Finding Nancy: The Nancy Guthrie Investigation

The first Nancy Guthrie ransom note contains details that only someone standing inside her house could have known, and Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer lay out exactly what those details are and what they mean six months into this investigation. Released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31, the first letter opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and references a white smart watch on the floor by the bed and a destroyed flood light out back. It reads like a script. A second note, arriving with no demand at all, claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, says she's buried in nature, and hopes her children find peace, reading more like a confession than a threat. The team weighs whether the same person wrote both. Coffindaffer's trace of the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet shows the only money that ever moved into it was roughly three hundred dollars, sent by the FBI itself on February 10 and never touched again. No ransom was ever paid, despite Savannah Guthrie's public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to the wallet include the exact words Savannah said on camera, meaning a direct line to whoever controls it has existed the entire time and was never answered. Sheriff Nanos calls his relationship with the FBI great while thousands of hours of video remain unreviewed, and search teams have returned to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Every thread, traced in one place. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Sheriff Nanos sat down for his six-month message on the Nancy Guthrie case and called his office's relationship with the FBI great. In the same stretch, the ransom letters were finally released, and Nanos acknowledged thousands of hours of video still haven't been reviewed. Six months into the disappearance of a 74-year-old woman taken from her own Tucson home. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to say what most people watching that message were thinking, and to bring receipts nobody else has.Her receipts come off the blockchain. After the Pima County Sheriff's Office accidentally printed the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet address on a media release, Coffindaffer traced every transaction on it. The demand was allegedly four million dollars. The wallet's entire history is one deposit: roughly three hundred dollars in Bitcoin, moved by the FBI on February 10, never touched again. No ransom was ever paid — which sits uneasily beside the family's public statement that they did their part.The wallet also carried messages, written directly onto the blockchain, including the exact words Savannah Guthrie said on camera about being willing to pay. An open channel to the alleged kidnapper existed for six months. It was never answered. Coffindaffer explains what that silence tends to mean, and why the answer changes depending on whether Nancy's captors were organized professionals or a hired man in over his head.That split is her other headline: she believes the two ransom notes came from two different authors. One wrote threats on a schedule. One wrote an apology that reads like it was drafted with a death penalty statute in mind.This channel exists to keep Nancy Guthrie's case from going quiet. This episode is the loudest it's been in months.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #RansomNote #MissingPerson #JenniferCoffindaffer

Eight sentences. No location. No demands. The second note told the family Nancy died shortly after she was taken, said it was heart related, and ended with an apology. The writer walked away from six million dollars and a family that had already publicly said they would pay.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the second note line by line — the phrase buried in nature, the claim about her condition from someone who was inside her house, and the question that sits underneath all of it: is this a man feeling guilt, or a man who never had anything to sell?Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of The Minds of Mass Killers.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #RansomNote #Kidnapping #PimaCounty #ForensicPsychology #TrueCrime #DeathNote

Sheriff Nanos went on camera and stated what happened to the only man convicted in Nancy Guthrie's disappearance — and he got it wrong. The actual plea deal for Derrick Callella is probation on harassment charges. He hasn't been sentenced yet. Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired FBI, breaks down what it means when the lead investigator can't describe the outcome of his own case. This conversation covers the FBI-sheriff communication breakdown, Savannah Guthrie's latest plea and the shift in her language from hope to something closer to demand, and a disturbing home invasion thirty miles from Nancy's house where the suspect matches the porch figure's height. Six months into this case, the reward sits at over a million dollars. No one has been named. No one has been arrested. And the man in charge just got his own scoreboard wrong.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PimaCounty #SheriffNanos #Tucson #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #MissingPerson

Anger didn't work. Reward money didn't work. The biggest law enforcement mobilization in the country didn't work. So on July 27th, Savannah Guthrie tried the one thing she had left. She recorded a video, addressed it directly to whoever took her mother, and offered something that nobody in this family has offered before. Not a deal. Not a demand. Something harder than both.The video arrived the same week the first ransom note was read publicly for the first time — on Crime Junkie, with details about the inside of Nancy's house that reportedly hadn't been released. It arrived days after the FBI director accused the Pima County Sheriff of costing the investigation critical evidence, and the sheriff's office responded by redirecting all ransom questions to the FBI. This episode walks through every word of Savannah's plea, what it tells you about what this family believes happened to Nancy, and the institutional failure that left a daughter with no option except a camera and a prayer that someone's conscience still works.END LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #PimaCounty #Missing #CrimeJunkie #Kidnapping

Every new development in the Nancy Guthrie case seems to raise more questions than it answers, and this one might be the most infuriating yet. The man who sent the Guthrie family fake bitcoin ransom demands has been sentenced, and Tony Brueski breaks down why the punishment doesn't come close to matching what he put this family through. The charge: harassment, reduced down from something far more serious. The sentence: five years of probation, with every count running concurrently instead of stacking up. Retired FBI special agent Jennifer Coffindaffer called the result a travesty, warning it could embolden the growing list of copycats agents are now tracking under one name, the TMZ Twelve. Underneath that plea deal sits a four-million-dollar ransom note with an escalating threat, and a second, colder letter sent only to local television stations, apologizing and calling Nancy's death an accident. Both were reportedly traced to the same IP address, one of the few concrete threads investigators have. Porch Guy, a figure tied to the case, is still out there, unidentified. And the case keeps producing friction beyond the hoaxer. Sheriff Chris Nanos has faced pointed questions about discrepancies in his own record, at one point telling a reporter to enjoy his hit piece rather than answer. The FBI and the Sheriff's Department can't agree on jurisdiction, can't agree on which ransom notes are genuine, and a retired agent says there's real internal disagreement over whether some of the evidence is even legitimate. Kash Patel told a podcast his agents were locked out for days, yet one of his own special agents had already appeared beside Sheriff Nanos at a press conference, with a plane reportedly fueled and waiting. Nancy Guthrie is still missing. Here's everything on the record. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #JusticeForNancy #MissingPerson #FBI #RansomNote #TrueCrimePodcast #CrimeNews #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity

Six months into the search for Nancy Guthrie, this episode goes deeper into the one piece of evidence that may matter more than everything else combined: a note her family received that investigators still won't rule out. She was eighty-four, last seen the night blood was found on her porch and a masked figure appeared on her own doorbell camera. Since then, more than one note claiming responsibility has surfaced. Most have been confirmed as hoaxes. The one that hasn't is reportedly the one that changes how this entire case should be read, including what it may confirm about her fate. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team break down what that note reportedly says, how it lines up against the blood evidence and the doorbell footage, and why the FBI continues to publicly frame this as a kidnapping-for-ransom case even as the physical evidence complicates that theory. The show lays out a detailed theory of what happened that night, built entirely on what's been confirmed so far, including the possibility that whoever was involved never intended for the night to end the way it reportedly did. This episode also looks closely at the toll six months of uncertainty has taken on Savannah Guthrie, who has continued to appear on national television throughout the search for her mother, and asks what the public owes families like hers when a case is this drawn out. For everyone who has followed Nancy Guthrie's case from the beginning, this is the update that finally moves the timeline forward. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #NancyGuthrieCase #TrueCrimePodcast #MissingPersons #FBI #Arizona #UnsolvedCase #ColdCase #HiddenKillers

Nancy Guthrie has now been missing for five months, taken from her Tucson home at 84 years old, and the case has produced more written communications than actual leads. Start with the notes. One reportedly came from the man who took her, describing her as at rest somewhere in nature. A second, sent to a Tucson television station days later, was described by law enforcement as a legitimate communication from the actual kidnappers, and reportedly claimed she had died shortly after being taken. If real, it may be the closest thing to a written confession this case has produced. Then there's TMZ. One tipster emailed the outlet claiming urgency had passed. A separate, repeat emailer has claimed to have a phone containing video of Nancy and her alleged kidnapper from what was probably her last day. The FBI has already arrested multiple people for sending fake ransom notes tied to this case, and Sheriff Nanos has dismissed the newest claim as likely another one. But the FBI is reportedly investigating that same emailer at the same time, a contradiction no one in law enforcement has explained. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta break down what each communication actually proves, how investigators try to authenticate a note when there's no body, and why efforts to independently confirm Nancy's death have reportedly failed. A first note demanded millions. A second offered her body back for close to the same amount. Whether that points to one plan falling apart or two people working the same case is still an open question. All claims here are reported and unconfirmed, and no one has been charged. This is everything filed and reported so far, laid out in order. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #BobMotta #Tucson #PimaCounty #TrueCrime

Five months after Nancy Guthrie was allegedly taken from her Tucson home, the sheriff leading the case went on local radio and said he thinks the FBI has made “a number of arrests” for fake ransom notes. He thinks. The lead investigator doesn’t know the details of what the FBI has done inside his own investigation.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take apart the listener questions that keep flooding the comments — starting with what the sheriff’s uncertainty tells you about the gap between these agencies. Nanos is dismissing the TMZ emailer as a fraud while the FBI is reportedly spending resources to identify that person. Harvey Levin offered to pay the Bitcoin and follow the money. The FBI ghosted him, then told him to stop.The arrests, the agency friction, the emailer who keeps coming back, the million-dollar reward nobody claims — and a sheriff under recall pressure who sounds like he’s learning about FBI activity from the same news cycle as everyone else. Tony and Robin push into all of it. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #FBI #ChrisNanos #HarveyLevin #PimaCounty #JusticeForNancy

Behind the headlines, the Nancy Guthrie case may be quietly stuck. Air Mail's Howard Blum reports that the investigators themselves fear an early mistake cost them their best chance to solve the abduction of the 84-year-old grandmother. Suspects reportedly hauled in and released. Leads going nowhere. The task force back on the ransom notes because the trail offered nothing newer. Brian Entin's sources describe the same vanishing act.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer takes it apart. She explains what it signals when agents admit fear about their own case, whether clearing suspect after suspect is real movement or none at all, and how a Bitcoin misstep can hobble an investigation. And she confronts the piece that won't add up — a kidnapper who demanded millions and never touched the money.If cash was the goal, why abandon it? How do cases like this actually end? And is "nobody knows" the truth, or just the public version? All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A Hidden Killers conversation on the Nancy Guthrie case.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FBI #PimaCounty #MissingPerson #Tucson #Bitcoin #JenniferCoffindaffer

It started as a search for answers and turned into a pile of contradicting notes. In the Nancy Guthrie case, one message reportedly tied to her abductor says the 84-year-old is "buried with nature." A separate sender told TMZ "time is no longer of the essence." One outlet reports the kidnapper apologized; TMZ says no such thing was ever written. The story can't keep its own facts straight.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sorts it out. She explains how investigators authenticate an anonymous note with no body behind it, why the bureau reportedly couldn't confirm Nancy was dead, and what a real informant looks like versus a scam. She digs into the strangest contradiction of all — a first note demanding millions, a second offering her body back for nearly the same price.One collapsing plan, or two separate hands? A confession, or a misread? Coffindaffer lays out what the messages reveal about whoever wrote them — and why the contradictions matter as much as the words. All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A Hidden Killers conversation on the Nancy Guthrie case.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RansomNote #PorchGuy #FBI #Tucson #PimaCounty #JenniferCoffindaffer

An anonymous tip pointed to a shallow grave near the border. Nancy lives less than seventy miles from Mexico. She was reportedly taken from her bed without shoes, without medication, in the middle of the night. An eighty-four-year-old woman who could barely walk. Getting her out of that house and into another country required planning, a vehicle, a route, and a destination.Now connect the dots. The wrong-house theory says the masked man was looking for the gem vault next door. Google Maps pins both houses at the same address. He covered the camera with weeds — meaning he’d never been there before. He was inside for forty-five minutes. If he realized he had the wrong target, what happened next? The Mexico tip may be the answer — the crew needed to move Nancy because she’d seen them, and the border was an hour away.Robin Dreeke examines whether the Mexico lead and the wrong-house theory describe two stages of the same botched operation, what the behavioral evidence says about the intruder’s original plan, and what this means for the investigation as it approaches five months without a public identification.A look back at the most compelling stories of the week.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #Mexico #WrongHouse #FBI #DoorbellCamera #Tucson #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CatalinaFoothills

For everyone who has followed the Nancy Guthrie case from the start, this is the full legal picture pulled into one place — and the uncomfortable truth it points to: there may be a confession in writing, and still no one in custody.It's a legal breakdown with former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis and retired FBI agent Robin Dreeke.Tony Brueski walks all three fronts. The note first — sent to a Tucson newsroom, asking for nothing, kept quiet for months, and apparently describing how this ended. Tony breaks down whether it can anchor a no-body homicide case and how felony-murder law could spare prosecutors from proving intent at all.Then the investigation that's supposed to deliver justice for the 84-year-old mother of Savannah Guthrie. The sheriff who ran it faces a perjury referral to the state Attorney General. The scene wasn't secured. Searches were called off. DNA pointed at the wrong man. Tony lays out how each failure becomes a defense attorney's opening, and whether the case is already compromised.And finally the people hurt along the way: a cleared family still branded guilty, and an innocent schoolteacher named online as the figure at Nancy's door. The sheriff told him to sue. No one has. Tony explains who actually has a defamation claim, why so few ever reach a courtroom, and where the online crowd crosses into conduct a prosecutor can charge.A confession on paper. An investigation in question. Innocent people paying the price. This is where the Nancy Guthrie case truly stands — and why an answer still feels so far away.The full conversation is inside.END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags: #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NoBodyHomicide #Perjury #Defamation #Tucson #PimaCounty #FelonyMurder