About this episode

The episode discusses how ethnic conflicts in Southeast Europe stem from historical configurations during the Ottoman period rather than ancient hatreds.

This talk argues that the ethnic conflicts of Southeast Europe are not the result of “ancient hatreds,” but of a specific historical configuration shaped during the Ottoman period. Under Ottoman rule, earlier forms of statehood did not disappear but survived in memory and identity in a kind of “suspended animation,” while at the same time demographic structures were significantly reshaped. Conflict emerged where these two processes intersected. In regions such as Kosovo, Bosnia, Vojvodina, and Transylvania, one group could claim historical precedence based on earlier statehood, while another could claim legitimacy based on later demographic dominance. The Greek–Turkish case shows a similar pattern, where a Byzantine territorial memory and Turkish nationhood collided over territories that became ethnically mixed during the Ottoman rule. The result is a particular type of conflict: not between truth and falsehood, but between competing and internally coherent forms of historical legitimacy — where both sides can plausibly claim that the land is, in different senses, their own. Csaba B. Horváth, PhD earned his PhD in International Relations at Corvinus University of Budapest after…

More episodes of The Institute of World Politics

• Resources, Power, and Nation Building: Critical Minerals and the New Geopolitics of the 21st · June 9, 2026 · 53 min
• Why Poland Is Inconvenient for EU’s Left-Liberal Elites · May 19, 2026 · 27 min
• The Life and Fate of Paweł Z. Woś. Methodology of Research on the Polish War Generation · May 19, 2026 · 26 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Institute of World Politics podcast page.