode
Hosts: Dan, James
Topics covered
- post-publication review
- citation counts
- almetrics
- critique
Keywords
- science
- social science
- research
- publication
More episodes of Everything Hertz
- 195: Living meta-analysis · January 14, 2026 · 37 min
- 194: Author verification · November 10, 2025 · 44 min
- 193: The pop-up journal · August 7, 2025 · 59 min
- 192: Outsourcing in academia · July 1, 2025 · 48 min
- 191: Cleaning up contaminated medical treatment guidelines · June 3, 2025 · 48 min
- 190: What happens when you pay reviewers? · April 2, 2025 · 44 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Everything Hertz podcast page.