Judgment v. Noticing in Psychoanalysis

Judgment v. Noticing in Psychoanalysis

From Speaking Body by Neil Gorman

April 23, 2026 · 13 min · Season 2 · Episode 13

About this episode

Neil Gorman discusses the distinction between judgment and noticing in psychoanalysis, emphasizing the importance of the unknown in generating desire and questions.

Neil Gorman hosts a short solo episode of The Speaking Body Podcast, continuing his argument that psychoanalysis is oriented by not knowing, privileging the unknown because it generates desire and questions, unlike other therapies that rely on the practitioner knowing. He extends this by distinguishing judging from noticing: judging is tied to knowing and aims to assert conclusions or make something happen, which can stop the process, while noticing involves highlighting what stands out without knowing the outcome, proposing observations to see what they provoke. Using clinical examples, such as a patient repeatedly claiming they want to stop procrastinating, he contrasts forcing an insight through judgment with naming patterns or inconsistencies to see what response emerges. He invites feedback via speakingbody.substack.com and mentions ways to support the show. 00:00 Welcome and Setup 00:21 Recap Not Knowing 01:43 Science and Ethnography Link 02:35 Judging Versus Noticing 04:23 Noticing in Practice 07:15 Procrastination Case Study 09:23 Knowing Versus Proposing 11:08 Listener Feedback and Contact 11:34 Core Takeaway Summary 12:16 Thanks and Support the Show

People in this episode

Host: Neil Gorman

Topics covered

  • psychoanalysis
  • judgment
  • noticing
  • desire
  • procrastination

Keywords

  • clinical examples
  • insight
  • patterns
  • feedback

Mentioned in this episode

Books & works: The Speaking Body Podcast

More episodes of Speaking Body

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Speaking Body podcast page.