357. Influencer Red Flags Miniseries, Part 14: “There’s no evidence…”

357. Influencer Red Flags Miniseries, Part 14: “There’s no evidence…”

From Filter It Through a Brain Cell by Kathy Gibbens

April 9, 2026 · 11 min · Season 2 · Episode 357

About this episode

This episode explores biases in influencer statements and encourages listeners to recognize fallacies.

In this miniseries, we are spotting Biases in the Wild and looking at the phrases that online Influencers say and the biases behind them.   Want to test yourself on how well you can recognize fallacies in real life?   Take the Meme Fallacy Quiz!   www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz Learn more about Crazy Thinkers membership where you can practice critical thinking using real-life memes, articles & headlines :   www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/crazy Here's how you can purchase the Logical Fallacies ebook:      https://www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/offers/z6xbAcB2 Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you!    think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up on my email list at:   www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/contact   Learn more about Women in Apologetics Conference: www.womeninapologetics.com     Learn more about Summit ministries: www.summit.org/braincell  use code: BRAINCELL26    Learn more about Classical Conversations: www.classicalconversations.com/filterit       Thank you to our…

People in this episode

Host: Kathy Gibbens

Topics covered

  • biases
  • influencers
  • critical thinking
  • logical fallacies
  • education

Keywords

  • influencer red flags
  • biases
  • logical fallacies
  • critical thinking
  • Meme Fallacy Quiz

Sponsors

CTC Math

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Crazy Thinkers, Women in Apologetics Conference, Summit ministries, Classical Conversations

More episodes of Filter It Through a Brain Cell

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Filter It Through a Brain Cell podcast page.