About this episode
Annabel Brett discusses the concept of moral possibility and its implications for legal obligation and political agency.
Legal scholar Annabel Brett explores the idea of “moral possibility”—the boundary between what laws demand and what people can realistically or ethically be expected to do. Drawing from early modern thinkers like Aquinas, Suarez, and Hobbes, Brett shows how moral impossibility has long shaped debates about legal obligation, resistance, and political agency. Commentators Melissa Lane and David Dyzenhaus join the discussion, examining how this concept applies to everything from climate action and military conscription to unjust regimes and democratic norms. Together, they highlight how institutions, customs, and time shape the space between legal duty and human capacity—and why recognizing this gap is vital to both justice and legitimacy. Series: "UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures" [Public Affairs] [Humanities] [Show ID: 40431]
People in this episode
Guest: Annabel Brett
Topics covered
- moral possibility
- legal obligation
- political agency
- climate action
- military conscription
- unjust regimes
- democratic norms
Keywords
- moral possibility
- legal obligation
- political agency
- climate action
- military conscription
- unjust regimes
- democratic norms
Mentioned in this episode
Books & works: Aquinas, Suarez, Hobbes
More episodes of Law and Justice (Audio)
- Linguistics and the Law · November 1, 2025 · 30 min
- Times of Change: Possibility Virtue and a Democratic Politics of Time · August 2, 2025 · 1h 58m
- Subjects and Citizens: The Possibility Condition Law and Democracy · July 5, 2025 · 1h 43m
- How the Supreme Court Divided America · July 2, 2024 · 57 min
- A New Paradigm in Youth Justice: Building Successful Diversion Programs · July 31, 2023 · 56 min
- Native Youth Court: Surviving Trauma Celebrating Tradition Connecting with Community · April 27, 2023 · 20 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Law and Justice (Audio) podcast page.