
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 2 chart positions in 2 markets.
By chart position
- 🇸🇦SA · Technology#108500 to 3K
- 🇹🇭TH · Technology#159500 to 3K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
300 to 1.8K🎙 Daily cadence·511 episodes·Last published 3d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
1K to 6K🇸🇦50%🇹🇭50% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
400 to 2.4K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 23 epsHost
Recent guests
Recent episodes
The Dark Side of MCP Servers
Jun 23, 2026
Unknown duration
Sandboxing, Agent Harnesses, and Agent Teamwork
Jun 19, 2026
Unknown duration
Zipline Roundtable episode: Building Real-Time ML Systems with Zipline + Chronon
Jun 17, 2026
Unknown duration
MCP Servers Are Becoming the UI for AI Agents
Jun 16, 2026
Unknown duration
MCP, Agents & the $40M Bet on Multiplayer AI
Jun 12, 2026
1h 20m 46s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/23/26 | ![]() The Dark Side of MCP Servers | Sam Partee (CTO & co-founder of Arcade.dev) and Nate Barbettini (Founding Engineer at Arcade.dev) sit down at the MCP Dev Summit to unpack what nobody wants to admit about the Model Context Protocol: the security model is still full of sharp edges. From tool poisoning and prompt injection to why OAuth got bolted onto the spec, this is a builder 's-eye view of where MCP breaks — and how to ship agents safely anyway.What we get into:🔓 OAuth on MCP — Why the spec adopted OAuth as its authorization standard, and the class of spoofing attacks it shuts down.☠️ Tool poisoning — How a malicious server hides instructions in tool descriptions, and why your agent trusts them by default.🧪 MCP Debugger & ToolBench — Shining a light on the rough edges by grading servers from S-tier to F-tier.🖥️ Sandboxing agents — Giving an agent a shell and a file system without handing over the keys to your machine.📜 Allow lists — Why MCP has client-level allow lists but skills mostly don't — and why that worries them.🔄 The auto-update problem — How skills and servers that silently update become a supply-chain risk ("rug pulls").✅ SOC 2, honestly — Why the controls are voluntary, misunderstood, and actually about best practices.🤖 AI-generated PRs — The new behaviors to watch for as agents start writing and merging code.If you build agents, ship MCP servers, or are responsible for AI security at your company, this one's for you.🔗 Links & ResourcesArcade.dev: https://www.arcade.devArcade MCP framework (GitHub): https://github.com/ArcadeAI/arcade-mcpSam Partee (GitHub): https://github.com/sparteeNate Barbettini (LinkedIn): https://www.linkedin.com/in/nbarbettiniMLOps.community: https://mlops.community⏱️ Timestamps[00:00] Skills, agents, and local context[08:36] MCP Debugger grades your server[10:34] Why AI clients are still buggy[20:54] Why agents shouldn’t always have shell access[22:44] “I have a spicy take.”[26:27] “Do not build your own auth.”[31:14] The “checking someone else’s email” problem[35:40] “OAuth is the best worst option.”[43:50] The future of AI entertainment[46:19] Tool poisoning explained[50:49] “Trust me, bro,” is not a security solution[52:45] MCP registries as the App Store model[1:00:28] AI-generated PRs and speed vs quality[1:02:37] Why behavior-driven development is coming back[1:08:11] Have we already reached AGI?#MCP #AIAgentSecurity #ToolPoisoning | — | ||||||
| 6/19/26 | ![]() Sandboxing, Agent Harnesses, and Agent Teamwork | Shahram Anver is the Co-Founder and CEO of Cleric, the autonomous AI SRE that investigates and root-causes production issues like an experienced teammate — often in under two minutes. Before Cleric, Shahram led MLOps, DevOps, and FinOps platform engineering at Gojek, Southeast Asia's super-app. In this conversation, he breaks down why production operations never kept pace with AI-accelerated development, and why the real unlock for an AI SRE isn't faster triage — it's an agent that *learns* and compounds operational memory across your whole org.In this episode:🔧 The on-call problem — Why one broken service still drags ten engineers onto a call, and how AI changes that🤖 What an AI SRE actually is — How Cleric investigates across your existing observability stack instead of adding another tool🧠 Learning over MTTR — Why Shahram argues the value isn't alert triage, it's an agent that gets better every investigation🪜 Ramping like a new engineer — Explore the environment, learn from the work, talk to the team🔁 The investigate–measure–learn loop — Turning what worked on one incident into context for the next🕸️ Knowledge graphs & operational memory — Mapping teams, clusters, and dependencies so insight from one team helps another⚡ Under two minutes to root cause — What "fast" really requires in a live production environment🚀 The road to autonomy — From assisted investigation toward self-healing infrastructureIf you're an SRE, platform engineer, DevOps lead, or anyone building or buying AI agents for production, this one's for you.🔗 Links & ResourcesCleric: https://cleric.aiShahram on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shahramanver/Willem Pienaar (Co-Founder/CTO): https://www.linkedin.com/in/willempienaar/Cleric launches the first self-learning AI SRE: https://cleric.ai/blog/cleric-launches-the-first-self-learning-ai-sreMLOps Community: https://mlops.communityJoin the community: https://go.mlops.community/slack⏱️ Timestamps[00:00] Tech Jargon Confusion[00:27] Harness vs Model[08:48] Model Evolution in Cleric[13:36] Sandboxing and Simulated Environments[20:40] Shifting AI Perceptions[24:10] Managing Humans vs Agents[31:32] Steering Parallel Agents[34:16] Human Decision Integration in Models[43:28] 80/20 Data Split[49:40] Becoming a Skill[53:35] 2027 Agent Autonomy[59:14] Agent Learning in Production[1:04:31] Software as Personal Capabilities[1:08:31] Vibe Coding vs Durability[1:18:23] Wrap up#AISRE #SiteReliabilityEngineering #AIAgents | — | ||||||
| 6/17/26 | ![]() Zipline Roundtable episode: Building Real-Time ML Systems with Zipline + Chronon | Zipline Roundtable episode: Building Real-Time ML Systems with Zipline + ChrononJoin the Community: https://go.mlops.community/YTJoinInGet the newsletter: https://go.mlops.community/YTNewsletterMLOps GPU Guide: https://go.mlops.community/gpuguideBig shout-out to ZiplineAI for the collaboration!// AbstractReal-time ML use cases like personalization and risk decisioning come with a unique set of challenges: serving fresh feature values at low latency for inference, generating temporally consistent backfills for training, and building complex chains of on-demand, batch, and streaming transformations. In this roundtable, practitioners from Intuit, CreditKarma, Depop, and OpenAI share how they use Zipline and the OSS Chronon project to solve these challenges and deploy real-time ML use cases in production.// BioGerman KrikorianGerman is a Software Engineer on the Feature Platform team at Credit Karma. Since joining the company during the early development of its recommendation system, they have played a key role in building and scaling the platform over the years. Their work focuses on feature pipelines and the feature store, which serves as critical infrastructure supporting numerous teams and business verticals across the organization.Ben MagyarBen is an engineer at Depop working on ML and data systems. Before Depop, he worked on Search at Etsy. Most of his work is around the infrastructure and operational problems that come with running ML systems at scale.Raj KatakamRaj architects ML Infrastructure at Credit Karma (Intuit). He holds a Master's in Software Engineering from Carnegie Mellon and a B.Tech in EECE from IIT Kharagpur. His interests include ML Infrastructure, Distributed Systems, Real-Time Data Processing, and Generative AI. His current focus is on providing feature engineering platforms, production GenAI infrastructure, vector databases, ML model serving, and MLOps pipelines for fraud detection, personalized recommendations, financial insights, and model explainability.Mick JermsurawongLed Flyte ML training/experimentation at Stripe, and now led Chronon for ML features at OpenAIHosted by Demetrios// Related LinksWebsite: https://zipline.ai/https://chronon.ai/~~~~~~~~ ✌️Connect With Us ✌️ ~~~~~~~Catch all episodes, blogs, newsletters, and more: https://go.mlops.community/TYExploreJoin our Slack community [https://go.mlops.community/slack]Follow us on X/Twitter [@mlopscommunity](https://x.com/mlopscommunity) or [LinkedIn](https://go.mlops.community/linkedin)] Sign up for the next meetup: [https://go.mlops.community/register]MLOps Swag/Merch: [https://shop.mlops.community/]Connect with Demetrios on LinkedIn: /dpbrinkmConnect with German on LinkedIn: /e2zdkwh8cxghydg/Connect with Raj on LinkedIn: /rajkiran2190Connect with Mick on LinkedIn:/mick-jermsurawong/ | — | ||||||
| 6/16/26 | ![]() MCP Servers Are Becoming the UI for AI Agents | Naseem Al-Naji is the co-founder of MCPcat.io and the creator of Opal — a builder with deep roots in privacy-first developer tooling. In this conversation, he breaks down why MCP servers have become a black box in production, and how MCPcat gives teams X-ray vision into how agents and users actually behave.What we get into:🐱 What MCPcat Is — Open-source analytics and live debugging built specifically for MCP servers🎬 Session Replay — Watch an agent's full journey through your server, tool call by tool call🎯 Agent Intent & Goals — Understand "why" a tool was called, not just that it was🔍 Trace Debugging — Find exactly where agents and users get stuck or confused🚨 Catching Hallucinations — How issue tracking surfaces when an LLM goes off the rails🔒 Privacy-First by Design — Client-side redaction so sensitive data never leaves your environment⚡ One-Line Integration — Python, TypeScript, and Go SDKs that drop into existing stacks📊 Works With Your Stack — Native support for OpenTelemetry, Datadog, and Sentry🚀 The Future of MCP — Where agent observability and the MCP ecosystem are headingIf you build, ship, or maintain MCP servers — or you're trying to figure out why your AI agents misbehave in production — this one's for you.🔔 Subscribe, like, and share for more conversations on agentic AI:▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AAIFAgenticConversations🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/033rZZJrQOVSSmhcStFhZA?si=rUNjFuNqRvGvAEWwqms7TALinks & Resources:🐱 MCPcat: https://mcpcat.io💻 MCPcat on GitHub: https://github.com/mcpcat👤 Naseem on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/naseem-al-naji🐙 Naseem on GitHub: https://github.com/naji247Timestamps:[00:00] Intro[01:41] MCP Needs Gatekeepers[06:32] Measuring MCP Success[13:57] MCPAT Feature Rollouts[18:50] MCP Server Query Optimization[26:48] UI Design Shift[29:14] MCP Server Design Choices[33:51] User Journey Traceability[40:40] Agent Experience Evaluation[45:23] AI Model Improvement Strategies#MCP #AIAgents #Observability | — | ||||||
| 6/12/26 | ![]() MCP, Agents & the $40M Bet on Multiplayer AI✨ | AI agentsenterprise AI+4 | Stanislas Polu | DustOpenAI+2 | — | DustAI agents+5 | — | 1h 20m 46s | |
| 6/12/26 | ![]() Agents & the $40M Bet on Multiplayer AI | Stanislas Polu is Co-Founder & CTO of Dust — the enterprise AI agent platform used by 51,000 workers at 3,000+ companies. Before Dust, he spent three years on OpenAI's research team under Ilya Sutskever, working on mathematical reasoning in language models, and prior to that was an engineer at Stripe. He brings a rare combination of frontier AI research and product-building experience to the enterprise agent space.Agents & the $40M Bet on Multiplayer AI // MLOps Podcast #384 with Stanislas Polu, Co-Founder & CTO of Dust🤖 What is Dust? — How Dust enables teams to build and deploy AI agents powered by internal company data, and why the "multiplayer AI" model is winning in enterprise.🧠 From OpenAI Research to Startup Founder — Stanislas's journey from studying mathematical reasoning in LLMs under Ilya Sutskever to co-founding an enterprise AI company in Paris with Gabriel Hubert.🚀 The $40M Series B — What Dust is building with fresh funding, the bet on human-agent collaboration as the future of work, and what "multiplayer AI" actually means in practice.🔄 The Outer-Loop Era — Stanislas's framework for thinking about where AI agents create the most value: not just automating tasks, but rewiring how work gets done across entire organizations.⚠️ What Most Enterprise AI Gets Wrong — The biggest mistakes companies make when deploying AI agents, why adoption fails, and how Dust achieves 70%+ weekly adoption rates.📊 Building Reliable Agent Infrastructure — Lessons from scaling to thousands of companies: observability, governance, data security, and why enterprise AI is harder than it looks.🛠️ Horizontal vs. Vertical AI Platforms — Why Dust chose to build a horizontal enterprise agent platform and how that decision shapes product, go-to-market, and technical architecture.This episode is essential for AI/ML engineers, enterprise AI leads, and anyone building or deploying AI agents at scale inside organizations.🔗 Links & Resources:• Dust: https://dust.tt• Stanislas Polu on X/Twitter: https://x.com/spolu• Dust on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dust-tt• Dust $40M Series B announcement: https://dust.tt/blog• "The Outer-Loop Era" talk by Stanislas (dotconferences): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_outer_loop• Dust + Stripe MCP integration: https://stripe.com/customers/dust• Dust + Datadog observability case study: https://datadoghq.com/case-studies/dust⏱️ Timestamps [00:00] Future of Work[00:19] Dust Scaling Lessons[04:44] Human-Agent Collaboration[14:24] Pod as Workspace[22:30] Work Flow Optimization[29:37] Multiplayer Collaboration Vision[39:55] Token Economics and Inference[47:20] AI Pricing Challenges[52:36] Dust vs Co-work[57:06] Agentic Work Infrastructure[1:04:23] Stateful Sandbox Challenges[1:09:58] Product Use Case Discussion[1:14:05] Agent Data Interaction Needs[1:20:09] Wrap up#EnterpriseAI #AIAgents #Dust | — | ||||||
| 6/9/26 | ![]() From Single-Player to Multi-Player: Operating AI Agents at Scale✨ | AI agentsmulti-agent systems+4 | James Everingham | Guild.aiNetscape+3 | — | AI agentsmulti-agent coordination+4 | — | 55m 54s | |
| 6/5/26 | ![]() The Control-vs-Magic Spectrum Building Agents✨ | AI agentsfintech+4 | Thiago Cardoso | LangGraphiFood+2 | — | agentic AIproduction scale+7 | — | 43m 18s | |
| 6/2/26 | ![]() Logs Are All You Need: Rethinking Observability with AI Agents✨ | observabilityAI agents+4 | Sherwood Callaway | SazabiDatadog+1 | — | observabilityAI+6 | — | 46m 39s | |
| 5/29/26 | ![]() AI Is Fast. AI Projects Are Slow. Let's Fix That.✨ | AI developmentAI infrastructure+4 | Joe MaionchiRod Christensen | RocketRideCrewAI+2 | — | AI Integrated Development Environmentopen-source AI pipeline+5 | — | 56m 47s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 5/28/26 | ![]() Architecting Modern AI Systems: Platforms, Agents, and Integration✨ | AI systemsagent-driven architectures+4 | Allen Roush | BuzzHPCOracle+4 | — | AI systemsautonomous architectures+5 | — | 56m 59s | |
| 5/28/26 | ![]() [Special Announcement] MLOps Community Linux Foundation✨ | MLOpsLinux Foundation+3 | — | Model Context Protocolgoose+7 | AmsterdamSan Jose | MLOps CommunityLinux Foundation+5 | — | 2m 19s | |
| 5/26/26 | ![]() Inside Just Eat's AI Lab: Voice Agents & Agentic Commerce✨ | AI and RoboticsVoice Assistants+4 | Guthrie CooperNidhi Sharma | Just Eat Takeaway.comRIVR+1 | ZurichMilton Keynes+2 | AI LabVoice Agents+5 | — | 1h 18m 38s | |
| 5/19/26 | ![]() Autonomous Agents at Work: From OpenClaw Hype to Enterprise Reality✨ | Autonomous AgentsAI Transformation+4 | Pramod Krishnan | OpenClawPwC US | — | OpenClawAI Governance+5 | PwC | 42m 19s | |
| 5/15/26 | ![]() Agents are Just While Loops✨ | long-running agentsML pipelines+3 | Hamza Tahir | KitaruZenML+2 | — | agentswhile loops+6 | — | 41m 11s | |
| 5/12/26 | ![]() The Latency Goldilocks Zone Explained | Rafael (Head of Innovation, iFood) and Daniel (Data and AI Manager, iFood) pull back the curtain on ILO-Agent — iFood's conversational AI ordering system built for 200 million users across Latin America. Recorded live at AI House Amsterdam, this conversation goes deep into the engineering and product decisions behind building recommendation systems and agentic AI, and why the speed of your AI's response might actually be destroying user trust.The Latency Goldilocks Zone Explained // MLOps Podcast #376 with iFood's Rafael Borger (Head of Innovation) and Daniel Wolbert (Data and AI Manager)🍕 Recommendation Systems at Scale — Why personalizing for 200M users with wildly different food tastes, budgets, and cultures is a fundamentally different problem than standard ML🤖 ILO-Agent Deep Dive — What iFood's conversational AI agent actually does, how it handles open-ended requests ("a romantic dinner for two, my wife hates onions"), and where it's headed⏱️ The Latency Goldilocks Zone — The fascinating insight that LLM responses can be too fast (users don't trust them) or too slow (users abandon) — and how to find the sweet spot🧠 Perceived vs. Actual Latency — Why showing progress indicators and partial results can make a 6-second response feel instant, and how iFood uses this in production🛒 The Tinder for Food Experience — How iFood is experimenting with swipe-based discovery to solve "I don't know what I want to eat" for millions of undecided users🗣️ Voice vs. Text AI Interfaces — Why voice ordering limits you to 6 items in 30 seconds, and why text-based agents need radically different output design🔗 Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Architectures — What happens when your customer support agent and your ordering agent need to collaborate, and the standardization challenges ahead📊 Measuring Product-Market Fit for AI — Why the Sean Ellis / Chanel score method breaks down in Brazil, and what iFood uses instead🏗️ Scalability vs. Ecosystem Health — The real tension between consuming partner APIs aggressively and keeping the food delivery ecosystem sustainable🌎 Building AI for Global-Local Markets — Why one-size-fits-all AI products fail and how iFood builds for cultural and economic diversity simultaneously. This episode is for ML engineers, AI product managers, and data scientists building production AI systems at scale — especially if you're working on recommendation, retrieval, or agentic systems in consumer apps.🔗 Links & ResourcesMLOps.community: https://mlops.communityAI House Amsterdam: https://aihouse.amsterdamiFood: https://www.ifood.com.br/iFood AILO launch coverage: https://tiinside.com.br/en/10/10/2025/ifood-lanca-ailo-assistente-de-ia-que-inaugura-pedidos-por-conversa/iFood AI case study (AWS): https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/ifood-bedrock/Related MLOps Community talk — "From Zero to AILO" by Nishikant Dhanuka & Chiara Caratelli: https://home.mlops.community/public/videos/from-zero-to-ailo-lessons-learned-from-building-ifoods-ai-agent-nishikant-dhanuka-and-chiara-caratelli-2025-11-25ZenML LLMOps database write-up on iFood's hyper-personalized agent: https://www.zenml.io/llmops-database/building-a-hyper-personalized-food-ordering-agent-for-e-commerce-at-scale⏱️ Timestamps[00:00] Recommending the unknown[00:18] Ailo Hyperpersonalization Insight[06:24] Predictive Personalization Insights[09:13] "Jet skis" of innovation[17:45] Consumer Behavior and Chatbots[26:33] Perceived Latency and Engagement[33:22] AI-driven UI Evolution[38:17] LCM Voice Mode Inquiry[45:20] Chat as Interface[47:46] Wrap up | — | ||||||
| 5/8/26 | ![]() Building MCP Before MCP Existed: Inside Despegar's Sofia Agent✨ | AI in travelmulti-agent systems+4 | Nicolas Alejandro Bogliolo | SofiaMCP+2 | Latin America | DespegarSofia+8 | — | 41m 13s | |
| 5/1/26 | ![]() Voice Agent Use Cases✨ | voice AIengineering tradeoffs+5 | Anurag Beniwal | AmazonElevenLabs | — | voice agentscustomer support+5 | Hyperbolic | 51m 04s | |
| 4/24/26 | ![]() The Creator of Superpowers: Why Real Agentic Engineering Beats Vibe Coding✨ | agentic engineeringsoftware development methodology+3 | Jesse Vincent | SuperpowersPrime Radiant | MIT | agentic codingClaude Code plugin+5 | — | 1h 06m 55s | |
| 4/21/26 | ![]() It's 2026, and We're Still Talking Evals✨ | AI evaluationLLM evaluation+2 | Maggie Konstanty | AI agentsfood ordering systems+5 | — | accuracy metricsuser drop-off+3 | — | 40m 56s | |
| 4/17/26 | ![]() Why Agents are Driving Software Development to the Cloud✨ | AI Coding AgentsCloud Computing+1 | Zach Lloyd | WarpOz+6 | — | collaborative toolsGitHub+2 | Hyperbolic | 51m 07s | |
| 4/14/26 | ![]() The Modern Software Engineer✨ | software engineeringAI+2 | Mihail Eric | CS146SAlexa+12 | Monaco | AI transformationsoftware architecture+1 | MLflow | 53m 37s | |
| 4/10/26 | ![]() We Cut LLM Latency by 70% in Production✨ | AI performancelatency+9 | Maher Hanafi | TensorRT LLMTensorRT+7 | — | LLMenterprise scale+3 | — | 1h 05m 20s | |
| 4/7/26 | ![]() Getting Humans Out of the Way: How to Work with Teams of Agents✨ | MLOpsAI+2 | Rob Ennals | BroomyUber+7 | — | agentsmicromanagement+2 | — | 50m 30s | |
| 4/3/26 | ![]() Fixing GPU Starvation in Large-Scale Distributed Training✨ | GPU starvationlarge-scale distributed training+3 | Kashish Mittal | Core Search RankingPetastorm+5 | — | PetastormGPU utilization+3 | — | 52m 48s | |
Showing 25 of 444
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart Positions
2 placements across 2 markets.
Chart Positions
2 placements across 2 markets.






















