The Lead Podcast presented by Heart Rhythm Society

Join Digital Education Committee Member and podcast host Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS, along with this week's guest contributors, Gaurav A. Upadhyay, MD, FHRS and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, MD, FHRS for this exciting conversation! This Heart Rhythm Journal article explores the electrophysiologic signatures that occur during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) as lead position changes, with a focus on identifying "uninterrupted transition" patterns in recorded electrograms. The findings help clarify how subtle lead movement within the interventricular septum can alter electrogram morphology and capture behavior, improving clinicians' ability to confirm true conduction system engagement during implantation. Read the article Learning Objectives Describe the electrophysiologic basis of lead position–dependent electrogram changes observed during left bundle branch pacing. Differentiate uninterrupted transition electrogram patterns from other pacing capture transitions (e.g., septal capture vs LBB capture). Apply electrogram transition findings to improve procedural decision-making for confirming optimal lead placement during LBBP implantation. Article AuthorsJiabo Shen, MD, Longfu Jiang, MD, Hao Wu, MD, Lu Zhang, MD, Hengdong Li, MD, Lifang Pan, MD Podcast ContributorsGaurav A. Upadhyay, MD, FHRS Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, MD, FHRS Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): J. Jacobson Honoraria/Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Zoll Medical Corporation, Vektor Medical Inc. Stocks, Privately Held: Atlas 5D Research: CardioFocus, Inc. Membership on Advisory Committees: Abbott Medical, Johnson and Johnson G. Upadhyay Honoraria/Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Biontronik, Zoll Medical Corporation P. Vijayaraman Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Abbott Medical, Abbott Research: Medtronic Fellowship Support: Medtronic Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Join Digital Education Committee Member and podcast host Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD , and his guests Georgios Leventopoulos, MD, and Muthiah Subramanian, MD, CCDS, CEPS-A, for this week's Lead episode. This Heart Rhythm article investigates the Bachmann bundle as a target for pacing by using retrograde electrical mapping and correlating findings with underlying myocardial microstructure. The piece provides detailed insights into how Bachmann bundle activation pathways relate to tissue architecture, with implications for optimizing physiologic pacing strategies. These findings may help refine pacing techniques that aim to better mimic natural conduction and improve clinical responses. Learning Objectives Describe the anatomical and electrophysiologic characteristics of the Bachmann bundle and its role in atrial conduction. Explain how retrograde mapping and microstructural correlation can identify optimal pacing targets within the atrial conduction system. Evaluate the potential clinical implications of Bachmann bundle pacing for achieving more physiologic atrial activation. Article AuthorsDaniel L. Lustgarten, MD, PhD, FHRS, Nicole Habel, MD, PhD, Margaret Infeld, MD, MS, Daniel Correa de Sa, MD, Robert Lobel, MD, Peter Spector, MD, FHRS, Nathaniel Thompson, MD, Joseph Winget, MD, Neal Duong, BME, Bo Ye, MD, PhD, Paul A. Iaizzo, PhD, Markus Meyer, MD, PhD Podcast Contributors Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD Georgios Leventopoulos, MD Muthiah Subramanian, MD, CCDS, CEPS-A Article Being Discussed Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): G. Leventopolous Nothing to disclose. D.C. Raja Nothing to disclose. M. Subramanian •Nothing to disclose.

Join Digital Education Committee Member and podcast host Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, and her guests Helmut Pürerfellner, MD, FHRS, and Jonathan M. Kalman, MBBS, PhD, FHRS for this week's Lead episode. This episode was recorded LIVE at APHRS 2025 in Yokohama, Japan. The OCEAN randomized trial found that in patients who remained free of atrial arrhythmia at least one year after successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, continuing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban did not significantly reduce the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, or covert cerebral infarcts compared with low-dose aspirin, with both groups experiencing very low event rates. Additionally, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, suggesting that long-term anticoagulation may not be necessary for many post-ablation patients with low to moderate stroke risk. Learning Objectives Evaluate the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulation after successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Interpret the clinical implications of low thromboembolic event rates and increased bleeding risk when comparing anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy in post-ablation patients. Apply study findings to clinical decision-making by identifying which patient populations may safely discontinue long-term anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation. Article Authors Atul Verma, M.D., David H. Birnie, M.D., Chenyang Jiang, M.D., Ph.D., Hein Heidbüchel, M.D., Gerhard Hindricks, M.D., Paulus Kirchhof, M.D., D.Sc., Jeff S. Healey, M.D. , Yunhe Wang, M.D., Nikolaos Dagres, M.D., Marc W. Deyell, M.D., Prashanthan Sanders, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Rajeev K. Pathak, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Pieter Koopman, M.D., Dieter Nuyens, M.D., Paul Novak, M.D., Guy Amit, M.D., Charles Dussault, M.D., Bhavanesh Makanjee, M.D., F. Russell Quinn, M.D., Umjeet Jolly, M.D., Leon Iden, M.D., Malte Kuniss, M.D., Mukul Sharma, M.D., Andrew Ha, M.D., Vidal Essebag, M.D., Ph.D., Jean Champagne, M.D., Michael D. Hill, M.D., Eric E. Smith, M.D., M.P.H., and George A. Wells, Ph.D., for the OCEAN Investigators Host and Contributor Disclosure(s):H. Purerfellner •Honoraria/Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Biosense Webster, Inc., Abbott, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Boston Scientific J.M. Kalman •Research: Zoll Medical Corporation, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific •Fellowship Support: Biosense Webster, Inc., Medtronic M. Middeldorp •Nothing to disclose. Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Join Digital Education Committee Member and podcast host Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, and her guests Eue-Keun Choi, MD, PhD, and Sandeep Prabhu, MBBS, PhD for this week's Lead episode. This episode was recorded LIVE at APHRS 2025 in Yokohama, Japan. The DECAF trial investigated whether continuing regular caffeinated coffee consumption versus complete abstinence affected the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter in patients after successful cardioversion. Over six months in this randomized study of 200 adults, those who drank at least one cup of caffeinated coffee daily had a significantly lower rate of AF or flutter recurrence compared to those who abstained (47% vs. 64%), suggesting moderate coffee intake may be safe and potentially beneficial for rhythm stability in this setting. Learning Objectives Evaluate the impact of caffeinated coffee consumption versus abstinence on atrial fibrillation recurrence following cardioversion. Interpret the design and key outcomes of the DECAF randomized clinical trial and their relevance to clinical practice. Apply the trial findings to patient counseling regarding caffeine intake and atrial fibrillation management. Article Authors Christopher X. Wong, MBBS, MPH, PhD; Christopher C. Cheung, MD, MPH; Gabrielle Montenegro, BA, Hannah H. Oo, BS; Isabella J. Peña, BA; Janet J. Tang, MPH, PhD; Samuel J. Tu, MBBS; Grace Wall, BA1; Thomas A. Dewland, MD; Joshua D. Moss, MD; Edward P. Gerstenfeld, MD; Zian H. Tseng, MD, MAS; Henry H. Hsia, MD; Randall J. Lee, MD, PhD; Jeffrey E. Olgin, MD; Vasanth Vedantham, MD; Melvin M. Scheinman, MD; Catherine Lee, PhD; Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD; Gregory M. Marcus, MD, MAS Podcast Contributors Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD Eue-Keun Choi, MD, PhD Sandeep Prabhu, MBBS, PhD Link to article Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): E.K. Choi •Honoraria/Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Daiichi •Stock Options, Privately Held: DeepQure •Research: Biosense Webster, Inc., Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp., Jeil Pharmaceutical Co, Medtronic, Inc., Samjinpharm, Seers Technology, Skylabs, Genome Opinion Inc S. Prabhu •Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: Biosense Webster •Research: National Health and Medical Research •Fellowship Support: St. Jude Medical Center, Boston Scientific M. Middeldorp •Nothing to disclose. Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Join Digital Education Committee Member and podcast host Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD (Kauvery Hospital), and his guests Nitish Badhwar, MBBS, FHRS (Stanford University), and Yash Lokhandwala, MD, DM, FACC (Holy Family Hospital) for this week's Lead episode. This state-of-the-art review synthesizes current knowledge on multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions (MEPPC) syndrome, highlighting its genetic underpinnings, distinctive electrophysiologic features, and clinical presentation across age groups. The authors emphasize advances in diagnosis and management, including the role of targeted pharmacologic therapy and catheter ablation, while identifying ongoing gaps in evidence and priorities for future research in this rare but increasingly recognized arrhythmia syndrome. Learning Objectives Describe the genetic, clinical, and electrophysiologic characteristics of MEPPC syndrome and how they distinguish it from other causes of frequent ventricular ectopy. Discuss current diagnostic and management strategies for MEPPC syndrome, including the roles of pharmacologic therapy and catheter ablation. Identify key knowledge gaps and future research directions highlighted in the review and their implications for clinical practice. Article AuthorsPaolo Basile, MD, Maria Cristina Carella, MD, Stefania Zaccaro, MD, Marco Maria Dicorato, MD, Luca Sgarra, MD, Yamna Khan, MD, Gianluca Pontone, MD, PhD, Giovanni Luzzi, MD, PhD, Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono, MD, PhD, Cinzia Forleo, MD, PhD, Marco Matteo Ciccone, MD, PhD, and Andrea Igoren Guaricci, MD, PhD Podcast Contributors Nitish Badhwar, MBBS, FHRS Yash Lokhandwala, MD, DM, FACC Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): N. Badhward•Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Abbott, Zoll Medical Corporation Y. Lokhandwala•Speaking/Teaching/Consulting/Authoring: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal D.C. Raja •Nothing to disclose. Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Join Phillip Cuculich, MD and his guests Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH and Atul Verma, MD, FHRS for this lively discussion of a cutting edge topic. The ALONE-AF trial evaluated whether patients who remained free of atrial fibrillation for at least one year after catheter ablation could safely discontinue long-term oral anticoagulation. In this randomized study of more than 800 patients, stopping anticoagulation resulted in similarly low rates of stroke or systemic embolism and significantly fewer major bleeding events compared with continuing therapy. The findings suggest that, in carefully selected post-ablation patients, long-term anticoagulation discontinuation may be a safe and beneficial strategy. Learning Objectives Evaluate the methodology and patient selection criteria of the ALONE-AF randomized trial to understand which post-ablation patients may be appropriate candidates for long-term anticoagulation discontinuation. Interpret the trial's primary and secondary outcomes to assess the comparative risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients who discontinue versus continue oral anticoagulation after successful AF ablation. Discuss the clinical implications of ALONE-AF for shared decision-making, guideline considerations, and the development of individualized anticoagulation strategies following catheter ablation. Article Authors Daehoon Kim, MD; Jaemin Shim, MD; Eue-Keun Choi, MD, Il-Young Oh, MD; Jun Kim, MD; Young Soo Lee, MD; Junbeom Park, MD; Jum-Suk Ko, MD; Kyoung-Min Park, MD; Jung-Hoon Sung, MD; Hyung Wook Park, MD; Hyung-Seob Park, MD; Jong-Youn Kim, MD, Ki-Woon Kang, MD; Dongmin Kim, MD; Jin-Kyu Park, MD; Dae-Hyeok Kim, MD; Jin-Bae Kim, MD; Hee Tae Yu, MD; Tae-Hoon Kim, MD; Jae-Sun Uhm, MD; Hui-Nam Pak, MD1; Boyoung Joung, MD; for the ALONE-AF Investigators Podcast Contributors Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH Phillip Cuculich, MD Atul Verma, MD, FHRS Article for Discussion

Join host and Digital Education Committee Member Sandeep A Saha, MD, MS, FHRS for this lively discussion with his colleagues Charles A. Henrikson, MD, MPH, FHRS and Arun R. Mahankali Sridhar, MBBS, MPH, FACC. About this Article: In patients with symptomatic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) refractory to medical therapy, non-invasive low-level tragus stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve significantly reduced median PVC burden compared to sham stimulation (median reduction ~13.4% vs ~8.6%; P = 0.021). The findings suggest that autonomic neuromodulation via transcutaneous vagal stimulation may offer a novel adjunctive therapy for frequent PVCs, although further larger trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. Learning Objectives Describe the rationale and mechanism by which transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) may modulate autonomic tone and reduce premature ventricular contractions. Summarize the design, methods, and key outcomes of the NoVa-PVC randomized crossover trial evaluating tVNS for symptomatic PVC reduction. Evaluate the clinical implications, limitations, and potential future applications of noninvasive neuromodulation as a therapeutic approach for ventricular arrhythmias. Article Authors Stefanos Zafeiropoulos MD, MBA, Kristie Coleman MPH, RN, Jonathan Kogan,Dimitrios Varrias MD, Jonas Leavitt BS, Alexandra Bekiaridou MD, Theodoros Zanos PhD, Stavros Zanos PhD, MD, Stavros Stavrakis PhD, MD, Stavros Mountantonakis MD, MBA Podcast Contributors Sandeep A Saha, MD, MS, FHRS Charles A. Henrikson, MD, MPH, FHRS Arun R. Mahankali Sridhar, MBBS, MPH, FACC All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Host Disclosure(s): S. Saha •Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Medtronic ​Contributor Disclosure(s): C. Henrikson •Honoraria/Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: American College of Cardiology A. Sridhar •Nothing to disclose. Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Description Join host and Digital Education Committee Member, Danesh Kella, MBBS, FHRS and his guests Ratika Parkash, MD, MS, FHRS and Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD, FHRS at HRX Live 2025 in Atlanta, for this exciting discussion. The PRAGUE-25 trial, published in JACC in 2025, compared catheter ablation with a program of lifestyle modification plus antiarrhythmic drugs in obese patients (BMI 30–40 kg/m2) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. At 12 months, freedom from atrial fibrillation was significantly higher with ablation (73%) than with lifestyle modification + AADs (35%), despite the latter group achieving greater weight loss and metabolic improvement. The findings suggest that while aggressive risk-factor control improves overall health, catheter ablation remains more effective for rhythm control in this population. Learning Objectives Describe the comparative effectiveness of catheter ablation versus lifestyle modification with antiarrhythmic drug therapy in obese patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Discuss how weight reduction and risk-factor modification influence atrial fibrillation outcomes, while recognizing that catheter ablation provides superior rhythm control despite metabolic improvements achieved through lifestyle intervention. Article Authors Pavel Osmancik, Tomas Roubicek, Stepan Havranek, Jan Chovancik, Veronika Bulkova, Dalibor Herman, Martin Matoulek, Vladimir Tuka, Ivan Ranic, Jana Hozmanova, Marek Hozman, Lucie Znojilova, Adam Latinak, Jan Pidhorodecky, Milan Dusik, Jan Simek, Otakar Jiravsky, Bogna Jiravska-Godula, Frantisek Lehar, Michal Cernosek, Zuzana Hejdukova, Hana Zelinkova, Jiri Jarkovsky, and Klara Benesova Podcast Contributors Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD, FHRS Danesh Kella, MBBS, FHRS Ratika Parkash, MD, MS, FHRS All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Host Disclosure(s): D. Kella •Speaking/Teaching/Consulting: Zoll Medical Corporation, MBW Spectrum ​Contributor Disclosure(s): R. Parkash •Research: Abbott, Medtronic, Novartis • Membership on Advisory Committees: Medtronic P. Sanders •Membership on Advisory Committees: Medtronic PLC, Pacemate, CathRx, Boston Scientific, Abbott Medical • Research: Abbott, Becton Dickinson, Calyan Technologies, Ceryx Medical, Biosense Webster, CathRx, HelloAlfred, Medtronic, Inc., Abbott Medical Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner): S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.