
How the Agri-Stats Case Can Help Shape Treatment of Anticompetitive Information Exchanges: A Discussion Between Emily Bridges of the Food and Agriculture Impact Project and Professor Peter Carstensen
From Ruled by Reason by American Antitrust Institute
September 12, 2024 · 55 min
About this episode
Emily Bridges discusses the implications of the DOJ's case against Agri-Stats with antitrust scholar Peter Carstensen, focusing on information exchange in agricultural markets.
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, Emily Bridges of the Food and Agriculture Impact Project has a wide-ranging discussion with antitrust scholar Peter Carstensen about the role of information exchange in restricting competition in agricultural markets, focusing on how the DOJ's case against Agri-Stats addresses that threat. After covering the oligopolistic nature of many agricultural markets (2:45), the two do a deep dive on why information exchange can be so harmful to competition (11:04). Professor Carstensen explains how the law on information exchange has evolved and how that history has led to unfortunate ambiguity about the applicable standard (17:10). Professor Carstensen then explains why information exchange has been a particular problem in agricultural markets. He describes how recent cases in this area, including both private actions and the DOJ's case against the information aggregator, Agri-Stats, can play an important role in clarifying and strengthening enforcement against unjustified information exchanges (27:20). The discussion concludes with some thoughts about what we can expect from current trends in litigation over illegal information exchanges (48:50)…
People in this episode
Guests: Emily Bridges, Peter Carstensen
Topics covered
- information exchange
- anticompetitive behavior
- agricultural markets
- DOJ case
- legal standards
- litigation trends
Keywords
- Agri-Stats
- information exchange
- antitrust
- agriculture
- DOJ
- competition
- legal standards
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Food and Agriculture Impact Project, University of Arkansas School of Law, DOJ, Agri-Stats
More episodes of Ruled by Reason
- Making Big Tech Antitrust Remedies Stick Beyond the Courtroom: A Conversation with Ron Schnell · April 7, 2026 · 1h 1m
- Taking an "Extra" Look at Addressing Monopolization: A Conversation with Jennifer Sturiale · December 18, 2025 · 52 min
- The Three-Legged Stool of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: A Conversation with Michael Kades · November 24, 2025 · 36 min
- From Labor Market Theory to Antitrust Policy: A Conversation with Ioana Marinescu · October 10, 2025 · 42 min
- Monopolizing by Conditioning: A Conversation Between Jack Kirkwood and Daniel Francis, Jerry S. Cohen Award Winner for Antitrust Scholarship · August 20, 2025 · 46 min
- Applying Computer Science Principles to Police Modern Cartels: A Conversation with Giovanna Massarotto · July 9, 2025 · 38 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Ruled by Reason podcast page.