About this episode

Richard Epstein discusses the U.S. strike on Iran and the implications of the War Powers Act.

Richard Epstein defends the U.S. strike on Iran as a necessary act of preemptive self-defense, arguing that waiting for an “imminent” attack would have been reckless in the face of a hostile regime pursuing nuclear capability. He also dives into the War Powers Act, executive authority, regime change, and what “victory” would actually mean—while weighing the risks of escalation against the dangers of hesitation. Is this decisive statecraft or constitutional overreach? Epstein makes the Libertarian hawk case.

People in this episode

Host: The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Guest: Richard Epstein

Topics covered

• U.S. foreign policy
• Iran
• War Powers Act
• regime change
• self-defense
• executive authority
• escalation risks

Keywords

• Iran
• War Powers Act
• self-defense
• regime change
• executive authority
• escalation
• Libertarian hawk

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Books & works: War Powers Act

Places: Iran

More episodes of The Libertarian

• A Turning Point For Section 2: SCOTUS Reins in the Voting Rights Act · April 29, 2026 · 22 min
• The Half-War · April 11, 2026 · 21 min
• The Slippery Slope of Social Media Liability · March 27, 2026 · 23 min
• Tax the Rich . . . Until They Leave: Mamdani and Rent Control · March 21, 2026 · 27 min
• Equal Time in an Unequal Media Environment · February 19, 2026 · 25 min
• Can Social Media Platforms Be Held Liable for User Speech? · January 31, 2026 · 25 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Libertarian podcast page.