
Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast
by Bolder Advocacy
Is this your podcast?Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 1 chart position in 1 market.
By chart position
- 🇳🇿NZ · Non-Profit#4910K to 30K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
5K to 15K🎙 ~2x weekly·100 episodes·Last published 2d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
10K to 30K🇳🇿100% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
3K to 9K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 15 epsHost
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Can We Share That?
Sep 2, 2026
Unknown duration
Get Out the Vote
Aug 19, 2026
Unknown duration
Charitable Solicitation
Aug 5, 2026
Unknown duration
Forming a 501(c)(4)
Jul 22, 2026
Unknown duration
What Nonprofits Need to Know About Nominations
Jul 8, 2026
12m 27s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/2/26 | Can We Share That? | Working in coalition is one of the nonprofit sector's greatest strengths and can be especially powerful during election season. With the midterm elections around the corner, now is a good time for organizations to revisit their plans for election-related advocacy, including voter engagement, candidate education, and issue advocacy. A 501(c)(3) can collaborate with a 501(c)(4) and other nonprofits to advance common goals, pool resources, and build momentum. The key is knowing where collaboration ends and organizational boundaries begin, so allocate resources fairly, document cost-sharing agreements, and make sure each organization operates within the rules that apply to it. In this episode, we'll explore best practices for 501(c)(3)s collaborating and sharing resources with organizations operating under different tax rules during election season, including how to keep coalition work effective, compliant, and nonpartisan. Attorneys for this Episode: Maggie Ellinger-Locke Sarah Efthymiou Monika Graham 501(c)(3)s Must Remain Nonpartisan Internal Revenue Code: 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in partisan political activity on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office. The Facts & Circumstances Analysis The IRS uses a "facts and circumstances" analysis to determine whether a 501(c)(3)'s communication about an issue is genuinely nonpartisan or is a veiled attempt to influence the outcome of an election. Factors include whether the communication mentions or evaluates candidates, references a candidate or election, occurs close to an election, or addresses an issue that distinguishes the candidates. The IRS also considers the broader context, including the timing, targeted audience, relationship to candidates' or political parties' communications, and whether the organization has a history of discussing the issue outside election periods. No single factor is determinative for the IRS looks at the full picture. What are some best practices for engaging in coalition work during election season? Build out the coalition's structure in advance. Develop a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with coalition partners outlining shared goals, decision-making processes, communications, roles, and responsibilities. Establish written cost-sharing agreements in advance to specify how shared costs will be allocated. Clarify who is responsible for particular communications, activities, and resources. Have a clear plan for keeping the 501(c)(3)'s work completely independent from partisan coalition work. Questions to ask in advance: What are your shared goals as a coalition? Are you time-limited, meaning you plan to disband after the election, or do you plan to continue working together toward a shared policy goal? Who is a member of the coalition? How will you communicate? How will decisions get made? How formal or informal do you want the coalition to be? What are some best practices for sharing resources? What can organizations actually pool to increase their collective impact? Staff, volunteers, office space, equipment, communications, educational resources, and other shared assets can expand a coalition's reach and strengthen collaborative power. Organizations can share tools and capacity so long as they adhere to the rules that apply to each entity. Things to Consider: 501(c)(3) resources and funds cannot be used to subsidize partisan political activity. Manage the expectations and agreements before you get going. Questions to ask: How will the organization share those resources? What are you going to share? Who owns or controls the resource? Which organization is using it, and for what purpose? How will costs be allocated? What happens if the use of that resource changes during the campaign? Best Practices: Know the Rules & Maintain Clear Boundaries: Understand each organization's tax status; keep governance, finances, and branding separate; and ensure there is a method for preventing the (c)(3)'s work from becoming intertwined with partisan activity. Document & Allocate Resources Fairly: Use written agreements, allocate shared costs using a reasonable method, track staff time accordingly; and maintain records of expenses, reimbursements, and resource-sharing arrangements. Don't Blur Organizational Lines: Use separate websites, social media accounts, and email addresses; clarify roles and responsibilities for each activity and/or communication; and make sure (c)(3) staff, volunteers, and resources are used only for activities it can legally undertake. Avoid Free or Below-Market Resource Sharing: If a resource has value—such as email lists, mailing lists, or voter registration files —it generally should be reimbursed at fair market value or through a reasonable cost-allocation agreement. Best practice is to use a list broker. Renting or exchanging lists can raise other legal and/or tax questions. For example, while list rental income is generally considered royalty income (and exempt from UBIT), if rented to a campaign, this exception does not apply to rentals made to political campaigns or PACs (the IRS does consider this to be UBI and therefore subject to tax. Nonpartisan voter registration files may only be rented to a 501(c)(4) or 527 at fair market value or exchanged for data of equal value. Even then, the circumstances in which these agreements can be made are complex, so it's wise to get legal advice. What's the bottom line? Sharing resources can strengthen partnerships, reduce costs, and advance meaningful change. Coalition building is literally solidarity in action—organizations coming together to advance joint goals. And we know we are stronger together, so establish agreements upfront, allocate costs fairly, keep good records, and maintain clear organizational boundaries. When done thoughtfully, collaboration can amplify a unified voice and build momentum while protecting each organization's tax-exempt status. Resources The Connection 501(c)(3) & 501(c)(4) Collaboration Sample Allocation of Costs Agreement Rules of the Game: Can We Rent (Or Share) That? Comparison of 501(c)(3) & 501(c)(4) Permissible Activities Rules of the Game: A Guide to Election Related Activities for 501(c)(3)s | — | ||||||
| 8/19/26 | Get Out the Vote | Get Out the Vote (GOTV) efforts are one of the most impactful ways 501(c)(3) public charities can strengthen civic participation and help ensure communities have the tools and information they need to make their voices heard. From voter registration and education to reminders and access assistance, (c)(3) organizations can play an important role in helping people navigate the voting process while remaining nonpartisan. On this episode, we explore best practices for designing effective GOTV efforts, including how nonprofits can engage their communities, train staff and volunteers, and navigate election-related rules. Attorneys for this Episode: Monika Graham Natalie Ossenfort Victor Rivera 501(c)(3)s Must Remain Nonpartisan Internal Revenue Code: 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in partisan political activity (activity on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office). Keeping GOTV Efforts 501(c)(3) Safe Effective voter outreach for 501(c)(3)s is focused on expanding participation, not influencing who someone votes for. Therefore, (c)(3)s should refrain from using messages that support or oppose candidates, political parties, or groups of candidates. In addition, they should: · Make voter outreach activities available to all eligible voters · Ensure GOTV efforts are not coordinated with candidates or campaigns · Avoid targeting communities because they belong to a particular political party, voted a particular way in the past, or because they vote in a district where the race is likely to be close The IRS uses a facts and circumstances test when determining whether a 501(c)(3) has violated the rules against partisan electioneering. Building a Strong GOTV Effort · Start with your community. Use existing relationships and trusted communication channels to reach the people your organization serves. Connect with voters through tools and spaces they already use, such as text messages, social media, email newsletters, community events, and local partners. · Plan ahead. Start by understanding your community's needs. Then, establish goals and timelines, create written policies and training materials, and train staff and volunteers on nonpartisan rules, including the difference between organizational activities and personal political activity. · Build partnerships. Collaborate with community organizations, libraries, schools, faith-based organizations, and other trusted institutions to expand outreach and maximize impact. Just remember that if you are partnering with any organizations or entities that are not 501(c)(3)s, all of your collective work needs to remain nonpartisan. · Track and evaluate your efforts. Document outreach activities and program decisions, assess what worked, and incorporate lessons learned to strengthen future GOTV efforts. GOTV Activities 501(c)(3) Public Charities Can Conduct 501(c)(3) public charities can support voter participation by: · Registering voters through nonpartisan voter registration drives o NOTE: While this is true for public charities, private foundations have more restrictive rules related to voter registration activities and funding. · Reminding people about upcoming elections and encouraging them to participate · Sharing nonpartisan information that speaks to the voting process, including registration deadlines, polling locations, early voting, vote-by-mail options, and voter identification requirements · Helping reduce barriers to voting by providing nonpartisan assistance, such as transportation to the polls, language access resources, or accommodations for voters with disabilities Remember, some voter registration rules and other voter assistance requirements can vary by state and have probably been updated since the last election cycle, so it is important to train your staff and volunteers on the applicable (and current) rules. Just Remember: · In order to remain nonpartisan, 501(c)(3)s should not suggest who people should vote for in upcoming candidate elections. · It's not just the Internal Revenue Code you need to think about. Federal election law and state laws also have a lot to say about how nonprofits can engage in election season advocacy. o For example, federal election law prohibits giving someone something of value in exchange for voting. o State law will likely regulate how you can interact with voters at polling sites, how and when voters can vote by mail (vs. in-person), and more! Best Practices: · Provide training to staff and volunteers so they know how to effectively engage in GOTV work without running afoul of the Internal Revenue Code, federal election laws, or state law. · Develop and implement an organizational election season policy that is reviewed and signed by all staff, volunteers, and others who could potentially speak on behalf of your organization. Key Takeaways: · GOTV efforts are a powerful way for 501(c)(3) public charities to advance civic participation and strengthen communities. · 501(c)(3) public charities can encourage people to vote while remaining nonpartisan. · Thoughtful planning, training, and compliance practices help (c)(3)s strengthen civic participation in their communities · Effective GOTV efforts can engage communities by leveraging trusted relationships, reducing barriers to participation, and providing clear, nonpartisan voting information. Resources: Want to Conduct or Fund a Voter Registration Drive? The Rules of the Game: A Guide to Election-Related Activities for 501(c)(3) Organizations Voter Registration Rules for Private Foundations Nonprofits, Elections, & the Fine Art of Remaining Nonpartisan Sample 501(c)(3) Organizational Policy for Election Season Vote 411 | — | ||||||
| 8/5/26 | Charitable Solicitation | On today's episode we will cover Charitable Solicitation Registration! If your nonprofit asks people for donations, you probably need to register with state regulators before you make the ask, and the rules are different in every state. We'll break down what charitable solicitation is, how it differs from your IRS tax-exempt status, what the most common misconceptions are, and what organizations should do to stay compliant with these laws. Today we are thrilled to be joined by our BA Summer Legal intern, Lina Zuluaga. On this Episode Brittany Leonard Tim Mooney Lina Zuluaga (Legal Intern) Shownotes: Opening: Intros (, Brittany, ) 1. - Intro about a. Lina's summer internship experience 2. - Starting with the basics: What is charitable solicitation and why does it exist? a. Charitable solicitation registration is a state law consumer protection requirement i. It is not a federal obligation ii. States require organizations that ask the public for charitable donations to register with a state regulator, usually the Attorney General or Secretary of state, before they begin soliciting b. The purpose is fraud prevention and transparency, not taxation. i. States want to know who is asking their residents for money and how those funds are being used. c. Roughly 40 states, plus D.C. have some form of registration requirement. About 10 states have no general charitable solicitation law. T[LZ1] [BL2] hese states don't have a general pre-registration requirement, though some still impose disclosure or other obligations i. States with no registration requirements include Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, Vermont, Utah and Wyoming. ii. States with limited, or conditional registration requirements include Texas and Arizona. Their requirements are triggered by fundraising activities rather than a charitable solicitation act. d. The key definitions to understand: i. Solicitation: a request for a contribution for a charitable purpose, through any medium. 1. Example: sending mail to citizens of a particular state, asking them to donate to your cause! ii. Contribution: a gift of money or property 1. Example: receiving a check in the mail from a new donor you've never contacted! 3. -Three registrations commonly confused: IRS tax exempt status, state business registration, and charitable solicitation registration a. IRS 501(c)(3) determination – refers to federal tax-exempt status. The organization is exempt from federal income tax, and donors can deduct contributions. i. Tax exempt status on its own does not authorize fundraising in every state. b. State business registration – is required when a nonprofit has a presence or does business in another state. It's a corporate filing with the Secretary of State. c. Charitable solicitation registration – separate, additional obligation triggered by asking for donations. Many states require nonprofits to submit their IRS determination letter as part of the state registration, underscoring that federal status is a prerequisite, not a substitute. d. Myth #1 – Tax exempt status gives you nationwide solicitation coverage i. Scenario: A newly formed 501(c)(3) receives its IRS determination letter. The board treasurer says: "Awesome! We're good to fundraise everywhere now!" Is that right? ii. No! That's a common misconception. The IRS determination letter means the federal government recognizes the organization as tax-exempt. It says nothing about whether you can legally ask for donations in California, New York, or any other state. There are separate state-level obligations with their own applications, fees, and renewal deadlines to be aware of. e. An IRS determination letter is not a license to fundraise. Federal tax-exempt status and state solicitation registration are separate legal obligations. 4. - Common misconceptions (FAQs) a. - Do I need to register in every state we receive a donation from? For example, my nonprofit is based in Florida, and I receive a donation from someone in Indiana. i. - No. Receiving a donation is not the same as soliciting one. Registration is triggered by making the ask, not by the receipt. ii. - Also, Indiana is one of the states that doesn't have a charitable solicitation registration requirement. So, in this instance, registration wouldn't be required either way. iii. – But this analysis would be different if the donation came from New York after you specifically solicited New York residents. Sending fundraising emails to residents there triggers New York's registration requirement. b. How about if we have a donate button on our website. Do we need to register in all 50 states? i. - The leading guidance comes from the Charleston Principles, developed in 2001 by the National Association of State Charity Officials, or NASCO. ii. - Under the Charleston Principles, a nonprofit generally needs to register in a state if its website specifically targets residents of that state, or if it receives contributions from that state on a repeated, ongoing, or substantial basis. iii. - A purely passive website with a donate button that isn't targeting any particular state generally wouldn't trigger registration everywhere. iv. – That said, the Charleston Principles are guidance, not law. A small number of states including Colorado, Tennessee, and Mississippi, have enacted administrative regulations that mirror the principles' framework with specific numerical thresholds. In those states, the parallel rules are binding law, but their legal force comes from the state rulemaking process, not from the Principles themselves. v. – the practical takeaway for organizations is that the Charleston Principles are a useful starting point, but they are not a safe harbor. You cannot point to them as an excuse for not abiding by state regulation. If you're doing active online fundraising, email campaigns to donors in other states, or geo-targeted advertisement seeking donations in another state, that's going to look a lot more like solicitation than a passive donate button on a website. c. - Do we still need to register if we're a small organization just working with volunteers? i. - In some states, small organizations may qualify for an exemption based on their revenue. ii. -Two important points to consider: 1) thresholds for exemptions vary by state, and 2) many exemptions must be affirmatively claimed. Your organization may need to file a form to claim the exemption. iii. smaller organizations may also wonder about membership dues and conference fees. 5. Membership Dues and Conference Registration Fees a. – That's right. One question that came up during a technical assistance request this summer was whether collecting membership dues and conference registration fees would trigger a charitable solicitation registration. b. - The short answer is generally no, because most states distinguish between charitable solicitations and earned revenue. c. – The Model Act Concerning the Solicitation of Funds for Charitable Purposes, drafted by the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) and NASCO in 1986 defines "contribution" as grant, promise, or pledge of value in response to a solicitation, but expressly excludes bona fide fees, dues or assessments paid by members, provided that membership is not conferred solely as consideration for making a contribution in response to a solicitation. d. - Conference registration fees are generally treated the same way. When someone pays to attend a conference and receives programming, materials, and meals of roughly equivalent value, that's program service revenue, not a contribution. e. There's also instances to distinguish when membership fees may be considered solicitation i. – One instance to consider is if membership is granted automatically to anyone who donates in response to solicitation. 1. A membership conferred solely as consideration for a gift may be considered a contribution. ii. – Another instance is if you have a "supporter" tier priced well above the value of benefits. The excess can start to look like a contribution. 1. Contributions dressed up as dues risk losing the bona fide dues exclusion. iii. – Also, if you add an option to donate on a conference registration form, or a 'sponsor and attendee' add-on, you've introduced solicitation into the same transaction. 1. The conference fee itself is earned revenue, but the donation ask is you asking someone for a gift. 6. Practical Compliance a. What does registration actually involve? i. – registration itself is typically straightforward. An application normally asks you to submit your formation documents, IRS determination letter, most recent Form 990, a list of officers and directors, description of fundraising activities, and a filing fee. 1. Some states accept the Unified Registration Statement, which is a multi-state form. Colorado, Florida, and Oklahoma do not accept it. Even states that do accept it may require supplemental documents. ii. – Renewal is also an important compliance consideration. Most states require annual renewal, often tied to the organization's fiscal year-end, with a new Form 990 and fee each cycle. Organizations that miss a renewal may receive noncompliance letters from their state agency for failure to renew. b. What happens if we don't register? i. – The consequences are real and can escalate. Regulators can issue cease and desist orders, which means the organization must stop soliciting and take down donate links. In some cases, they may even have to notify donors. Some states issue fines each day until the violation is corrected. ii. – Beyond direct legal consequences, there's also a reputational impact to consider. Violations can become public record. Some grantors and major donors review registration status as part of due diligence before giving to an organization. c. When should organizations get help? i. – it depends, but organizations may consider their size and the number of states they solicit donations in. For example, small, local organizations with smaller footprints in a few states can likely handle their registration and renewals themselves. Organizations that are soliciting in the double-digit states may want to consider outsourcing their compliance. ii. – Organizations may also consider consulting with their legal counsel. It's helpful to talk to your lawyer when the question stops being "which form do I file" and starts being "what does this statute mean?" Interpreting state definition of contributions, responding to a cease-and-desist letter, structuring a professional fundraiser contract, or navigating a multi-entity fundraising arrangement all entail judgment calls that would be best informed by legal expertise. Resources: · https://afj.org/article/does-your-nonprofit-have-a-donation-page-heres-what-you-need-to-know/ · https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/charitable-solicitation-initial-state-registration · 2001 EO CPE Text State Charitable Solicitations Statutes, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici01.pdf · https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/running-nonprofit/fundraising-and-resource-development/charitable-solicitation-registration · https://charitystateregistration.org/ · https://www.nasconet.org/resources/state-government | — | ||||||
| 7/22/26 | Forming a 501(c)(4) | This week we are talking about 501(c)(4)s, or social welfare organizations. What are the advantages to starting one? How are they different than 501(c)(3)s and other types of nonprofits? And what are the important considerations when determining if a 501(c)(4) would be a good vehicle to use to conduct the types of activities you are hoping to engage in to achieve your mission? If you are curious about 501(c)(4)s, what they can do, and how they operate... this podcast episode is for you. Attorneys for this Episode Natalie Ossenfort Susan Finkle Sourlis Quyen Tu Shownotes Scenario: · Existing 501(c)(3) has a mission focused on providing potable water to the residents of a community, who are currently unable to tap into a reliable water supply. · The city, county, and state have failed to step up, so the 501(c)(3)'s staff raise funds for bottled water that they deliver to the community. · What the organization's founders thought would be a temporary fix, has now been operational for several years, and the water situation is not improving. · The 501(c)(3)'s founders want to do more to address the needs of the community, and some are considering starting an affiliated 501(c)(4). General Rules & Characteristics for 501(c)(3)s: · 501(c)(3) organizations have a very favorable tax status. · They are tax-exempt, and their donors can take advantage of a tax deduction for their contributions. · 501(c)(3) public charities are limited in the amount of lobbying (or legislative advocacy) they can engage in, and they are prohibited from engaging in partisan political activity. Advantages of 501(c)(4)s · 501(c)(4)s are social welfare organizations. · They are tax-exempt organizations that operate for the common good and general welfare of the community. · Donations to 501(c)(4)s are not tax-deductible for donors, but... · 501(c)(4)s can conduct an unlimited amount of lobbying (or legislative) activity, and they can do some partisan work to support or oppose candidates for public office, but that type of activity must remain a secondary activity of the organization. Scenario: · If the 501(c)(3) founders wanted to advocate more aggressively for legislative changes that could provide a long-term solution to their community's water access problem, they might consider forming a 501(c)(4). · How much political (or partisan) activity could the organization conduct? If a 501(c)(4) decides to engage in any partisan political activity, that must be a secondary purpose of the organization and not the primary purpose. Primary Purpose Activities · Issue advocacy and lobbying o In our scenario, this could include advocacy in front of the local city council or state legislature for reliable access to water. o It could also include ballot measure advocacy. · Nonpartisan voter outreach to get out the vote and mobilize the community · Conduct research and educate legislators on issues · Engage in litigation to defend the rights of their constituents, and more... Secondary Purpose Activities · Candidate endorsements · Voter outreach activities using partisan targeting · Comparing the organization's stance on issues to where the candidates stand on those issues · Encouraging people to vote for candidates from certain political parties or with certain issue positions, and more... · When engaging in this type of activity, a 501(c)(4) must make sure that any partisan work remains a secondary purpose, and it must be mindful of and comply with campaign finance and election laws at the federal, state, and local levels. Secondary purpose activity... how much is too much? · A 501(c)(4) must maintain a primary purpose that is nonpartisan. · Tax lawyers differ on what they think is the ideal primary / secondary purpose split. · In order to be cautious, a 501(c)(4) could consider keeping its secondary purpose activities to 40% or less. · The IRS has created a safe harbor for organizations applying for 501(c)(4) status: · 60% or more of its total expenditures (including reasonably allocable overhead) and total time (measured by employee and volunteer hours) is devoted to social welfare activity; and · less than 40% of its total expenditures and total time is devoted to political campaign activity. Affiliated Organizations Some things to keep in mind if a 501(c)(3) wants to form an affiliated 501(c)(4): Start-up costs should not come from the (c)(3), but instead should be independently raised for the formation of the (c)(4). Once the 501(c)(4) is formed, it should implement a cost-sharing agreement to ensure that no 501(c)(3) resources are being used to impermissibly subsidize (c)(4) work. It should implement time tracking systems to ensure that staff and volunteers track their 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) work separately. How Would an Existing 501(c)(3) Decide Whether to Form an Affiliated 501(c)(4)? · Examine whether your 501(c)(3) public charity is getting close to its lobbying limits, but still wants to do more legislative advocacy. · Examine whether there is a need for a more political, and policy focused voice to advocate on your issues and support your communities. · Examine whether you want to engage in activities that are prohibited for 501(c)(3)s, but permissible for 501(c)(4)s (support or opposition of candidates) · Examine whether you have sufficient financial resources to cover the start-up costs of a 501(c)(4) from sources other than your 501(c)(3), etc. Resources · The Connection: Guide to Creating and Operating 501(c)(3)s, 501(c)(4)s, and Political Organizations · Comparison of 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) Permissible Activities (Factsheet) · Navigating the Gray: Tips for working in coalition when the law isn't clear (Factsheet) · Coalition Checklist (Guide) | — | ||||||
| 7/8/26 | nonprofit advocacynominations+4 | — | 501(c)(3) public charitiesExecutive Branch+3 | — | nonprofitsnominations+5 | — | 12m 27s | ||
| 6/24/26 | state legislative updatenonprofit advocacy+3 | Maggie Ellinger-LockeSusan Finkle Sourlis+1 | Bolder Advocacy | LouisianaWest Virginia+1 | legislative sessionnonprofit+5 | — | 17m 02s | ||
| 6/10/26 | philanthropyfunding challenges+3 | Matthew L. EvansBrittany Hacker Leonard+1 | United Philanthropy ForumSoutheastern Council on Foundations+1 | — | philanthropyadvocacy+3 | — | 22m 30s | ||
| 5/27/26 | election seasonpolitical activity+3 | Victor RiveraQuyen Tu+1 | 501(c)(3)Bolder Advocacy | — | election501(c)(3)+3 | — | 14m 48s | ||
| 5/13/26 | nonprofit advocacyelectioneering+3 | — | 501(c)(3)IRS | — | nonprofitselection season+5 | — | 17m 49s | ||
| 4/29/26 | candidate appearancesnonpartisan education+3 | Quyen TuVictor Rivera+1 | Bolder Advocacy | — | candidate appearancesc3 organizations+3 | — | 15m 32s | ||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 4/15/26 | ballot measuresdirect democracy+3 | Susan Finkle SourlisTim Mooney+1 | Bolder AdvocacyBallotpedia | — | ballot measuresdirect democracy+3 | — | 21m 58s | ||
| 4/1/26 | nonprofit advocacyvoter registration+3 | Tim MooneyNatalie Roetzel Ossenfort+1 | 501(c)(3)ICE | — | nonprofitadvocacy+3 | — | 22m 21s | ||
| 3/18/26 | legislationnonprofit advocacy+3 | Maggie Ellinger-LockeSusan Finkle Sourlis+1 | Bolder AdvocacyGeorgia's SB 586 | United States | legislationnonprofits+5 | — | 16m 57s | ||
| 3/4/26 | litigationtax-exempt organizations+3 | Emma Olson Sharkey | Elias Law GroupFreedom Path, Inc.+7 | MontanaFlorida | litigation updatetax-exempt organizations+3 | — | 27m 56s | ||
| 2/18/26 | college athleticsnonprofits+5 | Tim MooneyVictor Rivera | NCAAHouse v. NCAA+3 | — | NILnonprofit colleges+5 | — | 17m 28s | ||
| 2/4/26 | voter registrationnonprofit advocacy+3 | — | 501(c)(3) nonprofits | — | voter registrationnonprofit+3 | — | 21m 23s | ||
| 1/21/26 | lobbyingnonprofits+4 | — | Movement Advancement Project | Vermont | lobbyingpublic charities+5 | — | 17m 34s | ||
| 1/7/26 | nonprofit advocacyNew Year's resolutions+3 | — | National Council of Nonprofits | — | nonprofitadvocacy+3 | — | 14m 30s | ||
| 12/24/25 | advocacynonprofits+3 | Maggie Ellinger-LockeSusan Finkle Sourlis+1 | Washington Low Income Housing AllianceThe Women's Foundation of Colorado+1 | WashingtonColorado+1 | advocacy winsnonprofits+3 | — | 15m 06s | ||
| 12/10/25 | Nonprofits Under Siege: Don't Panic, Prepare! | In recent months, the threats facing nonprofit organizations have continued to develop at a furious pace. In the face of challenges like funding reductions and congressional investigations, nonprofits are taking the time to shore up their defenses and prepare for what's to come. On this episode, we'll discuss several recent events that have the sector talking so that your nonprofit can take the steps necessary to ensure your continued ability to boldly advocate on behalf of your communities. Attorneys for this episode · Brittany Hacker Leonard · Tim Mooney · Natalie Ossenfort Shownotes · In recent months: o Federal Executive Orders & Memos: § March 7: EO entitled "Restoring Public Service Loan Forgiveness", which makes employees of organizations with a "substantial illegal purpose" ineligible for public service loan forgiveness benefits. · "Targets orgs supporting terrorism and aiding an dabetting illegal immigration" § August 28: EO entitled "Use of Appropriated Funds for Illegal Lobbying and Partisan Political Activity by Federal Grantees", where the President directs the Attorney General to investigate whether federal grant funds are being used to support lobbying initiatives. § September 25: National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-7)+ Sept 22 EO designating Antifa as domestic terrorist org: designating domestic groups as terrorist orgs. o Congressional Oversight (Letters and Hearings): § October 6: Ways and Means Committee Letter to IRS requesting investigation of specific nonprofits and revocation of their tax-exempt status § October 28: Letter sent to three 501(c)(3) foundations regarding their compliance with nonprofit tax law § November 5: Letter sent to the Environmental Protection Agency regarding its funding of "far-left" organizations via the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund § Check out the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law's congressional investigations tracker for additional examples. o State-Level Actions: § Texas: November 18 Executive Order designating certain organizations "foreign terrorist organizations", barring them from purchasing property in the state. · Stay alert: o Be on the lookout for new state laws related to foreign contributions to ballot measures. At least 19 states have enacted bans on contributions from foreign nationals to ballot question efforts, nine during the 2025 legislative session alone. o Expect a possible uptick in I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) Enforcement. Employers are required to timely and properly complete and retain Form I-9 for each employee they hire. · What you can do: o Don't fall for the sternly worded "Letters to Santa" by Members of Congress. o Conduct a compliance self-assessment with AFJ Bolder Advocacy's "Advocacy Check-Up" tool. o Take advantage of the Nonprofit Legal Defense Network (created in partnership with We The Action). o Brush up on federal and state election season advocacy rules in advance of the 2026 Midterms, and adopt an election season advocacy policy for signature by staff, board members, and volunteers. o Lobby against legislation that would create new barriers to your nonprofit's advocacy. Just remember to stay within your public charity lobbying limits. o Go on the offense. o Reach out to AFJ's Bolder Advocacy team for free technical assistance. Resources · Break in Case of Panic! hub · Preparing for Politically Motivated Attacks on-demand webinar · How Nonprofits Can Fight Back Against Trump's Harmful Executive Orders blog · Advocacy Check-Up: compliance self-assessment tool for 501(c)(3) public charities · Nonprofit Legal Defense Network | — | ||||||
| 11/26/25 | Giving Thanks | On this episode, we gather around the virtual table and share three success stories for nonprofit advocacy that may help to put a smile on your face and give you something positive to reflect on, in a year that could use a lot more of that. Attorneys for this episode · Tim Mooney · Quyen Tu · Sarah Efthymiou Shownotes UNIDOS MN Action and the power of advocacy · Driver's licenses for undocumented people revoked in MN 2003 · The 2022 change in political landscape that set the stage · The work led by UNIODS MN Action to pass HF4 · The outcome - tens of thousands of people can now drive legally—no more choosing between getting to work and risking their family's stability · Emilia González Avalos, one of the key leaders of UNIDOS MN, handed us an officially signed copy of the bill · She said they wanted me to have it because the legal strategy support from Bolder Advocacy on (c)(4)s gave information and confidence for UNIDOS MN Action up and running and that mattered in getting this win Heinz using PRG hub to give out specific project grants Summer of 2023, launched with support from Robert Wood Johnson F Our explainer videos provide a clear and concise overview of how the PGR works and how private foundations (and their grantees) can take advantage of it. Our factsheets provide more in-depth information on the PGR and explain how to use our new PGR budget templates. Our budget templates help foundations and grantees ensure that when a grant applicant submits a project budget, it meets the requirements of the PGR. Earlier in the year, a foundation staff was on a conference panel and blatantly said foundations can't lobby. A similar occurrence happen when our colleague attended Foundations, both private and public, have us train their staff on understanding the rules and addressing their specific concerns Response from Legal Community · NLDN: collaboration between AFJ & We the Action – to empower NPs to withstand challenges, e.g., audits and attacks on TE status; legal clinics · State AGs: joined forces w/NPs (NCNP, etc.) to challenge funding freezes | — | ||||||
| 11/12/25 | Election Season Prep | Whether it be local elections or picking a new president, election season seems to always be lurking around the corner, so on today's episode we're unpacking what it means for 501(c)(3)s to remain nonpartisan and how these nonprofits can safely engage in several different types of advocacy during election season. Attorneys for this episode Monika Graham Melissa Marichal Zayas Sarah Efthymiou Remaining Nonpartisan: The rule is clear: 501(c)(3) organizations cannot engage in any activity or make statements that suggest support or opposition to political parties, candidates, or groups of candidates running for public office, including those not affiliated with a specific political party. However, the definition of what counts as "nonpartisan" remains somewhat unclear. The IRS uses a "facts and circumstances" test to determine whether a charity's communication and/or activity is truly nonpartisan or a disguised attempt to influence an election. The IRS considers whether the communication and/or activity: identifies candidates compares a candidate's position on issues important to the organization with the organization's positions on those same issues expresses approval or disapproval of a candidate's position or actions is delivered close to an election, references voting, focuses on issues that distinguish candidates is part of an ongoing series of communications independent of election timing or coincides with non-electoral events like legislative hearings on pending bills DO: Keep your focus on issues, not elections. Continue mission-related issue advocacy but avoid suggesting how people should vote. Educate voters. Provide nonpartisan facts, resources, and information about voting without mentioning or implying support for candidates or parties Host candidate forums or publish questionnaires: Invite all viable candidates and give each candidate an equal opportunity to participate Ensure questions are neutral, related to your charitable purpose, and cover a broad range of issues Share responses verbatim and without commentary Register voters and encourage turnout (GOTV) in a nonpartisan manner — serve everyone equally, regardless of political affiliation. Remember, there are special rules for private foundations Document everything. Keep records showing how you designed and implemented your activities to avoid partisanship. Develop a track record of similar advocacy in non-election years Train staff and volunteers they understand what's allowed and what's off-limits during election season Separate personal and organizational activities. Staff and board members may support candidates on their own time, but not using organizational resources (e.g., name, email, office space, social media) Engage in ballot measure advocacy but remember to track and report this activity as lobbying if expressing a view on the measure and trying to influence the vote Meet with the candidates, educate them about your organization's work, and try to influence their platforms, while ensuring that you provide the same or equivalent information to every candidate DON'T: Endorse, oppose, or rate candidates — directly or indirectly Use "code words" (e.g., "vote pro-life," "support progressive values," "throw out the incumbents") that imply candidate support or opposition Time issue advocacy communications to coincide with elections if the message could be seen as favoring one candidate's position. Publish or share candidate statements selectively or with commentary that signals approval or disapproval Use organization funds, staff time, or materials for any partisan campaign activity Let candidates use your events, publications, or platforms for campaign purposes. Coordinate messaging with a candidate or you could also trigger campaign contribution restrictions under federal election law Resources: Rules of the Game: A Guide to Election-Related Activities for 501(c)(3) Organizations Seize the Initiative: A Legal Guide on Ballot Measures for Nonprofits and Foundations Being a Player: A Guide to the IRS Regulations for Advocacy Charities Keeping Track: A Guide to Recordkeeping for Advocacy Charities Running the Advocacy Race: Bolder Advocacy's Top Resources for an Impactful 2024 Election Season | — | ||||||
| 10/15/25 | SCOTUS Term Preview and Advocacy for 501(c)(3)s | It's fall, it's October and the US Supreme Court is back in session. On today's episode, we have a special guest from the AFJ Justice team. We are joined by our colleague Jamal Lockings. With Jamall we will cover the big cases to be heard by the court. Then we will talk about how nonprofits can get involved with supreme court advocacy, nominees, and more while staying nonpartisan and being mindful of lobbying limits. Attorneys for this Episode Brittany Hacker Susan Finkle Sourlis Jamaal Lockings Intro to Justice Program Our justice team works on both federal and state judicial appointments and elections and runs numerous invaluable resources including our judicial vacancy tracker and helps keep us and the public informed about nominees. This includes the decisions they make after they've been confirmed, and how cases in federal courts – especially the supreme court – are impacting our civil rights and democracy. Today, we are thrilled to be joined on the pod by our friend and colleague Jamaal Lockings. Jamaal is a fellow attorney who serves as a Dorot Fellow on the Federal Courts team. Today we want to talk about the upcoming cases in this supreme court term, what we should be keeping an eye on, the potential impacts for our c3 partners, and what nonprofits can do during this term and future terms to advocate. Cases to watch out for this term Voting Rights and Money In Politics Louisiana v. Callais Issue: Whether a states efforts to comply with the VRA is, in itself, a form of racial discrimination (1) Rehearing from last term (2) The Court is playing politics (3) the VRA is on the chopping block Consequences: A final blow to the VRA, and increased difficulty for minority voters to participate in free and fair elections National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC Issue: Whether to maintain the federal limits on political party coordination w/ candidates in campaign advertising. (1) Could render campaign contribution limits meaningless, increasing the already outsized influence of money in politics (2) These cases on elections and voting rights can't be observed in a vacuum LGBTQ+ Chiles v. Salazar Issue: Whether Colorado's ban on "conversion therapy" for minors violates First Amendment protections of free speech and religious exercise (1) Religious litigants have been notoriously successful in this court (2) free speech and religious exercise have been used not to ensure equity or equality but to prop up Christian nationalist ideology. West Virginia v. B.P.J. Issue: Title IX and barring Trans athletes (1) This court continues to wade into culture wars (2) It's ruling in Skrmetti and Justice Barrett's assertion that Trans isn't a protected states (3) Embolden lawmakers to continue to write oppressive laws against trans individuals Executive Power & Civil Liberties Trump v. Slaughter Issue: whether statutory removal protections for members of the FTC – and agencies like it – "violate" the separation of powers. (1) The Court's emergency orders this summer (2) growing belief in the unitary executive theory (3) Likely to overrule Humphrey's executor Consequences: Collapse of independent agencies and with it, governing stability. What c3s can do: Supreme court advocacy is nonpartisan—you are free to stand for or against cases before any court or get involved in the cases. Litigation at the supreme court: c3s are often the best voice and represent groups who otherwise would not be heard or could not bring such large scale cases Amicus briefs Educating the public about cases and impacts of opinions As you know c3 public charities may engage in lobbying and there are ways through lobbying that can affect the courts at the federal or maybe the state level Nominee advocacy—Advocate for or against nominees to supreme court (lobbying) Remember the lower district courts and circuit courts as well Remember the lobbying rules if you are a c3: must track and report your lobbying the IRS and stay within your lobbying limits. Great place for c4s to get involved because they can lobbying in an unlimited amount. Ethics advocacy—ask congress for more oversight or ethics rules (Lobbying if it will require a legislative vote). Resources Alliance for Justice, Being a Player Alliance for Justice, Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices Alliance for Justice, Judicial Nominee Tracker Alliance for Justice, Supreme Court Reform | — | ||||||
| 10/1/25 | Back to Basics: Comparing Tax-Exempt Organizations | With school back in session and fall in the air, it's the perfect time to get back to basics on the Rules of the Game podcast. On today's episode, we'll review how the advocacy rules differ across the various types of tax-exempt organizations, including 501(c)(3)s, 501(c)(4)s, and PACs. Whether you're a seasoned advocate or just starting out, understanding these fundamentals is crucial for crafting bold advocacy plans that maximize your capacity and comply with the appropriate rules. Join us for a quick refresher! Attorneys for this Episode Melissa Marichal Zayas Natalie Ossenfort Susan Finkle Sourlis Comparison of tax-exempt organizations There are many different types of tax-exempt organizations – our federal tax code offers 29 different types of tax exemptions to choose from! 501(c)(3)s 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-exempt, and donations to 501(c)(3)s are tax deductible. With this favorable treatment come some restrictions related to lobbying and election season advocacy. · Public Charities (including Community / Public Foundations) o Prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates for public office o Allowed to lobby so long as they stay within certain lobbying limits and use unrestricted dollars to pay for lobbying activities o May also conduct nonpartisan election-related activities including voter outreach, voter education, voter registration, etc. · Private Foundations o Prohibited from supporting or opposing candidates for public office o Effectively barred from lobbying due to a steep excise tax that applies to private foundation lobbying expenditures o Should also be aware of specific rules related to voter registration activities 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, 501(c)(5) unions, and 501(c)(6) trade associations These organizations enjoy tax exempt status, but donations to them are not tax-deductible for the donor. However, they can engage in a wider array of advocacy activities than 501(c)(3)s. · They are allowed to lobby without tax code lobbying limits. · They can engage in some partisan political activity as a secondary purpose (for example, express advocacy). · When engaging in partisan activities, they need to be aware of campaign finance regulations and reporting thresholds. · At the federal level (and in most states), corporations - including tax-exempt organizations - are prohibited from making monetary or in-kind contributions to candidates or political parties. 527 – political organizations 527 political organizations include political parties; campaign committees for candidates running for federal, state, or local office; and federal or state political action committees ("PACs"). · The primary purpose of a 527 must be to engage in activities that influence the selection, nomination, election or appointment of an individual to a public office or an office in a political organization. · They do not generally engage in lobbying. Their lobbying expenditures may be subject to tax if the lobbying does not further political purposes. · There are many types of PACs, including traditional PACs and Super PACs. How can these organizations work together? Despite the different restrictions on lobbying and political activity, there are several ways to safely collaborate with organizations that have a different type of tax exemption. 501(c)(3) private foundations & 501(c)(3) public charities · Private foundations and public charities can engage in joint nonpartisan, non-lobbying activities, like public education campaigns. · Private foundations can also fund public charities, but they must ensure that they don't earmark any funds for lobbying. 501(c)(3) private foundations & 501(c)(4)s/501(c)(5)s/501(c)(6)s · Private foundations can also fund 501(c)(4)s, (c)(5)s, and (c)(6)s, but they must follow what are called the expenditure responsibility rules when granting to any non-(c)(3) organization. 501(c)(3) public charities & 501(c)(4)s/501(c)(5)s/501(c)(6)s · Public charities, including public and community foundations, can also collaborate with and fund (c)(4)s, (c)(5)s, and (c)(6)s. · Remember, your tax-exempt status follows your organization into any coalition work, so (c)(3)s must track any lobbying they engage in on behalf of or in support of the coalition and continue to stay within their lobbying limits. · All joint activities and campaigns must be nonpartisan, and any grants from a c3 to a c4 must prohibit the use of funds for partisan political activity. · The IRS will count the full grant from a c3 public charity to a c4 as a (c)(3) grassroots lobbying expenditure, unless the grant agreement explicitly prohibits the use of funds for lobbying or states what portions may be used for direct and for grassroots lobbying. 501(c)(4)s/501(c)(5)s/501(c)(6)s & 527 political organizations · 501(c)(4)s, and all other corporations, should avoid making monetary or in-kind contributions to a political organization or candidate. These types of contributions are prohibited in federal elections, as well as in most state and local elections. · However, 501(c)(4) corporations may establish a traditional federal PAC via a Separate Segregated Fund. o 501(c)(4) corporations may not contribute to this federal PAC or any other political organization, but they can pay for a connected SSF's administrative costs. o There are other special limitations for this type of PAC, including that it can only raise funds from the connected organization's bona fide members and its executive and administrative personnel and their families. Resources · Alliance for Justice, The Connection: Strategies for Creating and Operating 501(c)(3)s, 501(c)(4)s, and Political Organizations (See p. 11 for chart comparing tax-exempt organizations) · Alliance for Justice, Focus on Foundations · Alliance for Justice, An Introduction to PACs · Alliance for Justice, How to Fund a 501(c)(4) | — | ||||||
Showing 24 of 100
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart history for Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast
Peaked at #49 in New Zealand, currently #49 in New Zealand.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | — | #49 | #49 | — |
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.