About this episode

Bruce Pardy discusses the Supreme Court's potential to reinterpret the Constitution and the implications of the notwithstanding clause.

If you think the Supreme Court will be reluctant to rewrite the Constitution, as Ottawa wants it to by handcuffing Section 33, then you haven’t been paying attention, as Bruce Pardy tells Brian. It doesn’t matter that the notwithstanding clause explicitly gives parliaments the right to override certain court rulings, or that it was key to the Charter of Rights being passed in the first place, says Pardy, a constitutional scholar at Queen’s University. The rule of Canadian constitutional decisions is that there are no rules. For decades, justices have simply invented interpretations and dreamt up Charter “values” that align with their left-wing politics. And our constitution is conveniently designed to keep that happening — forever. (Recorded March 27, 2026) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

People in this episode

Host: Brian

Guest: Bruce Pardy

Topics covered

• Supreme Court
• notwithstanding clause
• constitutional law
• Charter of Rights
• judicial interpretation

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Queen’s University, Ottawa

Books & works: Charter of Rights

More episodes of Full Comment

• Liberals are ‘hijacking’ the Charter, says Canada’s last living framer of the Constitution · April 27, 2026 · 51 min
• Trump’s plan for Cuba isn’t what you’ve been told · April 20, 2026 · 59 min
• Canada’s defence is still a mess despite Ottawa’s NATO-spending claims · April 13, 2026 · 54 min
• Mark Carney is about to get hammered left and right by populism · April 6, 2026 · 1h 0m
• What happened to the Mark Carney who promised to make things better? · March 23, 2026 · 56 min
• The former CBC host blowing the lid off its bias and dysfunction · March 16, 2026 · 59 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Full Comment podcast page.